125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37892160)
1. Comparison of the Accuracy of Epistasis and Haplotype Models for Genomic Prediction of Seven Human Phenotypes.
Liang Z; Prakapenka D; Da Y
Biomolecules; 2023 Oct; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 37892160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Haplotype Analysis of Genomic Prediction Using Structural and Functional Genomic Information for Seven Human Phenotypes.
Liang Z; Tan C; Prakapenka D; Ma L; Da Y
Front Genet; 2020; 11():588907. PubMed ID: 33324447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Haplotype genomic prediction of phenotypic values based on chromosome distance and gene boundaries using low-coverage sequencing in Duroc pigs.
Bian C; Prakapenka D; Tan C; Yang R; Zhu D; Guo X; Liu D; Cai G; Li Y; Liang Z; Wu Z; Da Y; Hu X
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Oct; 53(1):78. PubMed ID: 34620094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multifactorial methods integrating haplotype and epistasis effects for genomic estimation and prediction of quantitative traits.
Da Y; Liang Z; Prakapenka D
Front Genet; 2022; 13():922369. PubMed ID: 36313431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Haplotype analysis of genomic prediction by incorporating genomic pathway information based on high-density SNP marker in Chinese yellow-feathered chicken.
Ye H; Xu Z; Bello SF; Zhu Q; Kong S; Zheng M; Fang X; Jia X; Xu H; Zhang X; Nie Q
Poult Sci; 2023 May; 102(5):102549. PubMed ID: 36907129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic prediction using information across years with epistatic models and dimension reduction via haplotype blocks.
Vojgani E; Hölker AC; Mayer M; Schön CC; Simianer H; Pook T
PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282288. PubMed ID: 37000811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genome-wide association analysis of total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels using the Framingham heart study data.
Ma L; Yang J; Runesha HB; Tanaka T; Ferrucci L; Bandinelli S; Da Y
BMC Med Genet; 2010 Apr; 11():55. PubMed ID: 20370913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Haplotype-Based Genome-Wide Prediction Models Exploit Local Epistatic Interactions Among Markers.
Jiang Y; Schmidt RH; Reif JC
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 May; 8(5):1687-1699. PubMed ID: 29549092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying gene-gene interactions that are highly associated with four quantitative lipid traits across multiple cohorts.
De R; Verma SS; Holzinger E; Hall M; Burt A; Carrell DS; Crosslin DR; Jarvik GP; Kuivaniemi H; Kullo IJ; Lange LA; Lanktree MB; Larson EB; North KE; Reiner AP; Tragante V; Tromp G; Wilson JG; Asselbergs FW; Drenos F; Moore JH; Ritchie MD; Keating B; Gilbert-Diamond D
Hum Genet; 2017 Feb; 136(2):165-178. PubMed ID: 27848076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extension of a haplotype-based genomic prediction model to manage multi-environment wheat data using environmental covariates.
He S; Thistlethwaite R; Forrest K; Shi F; Hayden MJ; Trethowan R; Daetwyler HD
Theor Appl Genet; 2019 Nov; 132(11):3143-3154. PubMed ID: 31435703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Haplotype-tagged SNPs improve genomic prediction accuracy for Fusarium head blight resistance and yield-related traits in wheat.
Alemu A; Batista L; Singh PK; Ceplitis A; Chawade A
Theor Appl Genet; 2023 Apr; 136(4):92. PubMed ID: 37009920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Expanding the application of haplotype-based genomic predictions to the wild: A case of antibody response against Teladorsagia circumcincta in Soay sheep.
Vahedi SM; Salek Ardetani S; Brito LF; Karimi K; Pahlavan Afshari K; Banabazi MH
BMC Genomics; 2023 Jun; 24(1):335. PubMed ID: 37330501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SNP- and haplotype-based single-step genomic predictions for body weight, wool, and reproductive traits in North American Rambouillet sheep.
Araujo AC; Carneiro PLS; Oliveira HR; Lewis RM; Brito LF
J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Mar; 140(2):216-234. PubMed ID: 36408677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selecting Closely-Linked SNPs Based on Local Epistatic Effects for Haplotype Construction Improves Power of Association Mapping.
Liu F; Schmidt RH; Reif JC; Jiang Y
G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Dec; 9(12):4115-4126. PubMed ID: 31604824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of epistasis effects on the accuracy of predicting phenotypic values of residual feed intake in U. S Holstein cows.
Liang Z; Prakapenka D; Parker Gaddis KL; VandeHaar MJ; Weigel KA; Tempelman RJ; Koltes JE; Santos JEP; White HM; Peñagaricano F; Baldwin Vi RL; Da Y
Front Genet; 2022; 13():1017490. PubMed ID: 36386803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic Prediction Accuracy Using Haplotypes Defined by Size and Hierarchical Clustering Based on Linkage Disequilibrium.
Won S; Park JE; Son JH; Lee SH; Park BH; Park M; Park WC; Chai HH; Kim H; Lee J; Lim D
Front Genet; 2020; 11():134. PubMed ID: 32211021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-additive genetic variation in growth, carcass and fertility traits of beef cattle.
Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Zhang Y; Reverter A; Barendse W; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):26. PubMed ID: 25880217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
