89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3789474)
1. [Identification and rapid determination of the antibiotic resistance of enterobacteria with the automated ABAC identibiogram].
Auge B; Travert MF; Avril JL
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1986; 44(3):239-41. PubMed ID: 3789474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ABAC identibiogramme: prototype of an automated system for identification of enterobacteria.
Durosoir JL
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Feb; 2(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 6341047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of a new system for simultaneous identification and antibiograms of enterobacteria from urine].
Nicolosi VM; Morgantetti F; Desiderio C; Geraci C; Lamicela L; Gazzo G
G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1980; 73(7-12):281-93. PubMed ID: 7308618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of 2 rapid systems for evaluating the sensitivity to antibiotics of 170 strains of Enterobacteriaceae: the Rapid ATB and the Autobac].
Enoch F; Freney J; Combe P; Nervi C; Fleurette J
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1986; 44(5):501-4. PubMed ID: 3813135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of a new rapid antibiogram method, the Rapid-ATB system. Comparison with the agar dilution reference method and the standard antibiogram].
Le Noc P; Gayral JP; Robert J
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 Nov; 33(9):906-10. PubMed ID: 3936008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Validity of the ABAC II system: applicability in the hospital laboratory and verification of breakpoint concentrations in the determination of antibiotic sensitivity].
Sala A; Castagna N; Salicetti M; Cappello P; Gandini G
Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1985 Mar; 21(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 4059508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Rapid ATB. A new system of antibiotic testing in 4 hours. Description and parameters of variation].
Gayral JP; Carret G; Flandrois JP; Le Noc P; Robert J; Albertini MT; Gallice E
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 May; 33(5):350-3. PubMed ID: 3897964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the BD Phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae.
Carroll KC; Glanz BD; Borek AP; Burger C; Bhally HS; Henciak S; Flayhart D
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):3506-9. PubMed ID: 17021074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Determination of sensitivity of rapid growing bacteria by the MS-2-system. A comparison with conventional methods (author's transl)].
Wiebe C; Linzenmeier G
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1981 Dec; 251(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 7200305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of workflow and accuracy of identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterococci by Vitek 2 and routine methods.
Rantakokko-Jalava K; Elo-Lehtonen E; Meurman O
APMIS; 2006 Jan; 114(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16499660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Identification of Gram negative rods and evaluation of their antibiotic sensitivity: comparison of the BIOTEST MHK/ID-system with the API 20E-system and the agar diffusion test].
Stanek G; Hirschl A; Rotter M
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Oct; 253(1):61-75. PubMed ID: 6817546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of disk diffusion, VITEK 2, and broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility test results for unusual species of Enterobacteriaceae.
Stone ND; O'Hara CM; Williams PP; McGowan JE; Tenover FC
J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 45(2):340-6. PubMed ID: 17135429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Choice of criteria in the revision of the ABAC system for the determination of sensitivity to antibiotics].
Nicolosi VM; Morgantetti F; Desiderio C; Geraci C; Lamicela L
Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1981 Dec; 17(4):567-72. PubMed ID: 7347834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Reliability of the bacterial identification tests and of antibiotic sensitivity tests made with automatic methods].
Goffi M; Somenzi P; Magliani W; Menozzi MG
Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1981 Mar; 17(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 7313071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of the results of antibiotic sensitivity tests made with the ABAC method and the agar diffusion method].
Orsi A; Simonetti T; Morgantetti F
Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1981 Mar; 17(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 7313068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli.
O'Hara CM
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Determination of antibiotype by a computer program. Epidemiological significance and antibiogram-identification correlates].
Fosse T; Macone F; Laffont C
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1988 Jun; 36(5 Pt 2):603-7. PubMed ID: 3054733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Sensitivity profiles of enterobacteria isolated at th Fann University Hospital Center, Dakar].
Sow AI; Faye-Niang MA; Mboup EM; Boye CS; Cisse MF; Ndour CT; Soumare M; Seydi M; Gaye M
Dakar Med; 1997; 42(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 9827134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of a new system for the simultaneous identification and antibiotic sensitivity testing of gram-negative bacilli by automation].
Nicolosi VM; Desiderio C; Geraci C; Giusino G; Morgantetti F; Sutera C
Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1983 Mar; 19(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 6675045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
