BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37895333)

  • 1. Laparoscopic Pectopexy versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Apical Prolapse.
    Brasoveanu S; Ilina R; Balulescu L; Pirtea M; Secosan C; Grigoraș D; Chiriac D; Bardan R; Margan MM; Alexandru A; Pirtea L
    Life (Basel); 2023 Sep; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 37895333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perioperative and Long-Term Anatomical and Subjective Outcomes of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension for POP-Q Stages II-IV Apical Prolapse.
    Szymczak P; Grzybowska ME; Sawicki S; Futyma K; Wydra DG
    J Clin Med; 2022 Apr; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 35456313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of the anterior approach versus posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Bastani P; Tayebi S; Ghabousian A; Salehi-Pourmehr H; Hajebrahimi S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1857-1862. PubMed ID: 35347369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic Pectopexy with Burch Colposuspension for Pelvic Prolapse Associated with Stress Urinary Incontinence.
    Pirtea L; Balint O; Secoșan C; Grigoraș D; Ilina R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(5):1023-1024. PubMed ID: 31683027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series.
    Liu Y; Wang C; Wang X; Yan R; Chu L; Chen X
    Front Surg; 2023; 10():1066622. PubMed ID: 37065998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-port laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament suspension
    Lyu Y; Ding H; Ding J; Luo Y; Guan X; Ni G
    Front Surg; 2022; 9():911553. PubMed ID: 35923438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Vaginal Apical Prolapse; the First Randomized Clinical Trial: A pilot study.
    Daneshpajooh A; Pakmanesh H; Sohbati S; Mirzaei M; Zemanati E; Dehesh T
    Urol J; 2022 Jan; 19(2):131-137. PubMed ID: 35094377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Function, quality-of-life and complications after sacrospinous ligament fixation using an antegrade reusable suturing device (ARSD-Ney) at 6 and 12 months: a retrospective cohort study.
    Wang P; Li M; Sun H; Ni L; Cai H; Fan W; Zhou J; Wang J; Ding H; Chen Y; Shen F
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 May; 10(10):582. PubMed ID: 35722418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intermediate-term outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fi xation: a comparative study.
    Astepe BS; Karsli A; Köleli I; Aksakal OS; Terzi H; Kale A
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(5):999-1007. PubMed ID: 31408288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Permanent or absorbable suture material for sacrospinous ligament fixation: Does it matter?
    Padoa A; Ziv Y; Tsviban A; Tomashev R; Smorgick N; Fligelman T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Apr; 283():112-117. PubMed ID: 36827752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical repair of vaginal vault prolapse; a comparison between ipsilateral uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation-a nationwide cohort study.
    Husby KR; Larsen MD; Lose G; Klarskov N
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 32897459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Serious Complications and Recurrence following Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Correction of Apical Prolapse.
    De Gracia S; Fatton B; Cosson M; Campagne-Loiseau S; Ferry P; Lucot JP; Debodinance P; Panel L; Deffieux X; Garbin O; Lamblin G; Carlier-Guérin C; Ramanah R; Fauconnier A; Serrand C; Fritel X; de Tayrac R
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 36675397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fast track sacrospinous ligament fixation: subjective and objective outcomes at 6 months.
    Greisen S; Axelsen SM; Bek KM; Guldberg R; Glavind-Kristensen M
    BMC Womens Health; 2021 Apr; 21(1):154. PubMed ID: 33863314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Prospective cohort study on the outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation using conventional instruments in treating stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
    Ren C; Song XC; Zhu L; Ai FF; Shi HH; Sun ZJ; Chen J; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):369-373. PubMed ID: 28647958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of modified sacrospinous ligament fixation
    Lyu Y; Ding H; Zhang Y; Shi S; Ding J; Zhu C; Guan X; Ni G; Luo Y
    Front Surg; 2022; 9():1010027. PubMed ID: 36406350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus conventional vaginal surgery for sacrospinous ligament fixation of apical compartment prolapse: a retrospective analysis.
    Huang L; Yu J; Li Y; Gong ZL; Feng D; He L; Lin YH
    BMC Surg; 2023 Jan; 23(1):24. PubMed ID: 36707831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation, laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy and abdominal hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy in terms of postoperative quality of life and sexual function.
    Okcu NT; Gürbüz T; Uysal G
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 50(4):101977. PubMed ID: 33166707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
    JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of transvaginal modified sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-before and after studies.
    Zhu Q; Shu H; Du G; Dai Z
    Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():40-43. PubMed ID: 29455045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single incision anterior apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic prolapse surgery at 36 months follow-up.
    Lo TS; Al-Kharabsheh AM; Tan YL; Pue LB; Hsieh WC; Uy-Patrimonio MC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 29241922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.