BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37897090)

  • 1. Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast density.
    Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Su YR; Sprague BL; Stout NK; Onega T; O'Meara ES; Henderson LM; Tosteson ANA; Wernli K; Miglioretti DL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2024 Feb; 116(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 37897090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Risk of Interval Invasive and Advanced Breast Cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Su YR; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Buist DSM; Onega T; Henderson LM; Alsheik N; Bissell MCS; O'Meara ES; Lee CI; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA; 2022 Jun; 327(22):2220-2230. PubMed ID: 35699706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Harada-Shoji N; Suzuki A; Ishida T; Zheng YF; Narikawa-Shiono Y; Sato-Tadano A; Ohta R; Ohuchi N
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121505. PubMed ID: 34406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
    Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.
    Lowry KP; Coley RY; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Herschorn S; Tosteson ANA; Rauscher G; Lee CI
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e2011792. PubMed ID: 32721031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Results After 10 Years of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography.
    Ho TH; Bissell MCS; Kerlikowske K; Hubbard RA; Sprague BL; Lee CI; Tice JA; Tosteson ANA; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar; 5(3):e222440. PubMed ID: 35333365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening Outcomes of Supplemental Automated Breast US in Asian Women with Dense and Nondense Breasts.
    Kwon MR; Choi JS; Lee MY; Kim S; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
    Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222435. PubMed ID: 37097135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.
    Bakker MF; de Lange SV; Pijnappel RM; Mann RM; Peeters PHM; Monninkhof EM; Emaus MJ; Loo CE; Bisschops RHC; Lobbes MBI; de Jong MDF; Duvivier KM; Veltman J; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van Diest PJ; Mali WPTM; van den Bosch MAAJ; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH;
    N Engl J Med; 2019 Nov; 381(22):2091-2102. PubMed ID: 31774954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts.
    Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Lee CI; Akslen LA; Tsuruda KM; Elmore JG; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 29944088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.
    Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA
    J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.
    Glechner A; Wagner G; Mitus JW; Teufer B; Klerings I; Böck N; Grillich L; Berzaczy D; Helbich TH; Gartlehner G
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 3(3):CD009632. PubMed ID: 36999589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study.
    Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Tosteson AN; Sprague BL; Tice JA; Lehman CD; Miglioretti DL;
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 May; 162(10):673-81. PubMed ID: 25984843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Hussein H; Abbas E; Keshavarzi S; Fazelzad R; Bukhanov K; Kulkarni S; Au F; Ghai S; Alabousi A; Freitas V
    Radiology; 2023 Mar; 306(3):e221785. PubMed ID: 36719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast density implications and supplemental screening.
    Vourtsis A; Berg WA
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1762-1777. PubMed ID: 30255244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening for Women With Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.
    Geuzinge HA; Bakker MF; Heijnsdijk EAM; van Ravesteyn NT; Veldhuis WB; Pijnappel RM; de Lange SV; Emaus MJ; Mann RM; Monninkhof EM; de Koekkoek-Doll PK; van Gils CH; de Koning HJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Nov; 113(11):1476-1483. PubMed ID: 34585249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
    Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining quantitative and qualitative breast density measures to assess breast cancer risk.
    Kerlikowske K; Ma L; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Sprague BL; Henderson LM; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM; Shepherd JA
    Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Aug; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 28830497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer risk characteristics of women undergoing whole-breast ultrasound screening versus mammography alone.
    Sprague BL; Ichikawa L; Eavey J; Lowry KP; Rauscher G; O'Meara ES; Miglioretti DL; Chen S; Lee JM; Stout NK; Mandelblatt JS; Alsheik N; Herschorn SD; Perry H; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K
    Cancer; 2023 Aug; 129(16):2456-2468. PubMed ID: 37303202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.