176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37898708)
1. Comparison of efficacy between laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension in the treatment of apical prolapse-short term results.
Peng J; Li S; Wang L; Yang L; Nai M; Xu Q; Jin Y; Liu P; Li L
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18519. PubMed ID: 37898708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uterine preserving technique in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: Laparoscopic pectopexy.
Salman S; Kumbasar S; Yeniocak AS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Mar; 48(3):850-856. PubMed ID: 35001452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension combined with cervical amputation in treatment of women severe uterine prolapsed at child-bearing period].
Sun Z; Zhu L; Hu H; Lang J; Shi H; Gong X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 49(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 24820298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension with uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective cohort study.
Li C; Shu H; Dai Z
Int J Surg; 2018 Jun; 54(Pt A):28-34. PubMed ID: 29673691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic Pectopexy with Burch Colposuspension for Pelvic Prolapse Associated with Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Pirtea L; Balint O; Secoșan C; Grigoraș D; Ilina R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(5):1023-1024. PubMed ID: 31683027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified laparoscopic pectopexy: short-term follow-up and its effects on sexual function and quality of life.
Tahaoglu AE; Bakir MS; Peker N; Bagli İ; Tayyar AT
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1155-1160. PubMed ID: 29500516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Randomised Trial on the Effects of the Addition of Uterosacral Ligament Plication to Pectopexy Operation on Anatomical Restoration and Female Sexual Functions.
Kumtepe Y; Senocak GNC; Sivaslioglu AA; Yapar A; Yilmaz EPT; Kasali K
Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38683391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament colpopexy for apical support in addition to hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Nishimura K; Yoshimura K; Hoshino K; Myoga M; Kubo T; Hachisuga T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1522-1529. PubMed ID: 31172660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair.
Barba M; Cola A; Melocchi T; De Vicari D; Costa C; Volontè S; Sandullo L; Frigerio M
Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Feb; 60(2):. PubMed ID: 38399607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The effectiveness of two different laparoscopic surgeries for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse.
Li S; Ji M; Zhao Z
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():74-8. PubMed ID: 25801721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic pectopexy: initial experience of single center with a new technique for apical prolapse surgery.
Kale A; Biler A; Terzi H; Usta T; Kale E
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(5):903-909. PubMed ID: 28727377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical efficacy of modified sacral fixation under Leonardo da Vinci robot laparoscopy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Wei W; Fang ZY; Chen YL; Ma YQ; Wei X; Yang HY; Zhang CL; Zhai YZ; Cai Q; Lu YX
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Jul; 27(13):6215-6222. PubMed ID: 37458627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Compared with Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.
Yang Y; Li Z; Si K; Dai Q; Qiao Y; Li D; Zhang L; Wu F; He J; Wu G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 30(10):833-840.e2. PubMed ID: 37369345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
Izett-Kay ML; Rahmanou P; Cartwright RJ; Price N; Jackson SR
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1957-1965. PubMed ID: 34424347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction After Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy for Anterior and Apical Prolapse.
Haj Yahya R; Chill HH; Herzberg S; Asfour A; Lesser S; Shveiky D
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(5):352-355. PubMed ID: 28658003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of laparoscopic techniques for apical organ prolapse repair - a systematic review of the literature.
Szymczak P; Grzybowska ME; Wydra DG
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Nov; 38(8):2031-2050. PubMed ID: 31452267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of uterine preservation on outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension.
Bedford ND; Seman EI; O'Shea RT; Keirse MJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 23321154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Quality of Life and Female Sexual Function Following Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy in Apical Prolapse Patients.
Obut M; Oğlak SC; Akgöl S
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2021; 10(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 34040968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
