These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37900713)

  • 21. Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part II - conventional impressions versus digital scans: A clinical controlled crossover study.
    Chebib N; Imamura Y; El Osta N; Srinivasan M; Müller F; Maniewicz S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):618-625. PubMed ID: 36055812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microstomia: entry made easy in no entry (with sectional tray and sectional denture).
    Patel A; Sethuraman R; Prajapati P; Patel JR
    BMJ Case Rep; 2013 Jul; 2013():. PubMed ID: 23843416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of a novel 3D-printed custom tray for the impressions of edentulous jaws.
    Deng K; Chen H; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104279. PubMed ID: 36070825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A technique for fabricating a hinged mandibular complete dental prosthesis with swing lock for a patient with microstomia.
    Rathi N; Heshmati R; Yilmaz B; Wilson W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Dec; 110(6):540-3. PubMed ID: 24176178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A simple and effective method for prosthetic rehabilitation in scleroderma patients: a clinical report.
    Hajimahmoudi M; Mostafavi AS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 24596917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Application of stud structure to sectional upper complete denture for a patient with microstomia].
    Jiang YL; Sun J; Jiang WD; Jiao T; Zhang FQ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2007 Aug; 16(4):388-90. PubMed ID: 17924024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Microstomia Patients: A Systematic Review of Published Case Reports and Case Series.
    Patil S; Raj AT; Sarode SC; Sarode GS; Menon RK; Bhandi S; Awan KH; Khan MM; Gadbail AR; Gondivkar S; Kakkar MS; Ahmad ZH; Ferrari M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Apr; 20(4):508-515. PubMed ID: 31308286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression.
    Kim KR; Seo KY; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):543-549. PubMed ID: 30955939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with microstomia.
    Prithviraj DR; Ramaswamy S; Romesh S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):483-6. PubMed ID: 20139576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microstomia in a maxillectomy patient: A prosthetic challenge.
    Garg SK; Bansal S; Shireen RK
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2011 Jan; 2(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 22114452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Flexible, removable partial denture for a patient with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) and microstomia: a clinical report and a three-year follow-up.
    Samet N; Tau S; Findler M; Susarla SM; Findler M
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(6):548-51. PubMed ID: 18050582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fabricating sectional-collapsible complete dentures for an edentulous patient with microstomia induced by scleroderma.
    Dikbas I; Koksal T; Kazazoglu E
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Jan; 38(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 17216903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Management of Edentulous Microstomia Patient: A Case Report and Classification System.
    Abbasi MS; Ahmed N; Irfan AB; Al-Saleh S; Abduljabbar T; Vohra F
    Case Rep Dent; 2022; 2022():2686983. PubMed ID: 35154831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of hypermobile teeth deviation during impression taking in a partially edentulous dental arch: An in vitro study comparing digital and conventional impression techniques.
    Matsuno H; Wada J; Murakami N; Takakusaki K; Nagayama T; Manabe K; Nomura Y; Koyama S; Mouri Y; Li B; Sakamoto K; Kim EY; Ishioka Y; Utsumi M; Wakabayashi N
    J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39231695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous patient with limited oral access: A clinical report.
    Kumar S; Arora A; Yadav R
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2012 Jul; 3(3):349-51. PubMed ID: 23293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Benic GI; Hogsett VL; White GS; Lal K; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 21631595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of Pindex system in fabrication of the sectional custom tray.
    Jabbari E; Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):417-9. PubMed ID: 24417537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Custom double tray for a special impression technique for flabby maxillary residual ridge: Case report.
    Mostafa AZH; Alanazi SM; Almarshedy SM
    Clin Case Rep; 2022 Mar; 10(3):e05593. PubMed ID: 35340660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.