These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37902265)

  • 61. A realist review of which advocacy interventions work for which abused women under what circumstances.
    Rivas C; Vigurs C; Cameron J; Yeo L
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 6(6):CD013135. PubMed ID: 31254283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.
    Rittenmeyer L; Huffman D; Alagna M; Moore E
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Feb; 14(2):174-255. PubMed ID: 27536798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. General practitioners' knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol of a mixed methods systematic review and meta-ethnography.
    Jennings AA; Foley T; Walsh KA; Coffey A; Browne JP; Bradley CP
    Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 7(1):62. PubMed ID: 29685175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Developing a program theory of patient engagement in patient-oriented research and the impacts on the health care system: protocol for a rapid realist review.
    Zibrowski E; McDonald S; Thiessen H; VanDusen R; Boden C; Carr T; Goodridge D; Haver C; Marciniuk D; Stobart C; Verrall T; Groot G
    CMAJ Open; 2020; 8(3):E530-E534. PubMed ID: 32873581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A meta-ethnography investigating relational influences on mental health and cancer-related health care interventions for racially minoritised people in the UK.
    Ridge D; Pilkington K; Donovan S; Moschopoulou E; Gopal D; Bhui K; Chalder T; Khan I; Korszun A; Taylor S;
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0284878. PubMed ID: 37163472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review.
    Kastner M; Tricco AC; Soobiah C; Lillie E; Perrier L; Horsley T; Welch V; Cogo E; Antony J; Straus SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Aug; 12():114. PubMed ID: 22862833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Developing a conceptual model of older patients' decision-making process in choosing dialysis or conservative care using meta-ethnography.
    Kim EY; Son YJ
    J Adv Nurs; 2022 Jan; 78(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 34227152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Exploring why quality circles work in primary health care: a realist review protocol.
    Rohrbasser A; Mickan S; Harris J
    Syst Rev; 2013 Dec; 2():110. PubMed ID: 24321626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Women's experience of menopause: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.
    Hoga L; Rodolpho J; Gonçalves B; Quirino B
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Sep; 13(8):250-337. PubMed ID: 26455946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Overview of qualitative research.
    Grossoehme DH
    J Health Care Chaplain; 2014; 20(3):109-22. PubMed ID: 24926897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Protocol--realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES).
    Greenhalgh T; Wong G; Westhorp G; Pawson R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Aug; 11():115. PubMed ID: 21843376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Protocol for a realist review of workplace learning in postgraduate medical education and training.
    Wiese A; Kilty C; Bergin C; Flood P; Fu N; Horgan M; Higgins A; Maher B; O'Kane G; Prihodova L; Slattery D; Bennett D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Jan; 6(1):10. PubMed ID: 28103925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Meta-Study as Diagnostic: Toward Content Over Form in Qualitative Synthesis.
    Frost J; Garside R; Cooper C; Britten N
    Qual Health Res; 2016 Feb; 26(3):307-19. PubMed ID: 26667881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review.
    Morrow E; Zidaru T; Ross F; Mason C; Patel KD; Ream M; Stockley R
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():971044. PubMed ID: 36733854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. 'Trying to pin down jelly' - exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography.
    Toye F; Seers K; Allcock N; Briggs M; Carr E; Andrews J; Barker K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():46. PubMed ID: 23517438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Introduction to qualitative evidence synthesis - Variants and application].
    Pohontsch NJ; Hense H; Lentsch V
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2024 Aug; 63(4):238-246. PubMed ID: 38588694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care.
    Campbell R; Pound P; Pope C; Britten N; Pill R; Morgan M; Donovan J
    Soc Sci Med; 2003 Feb; 56(4):671-84. PubMed ID: 12560003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis.
    Munn Z; Pollock D; Khalil H; Alexander L; Mclnerney P; Godfrey CM; Peters M; Tricco AC
    JBI Evid Synth; 2022 Apr; 20(4):950-952. PubMed ID: 35249995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Understanding how and why de-implementation works in health and care: research protocol for a realist synthesis of evidence.
    Burton C; Williams L; Bucknall T; Edwards S; Fisher D; Hall B; Harris G; Jones P; Makin M; McBride A; Meacock R; Parkinson J; Rycroft-Malone J; Waring J
    Syst Rev; 2019 Aug; 8(1):194. PubMed ID: 31383018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.