These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37903104)

  • 1. The effect of circular stapler size on anastomotic stricture formation in colorectal surgery: A propensity score matched study.
    Lee KY; Lee J; Park YY; Kim HJ; Oh ST
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0287595. PubMed ID: 37903104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
    J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety of Small Circular Staplers in Double Stapling Technique Anastomosis for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer.
    Nagaoka T; Yamaguchi T; Nagasaki T; Akiyoshi T; Nagayama S; Fukunaga Y; Chino A; Ishizuka N; Konishi T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Aug; 64(8):937-945. PubMed ID: 33951685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.
    Vignali A; Gozzini L; Gasparini G; Calef R; Rosati R; Elmore U
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):211. PubMed ID: 37561203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidence of anastomotic leakage using powered circular staplers versus manual circular staplers for left colorectal anastomosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Pérez-Santiago L; Barrachina-Martinez I; González-de-Julián S; Vivas-Consuelo D; Espí-Macías A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2024 Jul; 28(1):76. PubMed ID: 38954099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study.
    Vanstraelen S; Coosemans W; Depypere L; Mandeville Y; Moons J; Van Veer H; Nafteux P
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 36(5):. PubMed ID: 36222069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.
    Hosoi T; Abe T; Uemura N; Higaki E; Kawai R; Kawakami J; An B; Nagino M; Shimizu Y
    World J Surg; 2019 Jul; 43(7):1746-1755. PubMed ID: 30847524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Mora-Oliver I; Gadea-Mateo R; Cozar-Lozano C; Espí-Macías A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Mar; 25(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 32914268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of the circular compression stapler and circular mechanical stapler in the end-to-side transanal colorectal anastomosis after left colon and rectal resections A single center experience.
    Pironi D; Vendettuoli M; Pontone S; Panarese A; Arcieri S; Filippini A; Grimaldi G
    Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():23-30. PubMed ID: 27025236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts.
    Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Scatizzi M;
    Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2312-2323. PubMed ID: 37195782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of the impact of EEA stapler size on risk of anastomotic complications in colorectal anastomosis: does size matter?
    Reif de Paula T; Simon H; Shah M; Lee-Kong S; Kiely JM; Kiran RP; Keller DS
    Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Apr; 24(4):283-290. PubMed ID: 32036461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.
    Wang T; Sadowsky M; Blakney R; Coplan P; Petraiuolo W; Soberman M; Tomaszewski J; Rene L; Wood J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 38(1):264. PubMed ID: 37932486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk Factors Associated with the Development of Colorectal Anastomotic Strictures Prior to Diverting Loop Ileostomy Reversal.
    Sandilos G; Zhu C; Giugliano DN; Kwiatt M; Wang YR; Hunter K; McClane SJ
    Am Surg; 2023 May; 89(5):1654-1660. PubMed ID: 35068200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modified Collard technique is more effective than circular stapled for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a propensity score-matched study.
    Takeoka T; Miyata H; Sugimura K; Kanemura T; Sugase T; Yamamoto M; Shinno N; Hara H; Fujii Y; Mukai Y; Asukai K; Mikamori M; Hasegawa S; Akita H; Haraguchi N; Nishimura J; Wada H; Matsuda C; Omori T; Yasui M; Ohue M; Yano M
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 36(5):. PubMed ID: 37122247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incidence and outcome of anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic gastric bypass.
    Nguyen NT; Stevens CM; Wolfe BM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2003 Dec; 7(8):997-1003; discussion 1003. PubMed ID: 14675709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complications at gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparison between 21- and 25-mm circular staplers.
    Suggs WJ; Kouli W; Lupovici M; Chau WY; Brolin RE
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2007; 3(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 17686661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis using the novel Chex(®) circular stapler: a case-control study.
    Maggiori L; Bretagnol F; Ferron M; Chevalier Y; Panis Y
    Colorectal Dis; 2011 Jun; 13(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 20184634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linear Stapler versus Circular Stapler for Patients Undergoing Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Gastric Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.
    Jin T; Liu HD; Chen ZH; Hu JK; Yang K
    J Invest Surg; 2022 Jul; 35(7):1434-1444. PubMed ID: 35435081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.