126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37903555)
1. Computed tomography calcium scoring in aortic stenosis: bicuspid versus tricuspid morphology.
Ye Z; Clavel MA; Foley TA; Pibarot P; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
Heart; 2024 Mar; 110(8):594-602. PubMed ID: 37903555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sex-Specific Differences in Aortic Valve Calcification Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Severe Aortic Stenosis.
Veulemans V; Hokken TW; Heermann J; Kardys I; Maier O; Adrichem R; Ooms J; Nuis RJ; Daemen J; Hirsch A; Budde RP; Zeus T; Van Mieghem NM
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Jun; 197():87-92. PubMed ID: 37137798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic Implications of Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valve Phenotype on Progression of Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Ascending Aorta Dilatation.
Chew NWS; Phua K; Ho YJ; Zhang A; Lin N; Ngiam JN; Lau YX; Teo VXY; Sia CH; Loh PH; Kuntjoro I; Wong RCC; Lee CH; Tan HC; Yeo TC; Kong WKF; Poh KK
Am J Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 161():76-83. PubMed ID: 34627597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of age and aortic valve anatomy on calcification and haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis.
Shen M; Tastet L; Capoulade R; Larose É; Bédard É; Arsenault M; Chetaille P; Dumesnil JG; Mathieu P; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
Heart; 2017 Jan; 103(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 27504001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aortic Stenosis Progression, Cardiac Damage, and Survival: Comparison Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves.
Yang LT; Boler A; Medina-Inojosa JR; Scott CG; Maurer MJ; Eleid MF; Enriquez-Sarano M; Tribouilloy C; Michelena HI
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jun; 14(6):1113-1126. PubMed ID: 33744153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Impact of bicuspid aortic valve or tricuspid aortic valve on hemodynamics and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement].
Zhang JQ; Chi CW; Zhao WL; Meng QT; Wang LD; Liu JY; Sun FZ; Zhang SL; Liu JH
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 50(12):1193-1200. PubMed ID: 36517440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Demonstrate Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling and Impaired Cardiac Function Before Surgery With Increased Risk of Postoperative Heart Failure.
Wedin JO; Vedin O; Rodin S; Simonson OE; Hörsne Malmborg J; Pallin J; James SK; Flachskampf FA; Ståhle E; Grinnemo KH
Circulation; 2022 Oct; 146(17):1310-1322. PubMed ID: 35971843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of bicuspid vs. tricuspid aortic valve stenosis.
Huntley GD; Thaden JJ; Alsidawi S; Michelena HI; Maleszewski JJ; Edwards WD; Scott CG; Pislaru SV; Pellikka PA; Greason KL; Ammash NM; Malouf JF; Enriquez-Sarano M; Nkomo VT
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 29029001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computed Tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Shen M; Oh JK; Guzzetti E; Singh GK; Pawade T; Tastet L; Clavel MA; Delgado V; Bax JJ; Dweck MR; Abbas AE; Mando R; Falconi ML; Perez de Arenaza D; Poh KK; Kong W; Tay E; Pressman G; Brito D; Song JK; Pibarot P
Struct Heart; 2022 Apr; 6(1):100027. PubMed ID: 37273477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Higher rate of aortic stenosis progression in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve - A single center experience.
Hamala P; Kasprzak JD; Lipiec P; Sobczak-Kaleta M; Wierzbowska-Drabik K
Adv Med Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(2):343-350. PubMed ID: 34280706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the aortic valve calcium content in the bicuspid and tricuspid stenotic aortic valve using non-enhanced 64-detector-row-computed tomography with prospective ECG-triggering.
Ferda J; Linhartová K; Kreuzberg B
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):471-5. PubMed ID: 17961946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.
Clavel MA; Messika-Zeitoun D; Pibarot P; Aggarwal SR; Malouf J; Araoz PA; Michelena HI; Cueff C; Larose E; Capoulade R; Vahanian A; Enriquez-Sarano M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 62(24):2329-38. PubMed ID: 24076528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Less pronounced reverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to tricuspid aortic stenosis.
Xiong TY; Wang X; Li YJ; Liao YB; Zhao ZG; Wei X; Xu YN; Zheng MX; Zhou X; Peng Y; Wei JF; Feng Y; Chen M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 34(11):1761-1767. PubMed ID: 29915878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease and Stenosis: The National Echo Database of Australia.
Lim MS; Strange G; Playford D; Stewart S; Celermajer DS
J Am Heart Assoc; 2021 Sep; 10(17):e020785. PubMed ID: 34459236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fused aortic valve without an elliptical-shaped systolic orifice in patients with severe aortic stenosis: cardiac computed tomography is useful for differentiation between bicuspid aortic valve with raphe and tricuspid aortic valve with commissural fusion.
Bak SH; Ko SM; Song MG; Shin JK; Chee HK; Kim JS
Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):1208-17. PubMed ID: 25424562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multichamber Strain Characterization Is a Robust Prognosticator for Both Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis.
Ye Z; Yang LT; Medina-Inojosa JR; Scott CG; Padang R; Luis SA; Nkomo VT; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2022 Sep; 35(9):956-965. PubMed ID: 35613661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Persistence of Reduced Left Ventricular Function after Aortic Valve Surgery for Aortic Valve Regurgitation: Bicuspid versus Tricuspid.
Petersen J; Neumann N; Naito S; Sequeira Gross T; Massel R; Reichenspurner H; Girdauskas E
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Aug; 69(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 31299697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves.
Sia CH; Ho JS; Chua JJ; Tan BY; Ngiam NJ; Chew N; Sim HW; Chen R; Lee CH; Yeo TC; Kong WK; Poh KK
Am J Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 128():210-215. PubMed ID: 32534732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aortic annulus and root characteristics in severe aortic stenosis due to bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valves: implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapies.
Philip F; Faza NN; Schoenhagen P; Desai MY; Tuzcu EM; Svensson LG; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):E88-98. PubMed ID: 25914355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype on progression of aortic stenosis.
Shen M; Tastet L; Capoulade R; Arsenault M; Bédard É; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jul; 21(7):727-734. PubMed ID: 32386199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
