158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37903749)
1. Impact of genotype-calling methodologies on genome-wide association and genomic prediction in polyploids.
Njuguna JN; Clark LV; Lipka AE; Anzoua KG; Bagmet L; Chebukin P; Dwiyanti MS; Dzyubenko E; Dzyubenko N; Ghimire BK; Jin X; Johnson DA; Kjeldsen JB; Nagano H; de Bem Oliveira I; Peng J; Petersen KK; Sabitov A; Seong ES; Yamada T; Yoo JH; Yu CY; Zhao H; Munoz P; Long SP; Sacks EJ
Plant Genome; 2023 Dec; 16(4):e20401. PubMed ID: 37903749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. polyRAD: Genotype Calling with Uncertainty from Sequencing Data in Polyploids and Diploids.
Clark LV; Lipka AE; Sacks EJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Mar; 9(3):663-673. PubMed ID: 30655271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advantages of continuous genotype values over genotype classes for GWAS in higher polyploids: a comparative study in hexaploid chrysanthemum.
Grandke F; Singh P; Heuven HC; de Haan JR; Metzler D
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):672. PubMed ID: 27554097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic prediction based on selected variants from imputed whole-genome sequence data in Australian sheep populations.
Moghaddar N; Khansefid M; van der Werf JHJ; Bolormaa S; Duijvesteijn N; Clark SA; Swan AA; Daetwyler HD; MacLeod IM
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Dec; 51(1):72. PubMed ID: 31805849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic Prediction of Autotetraploids; Influence of Relationship Matrices, Allele Dosage, and Continuous Genotyping Calls in Phenotype Prediction.
de Bem Oliveira I; Resende MFR; Ferrão LFV; Amadeu RR; Endelman JB; Kirst M; Coelho ASG; Munoz PR
G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Apr; 9(4):1189-1198. PubMed ID: 30782769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of genotyping errors on statistical power of association tests in genomic analyses: A case study.
Hou L; Sun N; Mane S; Sayward F; Rajeevan N; Cheung KH; Cho K; Pyarajan S; Aslan M; Miller P; Harvey PD; Gaziano JM; Concato J; Zhao H
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 41(2):152-162. PubMed ID: 28019059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GAPIT Version 3: Boosting Power and Accuracy for Genomic Association and Prediction.
Wang J; Zhang Z
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2021 Aug; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 34492338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interpretable artificial neural networks incorporating Bayesian alphabet models for genome-wide prediction and association studies.
Zhao T; Fernando R; Cheng H
G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34499126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Multiple-Trait Bayesian Variable Selection Regression Method for Integrating Phenotypic Causal Networks in Genome-Wide Association Studies.
Wang Z; Chapman D; Morota G; Cheng H
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Dec; 10(12):4439-4448. PubMed ID: 33020191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic prediction based on selective linkage disequilibrium pruning of low-coverage whole-genome sequence variants in a pure Duroc population.
Zhu D; Zhao Y; Zhang R; Wu H; Cai G; Wu Z; Wang Y; Hu X
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Oct; 55(1):72. PubMed ID: 37853325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fast imputation using medium or low-coverage sequence data.
VanRaden PM; Sun C; O'Connell JR
BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():82. PubMed ID: 26168789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of genotyping-by-sequencing analysis methods on low-coverage crop datasets shows advantages of a new workflow, GB-eaSy.
Wickland DP; Battu G; Hudson KA; Diers BW; Hudson ME
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):586. PubMed ID: 29281959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of whole-genome sequence data and novel genomic selection strategies to improve selection for age at puberty in tropically-adapted beef heifers.
Warburton CL; Engle BN; Ross EM; Costilla R; Moore SS; Corbet NJ; Allen JM; Laing AR; Fordyce G; Lyons RE; McGowan MR; Burns BM; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 May; 52(1):28. PubMed ID: 32460805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating Imputation Algorithms for Low-Depth Genotyping-By-Sequencing (GBS) Data.
Chan AW; Hamblin MT; Jannink JL
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160733. PubMed ID: 27537694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genome-Wide Association Study and Cost-Efficient Genomic Predictions for Growth and Fillet Yield in Nile Tilapia (
Yoshida GM; Lhorente JP; Correa K; Soto J; Salas D; Yáñez JM
G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Aug; 9(8):2597-2607. PubMed ID: 31171566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for meat tenderness in Polled Nellore cattle.
Magnabosco CU; Lopes FB; Fragoso RC; Eifert EC; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Sainz RD
J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):2752-60. PubMed ID: 27482662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating variations of genotype calling: a potential source of spurious associations in genome-wide association studies.
Hong H; Su Z; Ge W; Shi L; Perkins R; Fang H; Mendrick D; Tong W
J Genet; 2010 Apr; 89(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 20505247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic prediction using preselected DNA variants from a GWAS with whole-genome sequence data in Holstein-Friesian cattle.
Veerkamp RF; Bouwman AC; Schrooten C; Calus MP
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Dec; 48(1):95. PubMed ID: 27905878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
