These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37903972)
1. Impact of Neoadjuvant Treatment and Minimally Invasive Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Pancreatoduodenectomy: an ACS NSQIP Analysis. Al Abbas AI; Meier J; Hester CA; Radi I; Yan J; Zhu H; Mansour JC; Porembka MR; Wang SC; Yopp AC; Zeh HJ; Polanco PM J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Dec; 27(12):2823-2842. PubMed ID: 37903972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved outcomes with minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with dilated pancreatic ducts: a prospective study. Cos H; LeCompte MT; Srinivasa S; Zarate Rodriguez J; Woolsey CA; Williams G; Patel S; Khan A; Fields RC; Majella Doyle MB; Chapman WC; Strasberg SM; Hawkins WG; Hammill CW; Sanford DE Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3100-3109. PubMed ID: 34235587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy. Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Yan JF; Pan Y; Chen K; Zhu HP; Chen QL Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Aug; 98(32):e16730. PubMed ID: 31393381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Operative Time on Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy. Williams MD; Bhama AR; Naffouje S; Kamarajah SK; Becerra AZ; Zhang Y; Pappas SG; Dahdaleh FS J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jan; 27(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 36357742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. de Graaf N; Emmen AMLH; Ramera M; Björnsson B; Boggi U; Bruna CL; Busch OR; Daams F; Ferrari G; Festen S; van Hilst J; D'Hondt M; Ielpo B; Keck T; Khatkov IE; Koerkamp BG; Lips DJ; Luyer MDP; Mieog JSD; Morelli L; Molenaar IQ; van Santvoort HC; Sprangers MAG; Ferrari C; Berkhof J; Maisonneuve P; Abu Hilal M; Besselink MG; Trials; 2023 Oct; 24(1):665. PubMed ID: 37828593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open? Gumbs AA; Chouillard E; Abu Hilal M; Croner R; Gayet B; Gagner M Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5256-5267. PubMed ID: 33146810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials. Uijterwijk BA; Wei K; Kasai M; Ielpo B; Hilst JV; Chinnusamy P; Lemmers DHL; Burdio F; Senthilnathan P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M; Qin R Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 37076411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism when compared to the open approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancellotti F; Patel A; Coletta D; de Liguori-Carino N; Satyadas T; Barrie J; Siriwardena AK; Jamdar S Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Jul; 50(7):108314. PubMed ID: 38703631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Uijterwijk BA; Kasai M; Lemmers DHL; Chinnusamy P; van Hilst J; Ielpo B; Wei K; Song KB; Kim SC; Klompmaker S; Jang JY; Herremans KM; Bencini L; Coratti A; Mazzola M; Menon KV; Goh BKP; Qin R; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M; Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Aug; 408(1):311. PubMed ID: 37581763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery. Chen K; Pan Y; Liu XL; Jiang GY; Wu D; Maher H; Cai XJ BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 29169337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing open and minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: a population-based study. Chang JH; Kakati RT; Wehrle C; Naples R; Joyce D; Augustin T; Simon R; Walsh RM; Dahdaleh FS; Spanheimer P; Salti I; Parente A; Naffouje SA J Minim Invasive Surg; 2024 Jun; 27(2):95-108. PubMed ID: 38887001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wrapping double-mattress anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy can significantly reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula rate compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy in open surgery: An analysis of a propensity score-matched sample. Kiguchi G; Sugioka A; Uchida Y; Yoshikawa J; Nakauchi M; Kojima M; Tanahashi Y; Takahara T; Yasuda A; Suda K; Kato Y; Uyama I Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101577. PubMed ID: 33887674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study. Uijterwijk BA; Lemmers DHL; Bolm L; Luyer M; Koh YX; Mazzola M; Webber L; Kazemier G; Bannone E; Ramaekers M; Ielpo B; Wellner U; Koek S; Giani A; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M; Ann Surg; 2023 Sep; 278(3):e570-e579. PubMed ID: 36730852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive vs open pancreatoduodenectomy on oncological adequacy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Ashouri Y; Ho K; Ho H; Hsu CH; Ghaderi I; Riall TS; Konstantinidis IT; Maegawa FB Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7302-7311. PubMed ID: 35178590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: uncomplicated ends justify the means. Naffouje SA; Pointer DT; Satyadi MA; Hodul P; Anaya DA; Pimiento J; Malafa M; Kim DW; Fleming JB; Denbo JW Surg Endosc; 2022 Jul; 36(7):4912-4922. PubMed ID: 34859301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a propensity score-matched analysis. Yin SM; Liu YW; Liu YY; Yong CC; Wang CC; Li WF; Yeh CH BMC Surg; 2021 Jan; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 33494734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers. Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive approaches increase postoperative complications in obese patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy during the initial development period: a propensity score matching study. Wei TH; Su PJ; Lu WH; Liao TK; Wang CJ; Lai CH; Chiu PH; Su PF; Chao YJ; Shan YS Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):2770-2780. PubMed ID: 36477639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrepancies in survival after conversion to open in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy. Villano AM; Ruth K; Castellanos J; Farma JM; Reddy SS Am J Surg; 2023 Apr; 225(4):728-734. PubMed ID: 36333156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]