176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37903972)
21. Comparison of postoperative complications and long-term oncological outcomes in minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Kim SH; Lee B; Hwang HK; Lee JS; Han HS; Lee WJ; Yoon YS; Kang CM
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Mar; 29(3):329-337. PubMed ID: 34717038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Outcomes After Minimally-invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study.
Klompmaker S; van Hilst J; Wellner UF; Busch OR; Coratti A; D'Hondt M; Dokmak S; Festen S; Kerem M; Khatkov I; Lips DJ; Lombardo C; Luyer M; Manzoni A; Molenaar IQ; Rosso E; Saint-Marc O; Vansteenkiste F; Wittel UA; Bonsing B; Groot Koerkamp B; Abu Hilal M; Fuks D; Poves I; Keck T; Boggi U; Besselink MG;
Ann Surg; 2020 Feb; 271(2):356-363. PubMed ID: 29864089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Propensity-Matched Analysis of Postoperative Complications Using ACS-NSQIP.
Krell RW; McNeil LR; Yanala UR; Are C; Reames BN
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 28(7):3810-3822. PubMed ID: 33386542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of outcomes.
Lee W; Song KB; Hong S; Park Y; Kwak BJ; Jun E; Hwang DW; Kim S; Lee JH; Kim SC
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):881-890. PubMed ID: 36018360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Long-term survival after minimally invasive resection versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Kamarajah SK; Gujjuri R; Bundred JR; Hilal MA; White SA
HPB (Oxford); 2021 Feb; 23(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 33077373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Minimally invasive surgical approach versus open procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang S; Shi N; You L; Dai M; Zhao Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e8619. PubMed ID: 29390259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Kwon J; Song KB; Park SY; Shin D; Hong S; Park Y; Lee W; Lee JH; Hwang DW; Kim SC
Cancers (Basel); 2020 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 32326595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhu J; Wang G; Du P; He J; Li Y
World J Surg; 2021 Apr; 45(4):1186-1201. PubMed ID: 33458781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. International survey on opinions and use of robot-assisted and laparoscopic minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: 5-year follow up.
van Ramshorst TME; van Hilst J; Bannone E; Pulvirenti A; Asbun HJ; Boggi U; Busch OR; Dokmak S; Edwin B; Hogg M; Jang JY; Keck T; Khatkov I; Kohan G; Kokudo N; Kooby DA; Nakamura M; Primrose JN; Siriwardena AK; Toso C; Vollmer CM; Zeh HJ; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
HPB (Oxford); 2024 Jan; 26(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 37739876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Utilization of chemoradiation therapy provides strongest protective effect for avoidance of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A NSQIP analysis.
Mangieri CW; Strode MA; Moaven O; Clark CJ; Shen P
J Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 122(8):1604-1611. PubMed ID: 32935353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Getting Started with Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is It Worth It?
Liang S; Jayaraman S
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Sep; 25(9):712-9. PubMed ID: 26375771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Robotic vs Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula.
McMillan MT; Zureikat AH; Hogg ME; Kowalsky SJ; Zeh HJ; Sprys MH; Vollmer CM
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):327-335. PubMed ID: 28030724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery in the European E-MIPS registry.
van der Heijde N; Vissers FL; Manzoni A; Zimmitti G; Balsells J; Berrevoet F; Bjornsson B; van den Boezem P; Boggi U; Bratlie SO; Burdio F; Coratti A; D'Hondt M; Del Pozo CD; Dokmak S; Fara R; Can MF; Festen S; Forgione A; Fristrup C; Gaujoux S; Groot Koerkamp B; Hackert T; Khatkov IE; Keck T; Seppänen H; Lips D; Luyer M; Pittau G; Maglione M; Molenaar IQ; Pessaux P; Roeyen G; Saint-Marc O; Cabus SS; van Santvoort H; van der Schelling G; Serradilla-Martin M; Souche FR; Suarez Muñoz MÁ; Marino MV; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
HPB (Oxford); 2023 Apr; 25(4):400-408. PubMed ID: 37028826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Cohort and Registry Studies.
de Rooij T; Lu MZ; Steen MW; Gerhards MF; Dijkgraaf MG; Busch OR; Lips DJ; Festen S; Besselink MG;
Ann Surg; 2016 Aug; 264(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 26863398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Implementation and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy in Europe: a registry-based retrospective study - a critical appraisal of the first 3 years of the E-MIPS registry.
Emmen AMLH; de Graaf N; Khatkov IE; Busch OR; Dokmak S; Boggi U; Groot Koerkamp B; Ferrari G; Molenaar IQ; Saint-Marc O; Ramera M; Lips DJ; Mieog JSD; Luyer MDP; Keck T; D'Hondt M; Souche FR; Edwin B; Hackert T; Liem MSL; Iben-Khayat A; van Santvoort HC; Mazzola M; de Wilde RF; Kauffmann EF; Aussilhou B; Festen S; Izrailov R; Tyutyunnik P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Int J Surg; 2024 Apr; 110(4):2226-2233. PubMed ID: 38265434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy.
Kendrick ML; van Hilst J; Boggi U; de Rooij T; Walsh RM; Zeh HJ; Hughes SJ; Nakamura Y; Vollmer CM; Kooby DA; Asbun HJ;
HPB (Oxford); 2017 Mar; 19(3):215-224. PubMed ID: 28317658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms.
Bao PQ; Mazirka PO; Watkins KT
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Apr; 18(4):682-9. PubMed ID: 24234245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Updated Alternative Fistula Risk Score (ua-FRS) to Include Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: Pan-European Validation.
Mungroop TH; Klompmaker S; Wellner UF; Steyerberg EW; Coratti A; D'Hondt M; de Pastena M; Dokmak S; Khatkov I; Saint-Marc O; Wittel U; Abu Hilal M; Fuks D; Poves I; Keck T; Boggi U; Besselink MG;
Ann Surg; 2021 Feb; 273(2):334-340. PubMed ID: 30829699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Duodenopancreatectomy: open or minimally invasive approach?
Nigri G; Petrucciani N; La Torre M; Magistri P; Valabrega S; Aurello P; Ramacciato G
Surgeon; 2014 Aug; 12(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 24525404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Independent Predictors of Increased Operative Time and Hospital Length of Stay Are Consistent Across Different Surgical Approaches to Pancreatoduodenectomy.
Xourafas D; Pawlik TM; Cloyd JM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Nov; 22(11):1911-1919. PubMed ID: 29943136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
