161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37905611)
21. Is oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) of prognostic value once HER2-positive and. low-ER expression patients are removed?
Milburn M; Rosman M; Mylander C; Tafra L
Breast J; 2013; 19(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 23701403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Selection of neoadjuvant treatment based on the 21-GENE test results in luminal breast cancer.
Morales Murillo S; Gasol Cudos A; Veas Rodriguez J; Canosa Morales C; Melé Olivé J; Vilardell Villellas F; Sanchez Guzman DR; Iglesias Martínez E; Salud Salvia A
Breast; 2021 Apr; 56():35-41. PubMed ID: 33601299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of Genomic Assay Testing and Clinical Factors on Chemotherapy Use After Implementation of Standardized Testing Criteria.
Natsuhara KH; Losk K; King TA; Lin NU; Camuso K; Golshan M; Pochebit S; Brock JE; Bunnell CA; Freedman RA
Oncologist; 2019 May; 24(5):595-602. PubMed ID: 30076279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(23):1-57. PubMed ID: 23074401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Gene-expression Profiling - A Decision Impact Analysis: Decision Dependency on Oncotype DX® as a Function of Oncological Work Experience in 117 Cases.
Eichler C; Fromme J; Thangarajah F; Puppe J; Paepke S; Warm M; Malter W
Anticancer Res; 2019 Jan; 39(1):297-303. PubMed ID: 30591472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Utility of Oncotype DX Risk Assessment in Patients With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.
Tsai ML; Lillemoe TJ; Finkelstein MJ; Money JE; Susnik B; Grimm E; Kang SH; Swenson KK
Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Feb; 16(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 26385397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Can features evaluated in the routine pathologic assessment of lymph node-negative estrogen receptor-positive stage I or II invasive breast cancer be used to predict the Oncotype DX recurrence score?
Auerbach J; Kim M; Fineberg S
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Nov; 134(11):1697-701. PubMed ID: 21043825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of Oncotype DX on treatment decisions in ER-positive, node-negative breast cancer with histologic correlation.
Biroschak JR; Schwartz GF; Palazzo JP; Toll AD; Brill KL; Jaslow RJ; Lee SY
Breast J; 2013; 19(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 23614365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Association between partial-volume corrected SUVmax and Oncotype DX recurrence score in early-stage, ER-positive/HER2-negative invasive breast cancer.
Lee SH; Ha S; An HJ; Lee JS; Han W; Im SA; Ryu HS; Kim WH; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK; Cheon GJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Aug; 43(9):1574-84. PubMed ID: 27209424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The impact of a genomic assay (Oncotype DX) on adjuvant treatment recommendations in early breast cancer.
de Boer RH; Baker C; Speakman D; Chao CY; Yoshizawa C; Mann GB
Med J Aust; 2013 Aug; 199(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 23909545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The impact of Oncotype DX testing on adjuvant chemotherapy decision making in 1-3 node positive breast cancer.
Malam Y; Rabie M; Geropantas K; Alexander S; Pain S; Youssef M
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 Aug; 5(8):e1546. PubMed ID: 34664429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Association between Oncotype DX recurrence score and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI features in patients with estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative invasive breast cancer.
Kim HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Clin Imaging; 2021 Jul; 75():131-137. PubMed ID: 33548871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast and Utility of Oncotype Dx®: a Retrospective Decision Impact Analysis.
Barni S; Fabi A; Petrelli F
Clin Breast Cancer; 2023 Apr; 23(3):e173-e174. PubMed ID: 36586733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of Oncotype DX breast Recurrence Score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy use in early breast cancer: Real world experience in Greater Manchester, UK.
Loncaster J; Armstrong A; Howell S; Wilson G; Welch R; Chittalia A; Valentine WJ; Bundred NJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 43(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28111076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: does the use of Oncotype DX tumor gene expression profiling to guide treatment decisions improve outcomes in patients with breast cancer?
Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Working Group*
Genet Med; 2016 Aug; 18(8):770-9. PubMed ID: 26681310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical significance of 21-gene recurrence score assay for hormone receptor-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer in early stage.
Yu-Qing Y; Lei W; Mei-Ling H; Jing-Jing X; Mei-Chen W; Jiang W; Jun-Sheng H; Rui L; Nan-Lin L
Exp Mol Pathol; 2019 Jun; 108():150-155. PubMed ID: 31026440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Racial disparities in omission of oncotype DX but no racial disparities in chemotherapy receipt following completed oncotype DX test results.
Press DJ; Ibraheem A; Dolan ME; Goss KH; Conzen S; Huo D
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Feb; 168(1):207-220. PubMed ID: 29181717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of Oncotype DX testing on ER+ breast cancer treatment and survival in the first decade of use.
Schaafsma E; Zhang B; Schaafsma M; Tong CY; Zhang L; Cheng C
Breast Cancer Res; 2021 Jul; 23(1):74. PubMed ID: 34274003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Oncotype DX testing in node-positive breast cancer strongly impacts chemotherapy use at a comprehensive cancer center.
Losk K; Freedman RA; Laws A; Kantor O; Mittendorf EA; Tan-Wasielewski Z; Trippa L; Lin NU; Winer EP; King TA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jan; 185(1):215-227. PubMed ID: 32939592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A preliminary report of head-to-head comparison of 18-gene-based clinical-genomic model and oncotype DX 21-gene assay for predicting recurrence of early-stage breast cancer.
Yang PS; Lee YH; Chung CF; Chang YC; Wang MY; Lo C; Tsai LW; Shih KH; Lei J; Yu BL; Cheng SH; Huang CS
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2019 Dec; 49(11):1029-1036. PubMed ID: 31287883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
