BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37906322)

  • 1. Influence of the mating design on the additive genetic variance in plant breeding populations.
    Lanzl T; Melchinger AE; Schön CC
    Theor Appl Genet; 2023 Oct; 136(11):236. PubMed ID: 37906322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation of the parental genome contribution in segregating populations derived from biparental crosses and its relationship with heterosis of their Design III progenies.
    Melchinger AE; Dhillon BS; Mi X
    Theor Appl Genet; 2010 Jan; 120(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 19911161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Persistency of Prediction Accuracy and Genetic Gain in Synthetic Populations Under Recurrent Genomic Selection.
    Müller D; Schopp P; Melchinger AE
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Mar; 7(3):801-811. PubMed ID: 28064189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: I. Optimizing the training set design.
    Melchinger AE; Fernando R; Stricker C; Schön CC; Auinger HJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2023 Aug; 136(8):176. PubMed ID: 37532821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: II. Reciprocal recurrent genomic selection with full-sib and half-sib families.
    Melchinger AE; Frisch M
    Theor Appl Genet; 2023 Aug; 136(9):203. PubMed ID: 37653062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic prediction with multiple biparental families.
    Brauner PC; Müller D; Molenaar WS; Melchinger AE
    Theor Appl Genet; 2020 Jan; 133(1):133-147. PubMed ID: 31595337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation from the genetic variance components in the parental lines.
    Duenk P; Bijma P; Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Feb; 53(1):10. PubMed ID: 33541267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Synthetic Populations Depending on the Number of Parents, Relatedness, and Ancestral Linkage Disequilibrium.
    Schopp P; Müller D; Technow F; Melchinger AE
    Genetics; 2017 Jan; 205(1):441-454. PubMed ID: 28049710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting the impact of genotype-by-genotype interaction on the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation from phenotype and genotype marker data of parental lines.
    Duenk P; Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Iversen MW; Lopes MS; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jan; 55(1):2. PubMed ID: 36639760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic Prediction Within and Across Biparental Families: Means and Variances of Prediction Accuracy and Usefulness of Deterministic Equations.
    Schopp P; Müller D; Wientjes YCJ; Melchinger AE
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Nov; 7(11):3571-3586. PubMed ID: 28916649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Models to estimate genetic gain of soybean seed yield from annual multi-environment field trials.
    Krause MD; Piepho HP; Dias KOG; Singh AK; Beavis WD
    Theor Appl Genet; 2023 Nov; 136(12):252. PubMed ID: 37987845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Impact of Non-additive Effects on the Genetic Correlation Between Populations.
    Duenk P; Bijma P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; van der Werf JHJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Feb; 10(2):783-795. PubMed ID: 31857332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gene stacking strategies with doubled haploids derived from biparental crosses: theory and simulations assuming a finite number of loci.
    Melchinger AE; Technow F; Dhillon BS
    Theor Appl Genet; 2011 Dec; 123(8):1269-79. PubMed ID: 21811817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Average semivariance yields accurate estimates of the fraction of marker-associated genetic variance and heritability in complex trait analyses.
    Feldmann MJ; Piepho HP; Bridges WC; Knapp SJ
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1009762. PubMed ID: 34437540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EVOLUTIONARY PREDICTABILITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS: DO MATING SYSTEM AND NONADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE INTERACT TO AFFECT HERITABILITIES IN PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA?
    Tonsor SJ; Goodnight CJ
    Evolution; 1997 Dec; 51(6):1773-1784. PubMed ID: 28565103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic parameters and genomic breeding values for digital dermatitis in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle: host susceptibility, infectivity and the basic reproduction ratio.
    Biemans F; de Jong MCM; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Nov; 51(1):67. PubMed ID: 31747869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of linkage disequilibrium estimated from genotypes versus haplotypes for crossbred populations.
    Alemu SW; Bijma P; Calus MPL; Liu H; Fernando RL; Dekkers JCM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Feb; 54(1):12. PubMed ID: 35135468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variance of neutral genetic variances within and between populations for a quantitative character.
    Zeng ZB; Cockerham CC
    Genetics; 1991 Oct; 129(2):535-53. PubMed ID: 1743490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation of body weight in broiler chickens with pedigree or genomic relationships.
    Duenk P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Breen VP; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Feb; 51(1):6. PubMed ID: 30782121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic mating in outbred species: predicting cross usefulness with additive and total genetic covariance matrices.
    Wolfe MD; Chan AW; Kulakow P; Rabbi I; Jannink JL
    Genetics; 2021 Nov; 219(3):. PubMed ID: 34740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.