These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37906322)

  • 61. QTL mapping in outbred tetraploid (and diploid) diallel populations.
    Amadeu RR; Muñoz PR; Zheng C; Endelman JB
    Genetics; 2021 Nov; 219(3):. PubMed ID: 34740237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci in multiple line crosses.
    Yi N; Xu S
    Genetica; 2002 Apr; 114(3):217-30. PubMed ID: 12206360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A fast indirect method to compute functions of genomic relationships concerning genotyped and ungenotyped individuals, for diversity management.
    Colleau JJ; Palhière I; Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):87. PubMed ID: 29191178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Mitigation of inbreeding while preserving genetic gain in genomic breeding programs for outbred plants.
    Lin Z; Shi F; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Theor Appl Genet; 2017 May; 130(5):969-980. PubMed ID: 28364262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Genomic prediction for hastening and improving efficiency of forward selection in conifer polycross mating designs: an example from white spruce.
    Lenz PRN; Nadeau S; Azaiez A; Gérardi S; Deslauriers M; Perron M; Isabel N; Beaulieu J; Bousquet J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2020 Apr; 124(4):562-578. PubMed ID: 31969718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Estimating effective population size from temporally spaced samples with a novel, efficient maximum-likelihood algorithm.
    Hui TY; Burt A
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):285-93. PubMed ID: 25747459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Refining the Use of Linkage Disequilibrium as a Robust Signature of Selective Sweeps.
    Jacobs GS; Sluckin TJ; Kivisild T
    Genetics; 2016 Aug; 203(4):1807-25. PubMed ID: 27516617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Revisiting hybrid breeding designs using genomic predictions: simulations highlight the superiority of incomplete factorials between segregating families over topcross designs.
    Seye AI; Bauland C; Charcosset A; Moreau L
    Theor Appl Genet; 2020 Jun; 133(6):1995-2010. PubMed ID: 32185420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding.
    Plate M; Bernstein R; Hoppe A; Bienefeld K
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Dec; 51(1):74. PubMed ID: 31830903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Maintenance of Quantitative Genetic Variance Under Partial Self-Fertilization, with Implications for Evolution of Selfing.
    Lande R; Porcher E
    Genetics; 2015 Jul; 200(3):891-906. PubMed ID: 25969460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparing pedigree and genomic inbreeding coefficients, and inbreeding depression of reproductive traits in Japanese Black cattle.
    Nishio M; Inoue K; Ogawa S; Ichinoseki K; Arakawa A; Fukuzawa Y; Okamura T; Kobayashi E; Taniguchi M; Oe M; Ishii K
    BMC Genomics; 2023 Jul; 24(1):376. PubMed ID: 37403068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Mathematical Constraints on
    Alcala N; Rosenberg NA
    Genetics; 2017 Jul; 206(3):1581-1600. PubMed ID: 28476869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Temporal and genomic analysis of additive genetic variance in breeding programmes.
    Lara LAC; Pocrnic I; Oliveira TP; Gaynor RC; Gorjanc G
    Heredity (Edinb); 2022 Jan; 128(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 34912044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A comparison of identity-by-descent and identity-by-state matrices that are used for genetic evaluation and estimation of variance components.
    Fernando RL; Cheng H; Sun X; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):213-223. PubMed ID: 28508481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Bias in the prediction of genetic gain due to mass and half-sib selection in random mating populations.
    Viana JM; Faria VR; Silva Ada C
    Genet Mol Biol; 2009 Jul; 32(3):497-506. PubMed ID: 21637512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Factors influencing QTL mapping accuracy under complicated genetic models by computer simulation.
    Su CF; Wang W; Gong SL; Zuo JH; Li SJ
    Genet Mol Res; 2016 Dec; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 28002599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The contribution of quantitative trait loci and neutral marker loci to the genetic variances and covariances among quantitative traits in random mating populations.
    Ruiz A; Barbadilla A
    Genetics; 1995 Jan; 139(1):445-55. PubMed ID: 7705644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Targeted Recombinant Progeny: a design for ultra-high resolution mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci in crosses between inbred or pure lines.
    Heifetz EM; Soller M
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():76. PubMed ID: 26148479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Analysis of cytoplasmic and maternal effects I. A genetic model for diploid plant seeds and animals.
    Zhu J; Weir BS
    Theor Appl Genet; 1994 Oct; 89(2-3):153-9. PubMed ID: 24177822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.