These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37907569)

  • 1. Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Heine J; Fowler EEE; Weinfurtner RJ; Hume E; Tworoger SS
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18760. PubMed ID: 37907569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast Density Analysis Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Heine J; Fowler EEE; Weinfurtner RJ; Hume E; Tworoger SS
    bioRxiv; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36824710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
    Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing recall rates following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis to synthetic 2D images and digital mammography on women with breast-conserving surgery.
    Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim GR; Han K; Kim MJ; Park VY; Moon HJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6072-6079. PubMed ID: 32529566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: per-view analysis.
    Gennaro G; Bernardi D; Houssami N
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):573-581. PubMed ID: 28819862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
    Castillo-García M; Chevalier M; Garayoa J; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; García-Pinto D; Valverde J
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 28214227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fully Automated Volumetric Breast Density Estimation from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Gastounioti A; Pantalone L; Scott CG; Cohen EA; Wu FF; Winham SJ; Jensen MR; Maidment ADA; Vachon CM; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2021 Dec; 301(3):561-568. PubMed ID: 34519572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories.
    Tagliafico AS; Tagliafico G; Cavagnetto F; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 86(1031):20130255. PubMed ID: 24029631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Gastounioti A; Kasi CD; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Wu FF; Norman AD; Conant EF; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Kontos D; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32396041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?
    Nakashima K; Uematsu T; Itoh T; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Hayashi T; Sugino T
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):570-577. PubMed ID: 27236817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Fusco R; Raiano N; Raiano C; Maio F; Vallone P; Mattace Raso M; Setola SV; Granata V; Rubulotta MR; Barretta ML; Petrosino T; Petrillo A
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108912. PubMed ID: 32151787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison Between Digital and Synthetic 2D Mammograms in Breast Density Interpretation.
    Alshafeiy TI; Wadih A; Nicholson BT; Rochman CM; Peppard HR; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):W36-W41. PubMed ID: 28504593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
    Caumo F; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Romanucci G; Rella R; Cugola L; Bricolo P; Fedato C; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
    Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 29237146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Choi Y; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Choi GY
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():12-17. PubMed ID: 30703693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
    Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.
    Gilbert FJ; Tucker L; Gillan MG; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Lim YY; Purushothaman H; Strudley C; Astley SM; Morrish O; Young KC; Duffy SW
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(4):i-xxv, 1-136. PubMed ID: 25599513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density.
    Shin SU; Chang JM; Bae MS; Lee SH; Cho N; Seo M; Kim WH; Moon WK
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25182628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
    Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.