BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37907648)

  • 1. Technical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal tumors: a single-center safety and feasibility study.
    Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Takahashi T; Hayashi H; Higashi T; Fukada M; Asai R; Sato Y; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Matsuhashi N
    Surg Today; 2024 May; 54(5):478-486. PubMed ID: 37907648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes.
    Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven NAW; Hompes R; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Sietses C
    Br J Surg; 2021 Nov; 108(11):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 34370834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].
    Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang X; Cao G; Mao W; Lao W; He C
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2020 Sep; 16(5):979-989. PubMed ID: 33004738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis in Experienced Centers.
    Burghgraef TA; Crolla RMPH; Verheijen PM; Fahim M; van Geloven A; Leijtens JWA; Pronk A; Smits AB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Feb; 65(2):218-227. PubMed ID: 34459449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy.
    Park SY; Choi GS; Park JS; Kim HJ; Ryuk JP
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Jan; 27(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 22752275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer.
    Park JS; Choi GS; Lim KH; Jang YS; Jun SH
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Jan; 25(1):240-8. PubMed ID: 20552367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis.
    Matsuhashi N; Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Endo M; Sato Y; Kuno M; Hayashi H; Asai R; Fukada M; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Takahashi T
    BMC Surg; 2023 Oct; 23(1):332. PubMed ID: 37898761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Yamanashi T; Miura H; Tanaka T; Watanabe A; Yokoi K; Kojo K; Niihara M; Yamashita K; Sato T; Kumamoto Y; Hiki N; Naitoh T
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Jun; 17(3):959-969. PubMed ID: 36413257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
    Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Feng Q; Yuan W; Li T; Tang B; Jia B; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Zhao R; Zhang C; Cheng L; Zhang X; Liang F; He G; Wei Y; Xu J;
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):991-1004. PubMed ID: 36087608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparative Analysis of Short-term Patient Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Rectal Surgery.
    Crain N; Ho NJ; Aboulian A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Oct; 65(10):1274-1278. PubMed ID: 34907989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients: ACS-NSQIP analysis.
    Albayati S; Hitos K; Berney CR; Morgan MJ; Pathma-Nathan N; El-Khoury T; Richardson A; Chu DI; Cannon J; Kennedy G; Toh JWT
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):637-643. PubMed ID: 36269488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy in patients with chronic kidney disease: A propensity score-matched comparative analysis of surgical outcomes.
    Takagi T; Kondo T; Tachibana H; Iizuka J; Omae K; Kobayashi H; Yoshida K; Tanabe K
    Int J Urol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):505-510. PubMed ID: 28503809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Security and Radical Assessment in Open, Laparoscopic, Robotic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study.
    Yang SX; Sun ZQ; Zhou QB; Xu JZ; Chang Y; Xia KK; Wang GX; Li Z; Song JM; Zhang ZY; Yuan WT; Liu JB
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818794160. PubMed ID: 30198395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters following mini-laparotomy vs. laparoscopic/robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study.
    Chill HH; Hadizadeh A; Paya-Ten C; Leffelman A; Chang C; Moss NP; Goldberg RP
    BMC Womens Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):173. PubMed ID: 38481283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining staged laparoscopic colectomy with robotic completion proctectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in ulcerative colitis for improved clinical and cosmetic outcomes: a single-center feasibility study and technical description.
    Birrer DL; Frehner M; Kitow J; Zoetzl KM; Rickenbacher A; Biedermann L; Turina M
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Jun; 17(3):877-884. PubMed ID: 36324050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No beneficial effect on survival but a decrease in postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer undergoing robotic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
    Lei X; Yang L; Huang Z; Shi H; Zhou Z; Tang C; Li T
    BMC Surg; 2021 Sep; 21(1):355. PubMed ID: 34583670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.