These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37908812)

  • 1. Measuring people's covariational reasoning in Bayesian situations.
    Steib N; Krauss S; Binder K; Büchter T; Böcherer-Linder K; Eichler A; Vogel M
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1184370. PubMed ID: 37908812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different Visualizations Cause Different Strategies When Dealing With Bayesian Situations.
    Eichler A; Böcherer-Linder K; Vogel M
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1897. PubMed ID: 32973606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving Diagnostic Efficiency with Frequency Double-Trees and Frequency Nets in Bayesian Reasoning.
    Kunzelmann AK; Binder K; Fischer MR; Reincke M; Braun LT; Schmidmaier R
    MDM Policy Pract; 2022; 7(1):23814683221086623. PubMed ID: 35321028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Covariational reasoning and item context affect language in undergraduate mass balance written explanations.
    Shiroda M; Doherty JH; Scott EE; Haudek KC
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Dec; 47(4):762-775. PubMed ID: 37615044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How general is the natural frequency effect? The case of joint probabilities.
    Stegmüller N; Binder K; Krauss S
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1296359. PubMed ID: 38659687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of visualizing statistical information - an empirical study on tree diagrams and 2 × 2 tables.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Bruckmaier G
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1186. PubMed ID: 26379569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A New Visualization for Probabilistic Situations Containing Two Binary Events: The Frequency Net.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Wiesner P
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():750. PubMed ID: 32528335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Impact of Visualizing Nested Sets. An Empirical Study on Tree Diagrams and Unit Squares.
    Böcherer-Linder K; Eichler A
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():2026. PubMed ID: 28123371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Use of Visualizations to Improve Bayesian Reasoning: A Literature Review.
    Cui L; Lo S; Liu Z
    Vision (Basel); 2023 Mar; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 36977297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Natural frequency trees improve diagnostic efficiency in Bayesian reasoning.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Schmidmaier R; Braun LT
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2021 Aug; 26(3):847-863. PubMed ID: 33599875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Within-subject consistency and between-subject variability in Bayesian reasoning strategies.
    Cohen AL; Staub A
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Sep; 81():26-47. PubMed ID: 26354671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Eye-Tracking Study of Statistical Reasoning With Tree Diagrams and 2 × 2 Tables.
    Bruckmaier G; Binder K; Krauss S; Kufner HM
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():632. PubMed ID: 31156488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Judgment dissociation theory: an analysis of differences in causal, counterfactual, and covariational reasoning.
    Mandel DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Sep; 132(3):419-34. PubMed ID: 13678376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness.
    Weber P; Binder K; Krauss S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1833. PubMed ID: 30369891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidencing How Experience and Problem Format Affect Probabilistic Reasoning Through Interaction Analysis.
    Reani M; Davies A; Peek N; Jay C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1548. PubMed ID: 31333551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a review of what improves Bayesian reasoning and why.
    Brase GL; Hill WT
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():340. PubMed ID: 25873904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers: The problem-wording effect on Bayesian reasoning.
    Sirota M; Navarrete G; Juanchich M
    Cognition; 2024 Apr; 245():105722. PubMed ID: 38309041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effects of Working Memory and Probability Format on Bayesian Reasoning.
    Yin L; Shi Z; Liao Z; Tang T; Xie Y; Peng S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():863. PubMed ID: 32477216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Natural Frequencies Improve Public Understanding of Medical Test Results: An Experimental Study on Various Bayesian Inference Tasks with Multiple Scoring Methods and Non-Bayesian Reasoning Strategies.
    Kim S
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Sep; ():272989X241275191. PubMed ID: 39291336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visualizing the Bayesian 2-test case: The effect of tree diagrams on medical decision making.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Bruckmaier G; Marienhagen J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0195029. PubMed ID: 29584770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.