BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37908910)

  • 1. Can Artificial Intelligence Beat Humans in Detecting Breast Malignancy on Mammograms?
    Malik M; Yasmin S; Kumar A; Hassan Y; Rizvi Y; Iffat
    Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e46208. PubMed ID: 37908910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology.
    Brem RF; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Hoffmeister JW; Desimio MP
    Cancer; 2005 Sep; 104(5):931-5. PubMed ID: 16047331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system.
    Malich A; Sauner D; Marx C; Facius M; Boehm T; Pfleiderer SO; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
    Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):851-6. PubMed ID: 12869683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-assisted detection as a second reader in symptomatic Asian women with palpable breast cancer.
    Chu WC; Lam WW; Pang AL; So NM; Tang AP; Tse GM; Ahuja AT
    Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 15191097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence System for Detection of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma on Digital Mammography.
    Arce S; Vijay A; Yim E; Spiguel LR; Hanna M
    Cureus; 2023 May; 15(5):e38770. PubMed ID: 37303390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CAD May Not be Necessary for Microcalcifications in the Digital era, CAD May Benefit Radiologists for Masses.
    Destounis SV; Arieno AL; Morgan RC
    J Clin Imaging Sci; 2012; 2():45. PubMed ID: 22919559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
    Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.
    Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Mohtashemi K; Jindal G; Disimio MP; Rogers SK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ductal carcinoma in situ: computer-aided detection in screening mammography.
    Pai VR; Gregory NE; Swinford AE; Rebner M
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 17053200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast Cancer: Computer-aided Detection with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Morra L; Sacchetto D; Durando M; Agliozzo S; Carbonaro LA; Delsanto S; Pesce B; Persano D; Mariscotti G; Marra V; Fonio P; Bert A
    Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25961633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AI analytics can be used as imaging biomarkers for predicting invasive upgrade of ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Yoon J; Yang J; Lee HS; Kim MJ; Park VY; Rho M; Yoon JH
    Insights Imaging; 2024 Apr; 15(1):100. PubMed ID: 38578585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
    Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system.
    Malich A; Marx C; Facius M; Boehm T; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(12):2454-9. PubMed ID: 11734939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection.
    Malich A; Schmidt S; Fischer DR; Facius M; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 18337045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM
    Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
    Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms.
    Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson SK; Adler D; Nees AV; Shen J
    Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 16801362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of breast density on computer aided detection.
    Malich A; Fischer DR; Facius M; Petrovitch A; Boettcher J; Marx C; Hansch A; Kaiser WA
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Sep; 18(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 15827823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.