These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 379095)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement for restoration of cervical erosion.
    Charbeneau GT; Bozell RR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Jun; 98(6):936-9. PubMed ID: 379095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-year evaluation of effect of surface conditioning on bonding of glass ionomer cement in cervical abrasion lesions.
    van Dijken J
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Apr; 100(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 1574680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The clinical development of the glass-ionomer cement. III. The erosion lesion.
    McLean JW; Wilson AD
    Aust Dent J; 1977 Jun; 22(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 337956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restoration of cervical contours on nonprepared teeth using glass ionomer cement: a 4 1/2-year report.
    Brandau HE; Ziemiecki TL; Charbeneau GT
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 108(5):782-3. PubMed ID: 6376589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of glass ionomer cement in deciduous teeth. Follow-up survey.
    Vlietstra JR; Plant CG; Shovelton DS; Bradnock G
    Br Dent J; 1978 Sep; 145(6):164-6. PubMed ID: 359002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Restorations of eroded areas.
    Mount GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jan; 120(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 2404041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Barbosa AN; Roulet JF
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Glass ionomer cement restorations: the effects of lasing the cavity walls on marginal microleakage.
    Liberman R; Eli I; Imber S; Shlezinger I
    Clin Prev Dent; 1990; 12(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 2376107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in cut non-retentive preparations and pre-existing cervical erosion/abrasion lesions.
    Kaplan I; Harris EF; Mincer HH; Gilpatrick RO
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1993 Apr; 73(2):24-8. PubMed ID: 8309244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A bioactive dental luting cement--its retentive properties and 3-year clinical findings.
    Jefferies SR; Pameijer CH; Appleby DC; Boston D; Lööf J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Feb; 34 Spec No 1():2-9. PubMed ID: 23577551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
    Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.