These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37909868)
1. Current and emerging technologies for the remediation of difficult-to-measure radionuclides at nuclear sites. Hemming SD; Purkis JM; Warwick PE; Cundy AB Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2023 Dec; 25(12):1909-1925. PubMed ID: 37909868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An overview of permeable reactive barriers for in situ sustainable groundwater remediation. Obiri-Nyarko F; Grajales-Mesa SJ; Malina G Chemosphere; 2014 Sep; 111():243-59. PubMed ID: 24997925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of field-scale permeable reactive barriers: An overview on potentials and possible implications for in-situ groundwater remediation applications. Singh R; Chakma S; Birke V Sci Total Environ; 2023 Feb; 858(Pt 1):158838. PubMed ID: 36122715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of zeolites in permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) for in-situ groundwater remediation: A critical review. Zhang Y; Cao B; Yin H; Meng L; Jin W; Wang F; Xu J; Al-Tabbaa A Chemosphere; 2022 Dec; 308(Pt 1):136290. PubMed ID: 36058373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technetium and iodine aqueous species immobilization and transformations in the presence of strong reductants and calcite-forming solutions: Remedial action implications. Lawter AR; Garcia WL; Kukkadapu RK; Qafoku O; Bowden ME; Saslow SA; Qafoku NP Sci Total Environ; 2018 Sep; 636():588-595. PubMed ID: 29723831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comprehensive review on permeable reactive barrier for the remediation of groundwater contamination. Budania R; Dangayach S J Environ Manage; 2023 Apr; 332():117343. PubMed ID: 36758361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pump-and-treat (P&T) vs groundwater circulation wells (GCW): Which approach delivers more sustainable and effective groundwater remediation? Ciampi P; Esposito C; Bartsch E; Alesi EJ; Petrangeli Papini M Environ Res; 2023 Oct; 234():116538. PubMed ID: 37399987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An overview of in-situ remediation for nitrate in groundwater. Zhao B; Sun Z; Liu Y Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 804():149981. PubMed ID: 34517309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An overview of in situ remediation for groundwater co-contaminated with heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons. Yuan L; Wang K; Zhao Q; Yang L; Wang G; Jiang M; Li L J Environ Manage; 2024 Jan; 349():119342. PubMed ID: 37890298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phytoremediation of radioactive elements, possibilities and challenges: special focus on agricultural aspects. Singh G; Bhadange S; Bhawna F; Shewale P; Dahiya R; Aggarwal A; Manju F; Arya SK Int J Phytoremediation; 2023; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 35244498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Removal capacity and chemical speciation of groundwater iodide (I Li D; Kaplan DI; Sams A; Powell BA; Knox AS J Environ Radioact; 2018 Dec; 192():505-512. PubMed ID: 30114621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calcium carbonate-based permeable reactive barriers for iron and manganese groundwater remediation at landfills. Wang Y; Pleasant S; Jain P; Powell J; Townsend T Waste Manag; 2016 Jul; 53():128-35. PubMed ID: 26992666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental Electrokinetics for a sustainable subsurface. Lima AT; Hofmann A; Reynolds D; Ptacek CJ; Van Cappellen P; Ottosen LM; Pamukcu S; Alshawabekh A; O'Carroll DM; Riis C; Cox E; Gent DB; Landis R; Wang J; Chowdhury AIA; Secord EL; Sanchez-Hachair A Chemosphere; 2017 Aug; 181():122-133. PubMed ID: 28433930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Developing field-scale, gentle remediation options for nuclear sites contaminated with Purkis JM; Bardos RP; Graham J; Cundy AB J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 308():114620. PubMed ID: 35149404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dioxin- and POP-contaminated sites--contemporary and future relevance and challenges: overview on background, aims and scope of the series. Weber R; Gaus C; Tysklind M; Johnston P; Forter M; Hollert H; Heinisch E; Holoubek I; Lloyd-Smith M; Masunaga S; Moccarelli P; Santillo D; Seike N; Symons R; Torres JP; Verta M; Varbelow G; Vijgen J; Watson A; Costner P; Woelz J; Wycisk P; Zennegg M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Jul; 15(5):363-93. PubMed ID: 18597132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radioiodine sorption/desorption and speciation transformation by subsurface sediments from the Hanford Site. Xu C; Kaplan DI; Zhang S; Athon M; Ho YF; Li HP; Yeager CM; Schwehr KA; Grandbois R; Wellman D; Santschi PH J Environ Radioact; 2015 Jan; 139():43-55. PubMed ID: 25464040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current status of soil and groundwater remediation technologies in Taiwan. Yeh TY Int J Phytoremediation; 2021; 23(2):212-218. PubMed ID: 33508957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The multi-process reaction model and underlying mechanisms of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol removal in lab-scale biochar-microorganism augmented ZVI PRBs and field-scale PRBs performance. Wang W; Gong T; Li H; Liu Y; Dong Q; Zan R; Wu Y Water Res; 2022 Jun; 217():118422. PubMed ID: 35413559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sequential coupling of bio-augmented permeable reactive barriers for remediation of 1,1,1-trichloroethane contaminated groundwater. Wang W; Wu Y Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(12):12042-12054. PubMed ID: 30827025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards the application of electrokinetic remediation for nuclear site decommissioning. Purkis JM; Warwick PE; Graham J; Hemming SD; Cundy AB J Hazard Mater; 2021 Jul; 413():125274. PubMed ID: 33609867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]