191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37910242)
1. Mechanical and chemical characterization of contemporary occlusal splint materials fabricated with different methods: a systematic review.
Benli M; Al-Haj Husain N; Ozcan M
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7115-7141. PubMed ID: 37910242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of flexible three-dimensionally printed occlusal splint materials: An in vitro study.
Perea-Lowery L; Gibreel M; Garoushi S; Vallittu P; Lassila L
Dent Mater; 2023 Oct; 39(10):957-963. PubMed ID: 37666693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of occlusal splint materials: CAD-CAM versus conventional resins.
Gibreel M; Perea-Lowery L; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Dec; 124():104813. PubMed ID: 34530298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and degree of conversion of 3D printed splint material.
Perea-Lowery L; Gibreel M; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104254. PubMed ID: 33333480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wear Behavior of Occlusal Splint Materials Manufactured By Various Methods: A Systematic Review.
Grymak A; Aarts JM; Ma S; Waddell JN; Choi JJE
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):472-487. PubMed ID: 34516696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wear resistance and flexural properties of low force SLA- and DLP-printed splint materials in different printing orientations: An in vitro study.
Simeon P; Unkovskiy A; Saadat Sarmadi B; Nicic R; Koch PJ; Beuer F; Schmidt F
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr; 152():106458. PubMed ID: 38364445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-body wear and surface hardness of occlusal splint materials.
Gibreel M; Perea-Lowery L; Vallittu PK; Garoushi S; Lassila L
Dent Mater J; 2022 Nov; 41(6):916-922. PubMed ID: 36288940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical and biological properties of polymer materials for oral appliances produced with additive 3D printing and subtractive CAD-CAM techniques compared to conventional methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Valenti C; Federici MI; Coniglio M; Betti P; Pancrazi GP; Tulli O; Masciotti F; Nanussi A; Pagano S
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jun; 28(7):396. PubMed ID: 38916682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Analysis between Conventional Acrylic, CAD/CAM Milled, and 3D CAD/CAM Printed Occlusal Splints.
Abad-Coronel C; Ruano Espinosa C; Ordóñez Palacios S; Paltán CA; Fajardo JI
Materials (Basel); 2023 Sep; 16(18):. PubMed ID: 37763547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical and physical properties of splint materials for oral appliances produced by additive, subtractive and conventional manufacturing.
Maleki T; Meinen J; Coldea A; Reymus M; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38851965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of three-dimensional printing polycarbonate for occlusal splints].
Lin R; Yu CH; Sun J
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2019 Oct; 28(5):467-471. PubMed ID: 32274475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance and 2-body wear of 3-dimensional-printed occlusal devices.
Lutz AM; Hampe R; Roos M; Lümkemann N; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):166-172. PubMed ID: 30647000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical performance of 3-dimensionally printed resins compared with conventional and milled resins for the manufacture of occlusal devices: A systematic review.
de Paula Lopez V; Dias Corpa Tardelli J; Botelho AL; Marcondes Agnelli JA; Cândido Dos Reis A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36631367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of wear between occlusal splint materials and resin composite materials.
Reyes-Sevilla M; Kuijs RH; Werner A; Kleverlaan CJ; Lobbezoo F
J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Jul; 45(7):539-544. PubMed ID: 29663496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thermo-flexible resin for the 3D printing of occlusal splints: A randomized pilot trial.
Herpel C; Kykal J; Rues S; Schwindling FS; Rammelsberg P; Eberhard L
J Dent; 2023 Jun; 133():104514. PubMed ID: 37031885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of 3D printing system and post-curing atmosphere on micro- and nano-wear of additive-manufactured occlusal splint materials.
Wada J; Wada K; Garoushi S; Shinya A; Wakabayashi N; Iwamoto T; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jun; 142():105799. PubMed ID: 37028121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Nitrogen Gas Post-Curing and Printer Type on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Hard Occlusal Splint Material.
Wada J; Wada K; Gibreel M; Wakabayashi N; Iwamoto T; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
Polymers (Basel); 2022 Sep; 14(19):. PubMed ID: 36235919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of 3D Printer Type and Use of Protection Gas during Post-Curing on Some Physical Properties of Soft Occlusal Splint Material.
Wada J; Wada K; Gibreel M; Wakabayashi N; Iwamoto T; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
Polymers (Basel); 2022 Oct; 14(21):. PubMed ID: 36365611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elution behavior of a 3D-printed, milled and conventional resin-based occlusal splint material.
Wedekind L; Güth JF; Schweiger J; Kollmuss M; Reichl FX; Edelhoff D; Högg C
Dent Mater; 2021 Apr; 37(4):701-710. PubMed ID: 33648744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
