141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37910827)
1. Comparison of Treatment Time for Single-Implant Crowns Between Digital and Conventional Workflows for Posterior Implant Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Jarangkul W; Kunavisarut C; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Joda T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Apr; 39(2):286-293. PubMed ID: 37910827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) comparing digital and conventional workflows for treatment with posterior single-unit implant restorations: A randomized controlled trial.
Kunavisarut C; Jarangkul W; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Joda T
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103875. PubMed ID: 34728252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time-Efficiency Analysis Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows for Implant Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Crossover Trial.
Joda T; Brägger U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1047-53. PubMed ID: 26394340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical quality and efficiency of monolithic glass ceramic crowns in the posterior area: digital compared with conventional workflows.
Mühlemann S; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Sailer I
Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(3):215-223. PubMed ID: 30264050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures.
Sailer I; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Mühlemann S
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 28024819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial.
Joda T; Brägger U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1401-1406. PubMed ID: 27796072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.
Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review.
Joda T; Zarone F; Ferrari M
BMC Oral Health; 2017 Sep; 17(1):124. PubMed ID: 28927393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Crown Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations in a Complete Digital Workflow: A Randomized Control Trial.
Ren S; Jiang X; Lin Y; Di P
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):405-411. PubMed ID: 34748653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time-efficiency and cost-analysis comparing three digital workflows for treatment with monolithic zirconia implant fixed dental prostheses: A double-blinded RCT.
Joda T; Gintaute A; Brägger U; Ferrari M; Weber K; Zitzmann NU
J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103779. PubMed ID: 34391875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A pilot clinical study of immediate provisionalization with a chairside computer aided design and computer aided manufacture monolithic crown for single tooth immediate implant placement].
Tian JH; Di P; Lin Y; Zhang Y; Wei DH; Cui HY
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 52(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 28072987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part I: Time efficiency of complete-arch digital scans versus conventional impressions.
Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Benic GI
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 30017152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A double-blind randomized within-subject study to evaluate clinical applicability of four digital workflows for the fabrication of posterior single implant crown.
Guo D; Mühlemann S; Pan S; Zhou Y; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1319-1329. PubMed ID: 37638493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monolithic implant-supported lithium disilicate (LS2) crowns in a complete digital workflow: A prospective clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up.
Joda T; Ferrari M; Brägger U
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 19(3):505-511. PubMed ID: 28093860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic implant-supported single crowns made from lithium disilicate: Final results of a 5-year prospective cohort study.
Spies BC; Pieralli S; Vach K; Kohal RJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 19(5):876-883. PubMed ID: 28608435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Micro-CT evaluation of marginal and internal fit of cemented polymer infiltrated ceramic network material crowns manufactured after conventional and digital impressions.
Dauti R; Cvikl B; Lilaj B; Heimel P; Moritz A; Schedle A
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 29891419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns.
Joda T; Brägger U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1304-1306. PubMed ID: 25040237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of functional and esthetic outcomes in digital versus analog rehabilitation of one-piece screw-retained implant crowns placed at second stage surgery.
Edinger D; Henningsen A; Bibiza E; Smeets R; Joda T
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):793-800. PubMed ID: 37194739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized clinical trial comparing the clinical fit and chairside adjustment time for implant-supported crowns fabricated by fully digital and partially digital techniques.
Haghi HR; Ghanbarzadeh J; Kiamanesh E
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):865-870. PubMed ID: 35525625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time efficiency and quality of outcomes in a model-free digital workflow using digital impression immediately after implant placement: A double-blind self-controlled clinical trial.
Pan S; Guo D; Zhou Y; Jung RE; Hämmerle CHF; Mühlemann S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jul; 30(7):617-626. PubMed ID: 31021451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
