These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37910827)

  • 41. Digital versus Analog Procedures for the Prosthetic Restoration of Single Implants: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 1 Year of Follow-Up.
    Mangano F; Veronesi G
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():5325032. PubMed ID: 30112398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical evaluation and quantitative occlusal change analysis of posterior implant-supported all-ceramic crowns: A 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Zhang Y; Wei D; Tian J; Zhao Y; Lin Y; Di P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1188-1197. PubMed ID: 37526213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions.
    Taha D; Sabet A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):93.e1-93.e9. PubMed ID: 33933269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Microstructural and Mechanical Characterization of CAD/CAM Materials for Monolithic Dental Restorations.
    Furtado de Mendonca A; Shahmoradi M; Gouvêa CVD; De Souza GM; Ellakwa A
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e587-e594. PubMed ID: 30121945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Özcan M
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):37. PubMed ID: 33478459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis.
    Joda T; Brägger U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1430-5. PubMed ID: 25179680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Ultra-thin occlusal veneers bonded to enamel and made of ceramic or hybrid materials exhibit load-bearing capacities not different from conventional restorations.
    Ioannidis A; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Benic GI
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb; 90():433-440. PubMed ID: 30447557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Single Implant-Supported Zirconia Crowns Following a Digital and Conventional Workflow: Four-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Beck F; Zupancic Cepic L; Lettner S; Moritz A; Ulm C; Zechner W; Schedle A
    J Clin Med; 2024 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 38256565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
    Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Precision of digital implant models compared to conventional implant models for posterior single implant crowns: A within-subject comparison.
    Mühlemann S; Greter EA; Park JM; Hämmerle CHF; Thoma DS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):931-936. PubMed ID: 30168207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accuracy and Efficiency of Digitally Fabricated All-Ceramic Crowns from Conventional Impressions and Intraoral Scans: A Single-Blind Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Liu X; Feng K; Dong L; Liu L; Ni L; Zheng D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 36484666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical Fitting and Adjustment Time for Implant-Supported Crowns Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows.
    Joda T; Katsoulis J; Brägger U
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 18(5):946-954. PubMed ID: 26395013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Model-free digital workflow and immediate functional loading of implant-supported monolithic glass-ceramic crowns: A case series.
    Pletkus J; Rutkūnas V; Gendvilienė I; Borusevičius R; Gedrimienė A; Auškalnis A; Kubilius M; Kaktys J
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104270. PubMed ID: 36002118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) of posterior single-implant crowns using digital workflows: A randomized controlled trial with a three-year follow-up.
    Joda T; Ferrari M; Bragger U; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):954-961. PubMed ID: 30144159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Marginal Fit Evaluation of CAD/CAM All Ceramic Crowns Obtained by Two Digital Workflows: An In Vitro Study Using Micro-CT Technology.
    Duqum IS; Brenes C; Mendonca G; Carneiro TAPN; Cooper LF
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1037-1043. PubMed ID: 31621973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Marginal Accuracy of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia Crowns Fabricated by Conventional and Digital Workflows.
    Abduo J; Ho G; Centorame A; Chohan S; Park C; Abdouni R; Le P; Ngo C
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):706-713. PubMed ID: 36321644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accuracy of marginal fit and axial wall contour for lithium disilicate crowns fabricated using three digital workflows.
    Sadid-Zadeh R; Katsavochristou A; Squires T; Simon M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):121-127. PubMed ID: 31027956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments.
    Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Scheller H; Weibrich G; Lehmann KM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 27004277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.