These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37910832)

  • 1. Optical Accuracy Assessment of Robotically Assisted Dental Implant Surgery for Partially Edentulous Patients: A Single-Arm Clinical Trial.
    Klass D; Price A; DiBattista M; Dibart S; Kernitsky J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Aug; 39(4):625-631. PubMed ID: 37910832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
    Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study.
    Wang W; Xu H; Mei D; Zhou C; Li X; Han Z; Zhou X; Li X; Zhao B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 37728030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of haptic robotic guidance of dental implant surgery for completely edentulous arches.
    Bolding SL; Reebye UN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 33678441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
    Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
    Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy analysis of robotic-assisted immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series.
    Zhao N; Du L; Lv C; Liang J; He L; Zhou Q
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105035. PubMed ID: 38734299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
    Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A retrospective case series study.
    Li P; Chen J; Li A; Luo K; Xu S; Yang S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 37855331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of dental implant placement with a robotic system in partially edentulous patients: A prospective, single-arm clinical trial.
    Chen W; Al-Taezi KA; Chu CH; Shen Y; Wu J; Cai K; Chen P; Tang C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jul; 34(7):707-718. PubMed ID: 37167364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients.
    Younes F; Cosyn J; De Bruyckere T; Cleymaet R; Bouckaert E; Eghbali A
    J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Jun; 45(6):721-732. PubMed ID: 29608793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study.
    Shusterman A; Nashef R; Tecco S; Mangano C; Lerner H; Mangano FG
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105052. PubMed ID: 38734298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
    Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the number and distribution of fiducial markers on the accuracy of robot-guided implant surgery in edentulous mandibular arches: An in vitro study.
    Zhao Y; Liao Y; Wu X; Zhang Y; Shi B; Yan Q
    J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104529. PubMed ID: 37105431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of flapless surgery using an autonomous robotic system in full-arch immediate implant restoration: A case series.
    Shu Q; Chen D; Wang X; Liu Q; Ge Y; Su Y
    J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():105017. PubMed ID: 38657725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Marchetti M; Scarfò B; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 25237668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and Precision of Haptic Robotic-Guided Implant Surgery in a Large Consecutive Series.
    Neugarten JM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Feb; 39(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 37939239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography-derived laboratory-based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients.
    Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Knierim K; Behneke N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 21443593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect on the performance of a dynamic navigation system of superimposing a standard tessellation language (STL) file obtained with an intraoral scan on a cone beam computer tomograph (CBCT). An experimental in vitro study.
    Jorba-García A; Ruiz-Romero V; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Sánchez-Garcés MÁ; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105150. PubMed ID: 38909646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.