These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37914607)

  • 61. Refining hollow obturator base using light-activated resin.
    Wang RR; Hirsch RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):327-9. PubMed ID: 9297653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A workflow for fabricating a hollow obturator by using 3D digital technologies.
    Koyama S; Kato H; Harata T; Sasaki K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):648-652. PubMed ID: 31590982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Masticatory performance and oral health-related quality of life in edentulous maxillectomy patients: A cross-sectional study to compare implant-supported obturators and conventional obturators.
    Buurman DJM; Speksnijder CM; Engelen BHBT; Kessler P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 May; 31(5):405-416. PubMed ID: 31944417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Comparative analysis of intaglio surface trueness of cement-retained implant-supported prostheses generated by a cast-free digital workflow and a three-dimensionally printed cast workflow.
    Hwang JY; Yoon HI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):272.e1-272.e7. PubMed ID: 36180262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparison of obturator prosthesis fabricated using different techniques and its effect on the management of a hemipalatomaxillectomy patient.
    Badadare MM; Patil SB; Bhat S; Tambe A
    BMJ Case Rep; 2014 Aug; 2014():. PubMed ID: 25188927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A comparison of the shear bond strength between denture teeth and denture base resins manufactured either conventionally or with a 3D printer.
    Aydin N; Uslu Kavrama F; Yosuncigir H; Ucar Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):742.e1-742.e6. PubMed ID: 37743140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part I - Conventional versus CAD-CAM methods: A clinical controlled crossover study.
    Maniewicz S; Imamura Y; El Osta N; Srinivasan M; Müller F; Chebib N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):611-617. PubMed ID: 36116950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Retrospective Comparison of Postinsertion Maintenances Between Conventional and 3D Printed Complete Dentures Fabricated in a Predoctoral Clinic.
    Kim TH; Huh JB; Lee J; Bae EB; Park CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2021 May; 30(S2):158-162. PubMed ID: 33434330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Maxillary defects due to COVID-19 associated mucormycosis: Impact on quality of life after rehabilitation with an obturator.
    Chouksey G; Gupta V; Goel P; Purohit A; Dev A; Kumar B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37633728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Fabrication of the hollow bulb obturator.
    Palmer B; Coffey KW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Apr; 53(4):595-6. PubMed ID: 3858525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Inflatable hollow obturator prostheses for patients undergoing an extensive maxillectomy: a case report.
    Hou YZ; Huang Z; Ye HQ; Zhou YS
    Int J Oral Sci; 2012 Jun; 4(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 22653550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Sealing maxillary titanium obturators with removable flexible caps.
    Reitemeier B; Schaal W; Wolf A; Walter M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):381-3. PubMed ID: 26581659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Gaining retention, support and stability of a maxillary obturator.
    Raja HZ; Saleem MN
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 May; 21(5):311-4. PubMed ID: 21575545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Modified bypass in maxillary hollow-bulb obturators.
    Zaki HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Mar; 43(3):320-1. PubMed ID: 6928199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Comparison of weight reduction in different designs of solid and hollow obturator prostheses.
    Ramsey WO
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 May; 63(5):602. PubMed ID: 2187086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The hollow bulb obturator: its fabrication using one denture flask.
    Elliott DJ
    Quintessence Dent Technol; 1983 Jan; 7(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 6572012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Stress distribution & deflection in an Aramany class II obturator fabricated with cobalt-chromium & titanium alloys - 3D FEA.
    Shah TD; Naveen YG; Kattimani P; Kamath G; Shah K; Raza A
    Saudi Dent J; 2019 Apr; 31(2):251-257. PubMed ID: 30983836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Effect of resilient lining of obturator bulbs on patients with maxillectomies.
    Ikusika OF; Dosumu OO; Ajayi DM; Ogunrinde TJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):932-936.e1. PubMed ID: 27422234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. PEEK Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis Fabrication Using Intraoral Scanning, 3D Printing, and CAD/CAM.
    Tasopoulos T; Chatziemmanouil D; Kouveliotis G; Karaiskou G; Wang J; Zoidis P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(3):333-340. PubMed ID: 32320188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The hollow box maxillary obturator.
    Blair FM; Hunter NR
    Br Dent J; 1998 May; 184(10):484-7. PubMed ID: 9642863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.