120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37914653)
1. Differences Between Highly Rated vs Poorly Rated Patient Ratings of Radiology Reports.
Parikh PP; McMullen K; Jacobson P; Chan F; Volk M; Tan N
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2024; 53(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 37914653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From jargon to clarity: Improving the readability of foot and ankle radiology reports with an artificial intelligence large language model.
Butler JJ; Harrington MC; Tong Y; Rosenbaum AJ; Samsonov AP; Walls RJ; Kennedy JG
Foot Ankle Surg; 2024 Jun; 30(4):331-337. PubMed ID: 38336501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Readability Levels of Dental Patient Education Brochures.
Boles CD; Liu Y; November-Rider D
J Dent Hyg; 2016 Feb; 90(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 26896514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decoding radiology reports: Potential application of OpenAI ChatGPT to enhance patient understanding of diagnostic reports.
Li H; Moon JT; Iyer D; Balthazar P; Krupinski EA; Bercu ZL; Newsome JM; Banerjee I; Gichoya JW; Trivedi HM
Clin Imaging; 2023 Sep; 101():137-141. PubMed ID: 37336169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Readability of Lumbar Spine MRI Reports: Will Patients Understand?
Yi PH; Golden SK; Harringa JB; Kliewer MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Mar; 212(3):602-606. PubMed ID: 30620671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Readability of radiology reports: implications for patient-centered care.
Martin-Carreras T; Cook TS; Kahn CE
Clin Imaging; 2019; 54():116-120. PubMed ID: 30639521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Readability Analysis of the Package Leaflets for Biological Medicines Available on the Internet Between 2007 and 2013: An Analytical Longitudinal Study.
Piñero-López MÁ; Modamio P; Lastra CF; Mariño EL
J Med Internet Res; 2016 May; 18(5):e100. PubMed ID: 27226241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Readability levels of individualized family service plans.
Pizur-Barnekow K; Patrick T; Rhyner PM; Folk L; Anderson K
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2010 Aug; 30(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 20608861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance.
Hemaya M; Hemaya M; Habeeb A
Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PORTER: a Prototype System for Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporting.
Oh SC; Cook TS; Kahn CE
J Digit Imaging; 2016 Aug; 29(4):450-4. PubMed ID: 26856348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.
AlKhalili R; Shukla PA; Patel RH; Sanghvi S; Hubbi B
Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 25488695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The readability of informed consent forms for research studies conducted in South Africa.
Fischer AE; Venter WDF; Collins S; Carman M; Lalla-Edward ST
S Afr Med J; 2021 Feb; 111(2):180-183. PubMed ID: 33944731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of patient information leaflets provided by a district general hospital by the Flesch and Flesch-Kincaid method.
Williamson JM; Martin AG
Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Dec; 64(13):1824-31. PubMed ID: 21070533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Normal Thyroid by Any Other Name: Linguistic Analysis of Statements Describing a Normal Thyroid Gland from Noncontrast Chest CT Reports.
Short RG; Befera NT; Hoang JK; Tailor TD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Nov; 15(11):1642-1647. PubMed ID: 29801694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.
Roberts H; Zhang D; Dyer GS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):e70. PubMed ID: 27605695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of the readability and visual appearance of online patient resources for fibroadenoma.
Hutchings HA; Remesh A
PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277823. PubMed ID: 36399450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Structured CT reporting of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: impact on completeness of information and interdisciplinary communication for surgical planning.
Malik RF; Hasanain A; Lafaro KJ; He J; Narang AK; Fishman EK; Zaheer A
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Feb; 47(2):704-714. PubMed ID: 34800162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiology reports for incidental thyroid nodules on CT and MRI: high variability across subspecialties.
Grady AT; Sosa JA; Tanpitukpongse TP; Choudhury KR; Gupta RT; Hoang JK
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):397-402. PubMed ID: 25147197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Journal Club: Structured radiology reports are more complete and more effective than unstructured reports.
Marcovici PA; Taylor GA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1265-71. PubMed ID: 25415704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
