122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37914653)
21. Journal Club: Structured radiology reports are more complete and more effective than unstructured reports.
Marcovici PA; Taylor GA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1265-71. PubMed ID: 25415704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Feasibility and acceptability of ChatGPT generated radiology report summaries for cancer patients.
Chung EM; Zhang SC; Nguyen AT; Atkins KM; Sandler HM; Kamrava M
Digit Health; 2023; 9():20552076231221620. PubMed ID: 38130802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluating Completeness of a Radiology Glossary Using Iterative Refinement.
Chan PYW; Kahn CE
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Jun; 32(3):417-419. PubMed ID: 30298435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing the readability and quality of online information on Bell's palsy.
Raja H; Fitzpatrick N
J Laryngol Otol; 2023 Oct; 137(10):1130-1134. PubMed ID: 36524547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Readability assessment of the British Association of Dermatologists' patient information leaflets.
Hunt WTN; Sofela J; Mohd Mustapa MF;
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2022 Apr; 47(4):684-691. PubMed ID: 34854104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Patient and Provider Feedback for Radiology Reports: Implementation of a Quality Improvement Project in a Multi-Institutional Setting.
Bavadian N; Tan N; Pesch AJ; McMullen K; Haman M; Chan F; Volk ML; Jacobson JP; Krishnaraj A
J Am Coll Radiol; 2021 Oct; 18(10):1430-1438. PubMed ID: 34171227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Forensic scientists' conclusions: how readable are they for non-scientist report-users?
Howes LM; Kirkbride KP; Kelty SF; Julian R; Kemp N
Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Sep; 231(1-3):102-12. PubMed ID: 23890623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Readability assessment of patient educational materials for pediatric spinal conditions from top academic orthopedic institutions.
Michel C; Dijanic C; Abdelmalek G; Sudah S; Kerrigan D; Gorgy G; Yalamanchili P
J Child Orthop; 2023 Jun; 17(3):284-290. PubMed ID: 37288046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Information for oral and maxillofacial patients: can it be improved?
Parvez H; Noorani MS; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 57(5):412-418. PubMed ID: 31054792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An analysis of the readability characteristics of oral health information literature available to the public in Tasmania, Australia.
Barnett T; Hoang H; Furlan A
BMC Oral Health; 2016 Mar; 16():35. PubMed ID: 26984514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Readability of American Society of Metabolic Surgery's Patient Information Publications.
Massie PL; Arshad SA; Auyang ED
J Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 293():727-732. PubMed ID: 37862852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Readability of pediatric health materials for preventive dental care.
Hendrickson RL; Huebner CE; Riedy CA
BMC Oral Health; 2006 Nov; 6():14. PubMed ID: 17109743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Readability of Online Hand Surgery Patient Educational Materials: Evaluating the Trend Since 2008.
Zhang D; Earp BE; Kilgallen EE; Blazar P
J Hand Surg Am; 2022 Feb; 47(2):186.e1-186.e8. PubMed ID: 34023192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Investigating the impact of structured reporting on the linguistic standardization of radiology reports through natural language processing over a 10-year period.
Vosshenrich J; Nesic I; Boll DT; Heye T
Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; 33(11):7496-7506. PubMed ID: 37542652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiology Reporting in the Era of Patient-Centered Care: How Can We Improve Readability?
Patil S; Yacoub JH; Geng X; Ascher SM; Filice RW
J Digit Imaging; 2021 Apr; 34(2):367-373. PubMed ID: 33742332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Readability and patient education materials used for low-income populations.
Wilson M
Clin Nurse Spec; 2009; 23(1):33-40; quiz 41-2. PubMed ID: 19098513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.
Joseph P; Silva NA; Nanda A; Gupta G
World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e934-e938. PubMed ID: 32992056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.
Paasche-Orlow MK; Taylor HA; Brancati FL
N Engl J Med; 2003 Feb; 348(8):721-6. PubMed ID: 12594317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
