181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37914892)
1. Prognostic value of
Isaji Y; Tsuyoshi H; Tsujikawa T; Orisaka M; Okazawa H; Yoshida Y
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):18864. PubMed ID: 37914892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic Value of the Sum of Metabolic Tumor Volume of Primary Tumor and Lymph Nodes Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Cervical Cancer.
Hong JH; Min KJ; Lee JK; So KA; Jung US; Kim S; Eo JS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(9):e2992. PubMed ID: 26945420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Value of
Voskuilen CS; Schweitzer D; Jensen JB; Nielsen AM; Joniau S; Muilwijk T; Necchi A; Azizi M; Spiess PE; Briganti A; Bandini M; Goffin K; Bouchelouche K; van Werkhoven E; Shariat SF; Xylinas E; Azawi NH; Ku JH; Foerster B; van Rhijn BWG; Vegt E; Hendricksen K
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 31591037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of tumor histology on detection of pelvic and para-aortic nodal metastasis with
Lin AJ; Wright JD; Dehdashti F; Siegel BA; Markovina S; Schwarz J; Thaker PH; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Grigsby PW
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Nov; 29(9):1351-1354. PubMed ID: 31473660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in restaging patients affected by ovarian carcinoma: a multicentre study.
Caobelli F; Alongi P; Evangelista L; Picchio M; Saladini G; Rensi M; Geatti O; Castello A; Laghai I; Popescu CE; Dolci C; Crivellaro C; Seghezzi S; Kirienko M; De Biasi V; Cocciolillo F; Quartuccio N;
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):404-13. PubMed ID: 26381775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of volume-based metabolic parameters in uterine cervical cancer determined using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
Yoo J; Choi JY; Moon SH; Bae DS; Park SB; Choe YS; Lee KH; Kim BT
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Sep; 22(7):1226-33. PubMed ID: 22810970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic Impact of Pretreatment Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography SUVmax in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.
Cima S; Perrone AM; Castellucci P; Macchia G; Buwenge M; Cammelli S; Cilla S; Ferioli M; Ferrandina G; Galuppi A; Salizzoni E; Rubino D; Fanti S; De Iaco P; Morganti AG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Mar; 28(3):575-580. PubMed ID: 29372911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The prognostic value of FIGO staging defined by combining MRI and [
Raffa S; Lanfranchi F; Satragno C; Giannelli F; Marcenaro M; Coco A; Cena SE; Sofia L; Marini C; Mammoliti S; Levaggi A; Tagliafico AS; Sambuceti G; Barra S; Morbelli S; Belgioia L; Bauckneht M
Curr Probl Cancer; 2023 Dec; 47(6):101007. PubMed ID: 37684197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic importance of lymph node-to-primary tumor standardized uptake value ratio in invasive squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix.
Chung HH; Cheon GJ; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Oct; 44(11):1862-1869. PubMed ID: 28534183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The predictive recurrence value of MTV-s as an 18F-FDG PET/CT index in patients with IIB-IVA cervical cancer.
Deng C; Ding D; Wang M
Postgrad Med; 2021 May; 133(4):436-443. PubMed ID: 33620285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pelvic lymph node F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake as a prognostic biomarker in newly diagnosed patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Kidd EA; Siegel BA; Dehdashti F; Grigsby PW
Cancer; 2010 Mar; 116(6):1469-75. PubMed ID: 20108309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic implication of retrocrural lymph node involvement revealed by (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer.
Im HJ; Yoon HJ; Lee ES; Kim TS; Kim JY; Chung JK; Kim SK; Park SY
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Mar; 35(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 24253568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the prognostic value of F-18 FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters of primary tumors and MRI findings in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Dag Z; Yilmaz B; Dogan AK; Aksan DU; Ozkurt H; Kızılkaya HO; Arslan D
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(2):154-162. PubMed ID: 30594422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting the accuracy of
Kutluturk K; Simsek A; Comak A; Gonultas F; Unal B; Kekilli E
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jan; 22(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 30666022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative pelvic MRI and 2-[
Fasmer KE; Gulati A; Dybvik JA; Wagner-Larsen KS; Lura N; Salvesen Ø; Forsse D; Trovik J; Pijnenborg JMA; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IS
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):221-232. PubMed ID: 35763096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in cervical cancer: relationship to prognosis.
Kidd EA; Siegel BA; Dehdashti F; Rader JS; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Grigsby PW
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 28(12):2108-13. PubMed ID: 20308664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. False negative rate at
Gouy S; Seebacher V; Chargari C; Terroir M; Grimaldi S; Ilenko A; Maulard A; Genestie C; Leary A; Pautier P; Morice P; Deandreis D
BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):135. PubMed ID: 33549033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative
Goense L; Meziani J; van Rossum PSN; Wessels FJ; Lam MGEH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP
Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):2031-2037. PubMed ID: 29218619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of [
Li K; Sun H; Lu Z; Xin J; Zhang L; Guo Y; Guo Q
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():160-166. PubMed ID: 30150039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Which is better for predicting pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer: Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography or a sentinel node biopsy? A retrospective observational study.
Tanaka T; Sasaki S; Tsuchihashi H; Terai Y; Yamamoto K; Yamada T; Ohmichi M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Apr; 97(16):e0410. PubMed ID: 29668599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
