These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37914942)
1. Assessment of Staphylococcus Aureus growth on biocompatible 3D printed materials. Senderovich N; Shah S; Ow TJ; Rand S; Nosanchuk J; Wake N 3D Print Med; 2023 Nov; 9(1):30. PubMed ID: 37914942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Evaluation of the Bacterial Adherence to Casting Materials. Massaglia JE; Lebowitz C; Fitzgerald K; Hickok NJ; Beredjiklian P; Rivlin M Cureus; 2021 Jul; 13(7):e16724. PubMed ID: 34513359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials. Hall DC; Palmer P; Ji HF; Ehrlich GD; Król JE Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():646303. PubMed ID: 34122361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ink-jet 3D printing as a strategy for developing bespoke non-eluting biofilm resistant medical devices. He Y; Luckett J; Begines B; Dubern JF; Hook AL; Prina E; Rose FRAJ; Tuck CJ; Hague RJM; Irvine DJ; Williams P; Alexander MR; Wildman RD Biomaterials; 2022 Feb; 281():121350. PubMed ID: 35033903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of biofilm formation on acrylic resins used to fabricate dental temporary restorations with the use of 3D printing technology. Mazurek-Popczyk J; Nowicki A; Arkusz K; Pałka Ł; Zimoch-Korzycka A; Baldy-Chudzik K BMC Oral Health; 2022 Oct; 22(1):442. PubMed ID: 36229871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Personalized, 3D- printed fracture fixation plates versus commonly used orthopedic implant materials- biomaterials characteristics and bacterial biofilm formation. Mazurek-Popczyk J; Palka L; Arkusz K; Dalewski B; Baldy-Chudzik K Injury; 2022 Mar; 53(3):938-946. PubMed ID: 34949461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Larry Tube: Customized 3D Printed Laryngectomy Tubes Following Total Laryngectomy. Daoud GE; von Windheim N; Alfayez Y; Michaels RE; Nyirjesy S; Chinn SB; Spector ME; VanKoevering KK Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2023 Nov; 132(11):1477-1482. PubMed ID: 36852947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D printing of surgical instruments for long-duration space missions. Wong JY; Pfahnl AC Aviat Space Environ Med; 2014 Jul; 85(7):758-63. PubMed ID: 25022166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of layer thickness and printing orientation on the color stability and stainability of a 3D-printed resin material. Lee EH; Ahn JS; Lim YJ; Kwon HB; Kim MJ J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):784.e1-784.e7. PubMed ID: 35221037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface properties and initial bacterial biofilm growth on 3D-printed oral appliances: a comparative in vitro study. Wuersching SN; Westphal D; Stawarczyk B; Edelhoff D; Kollmuss M Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2667-2677. PubMed ID: 36576565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by Candida albicans on 3D-printed denture base resins. Silva MDDD; Nunes TSBS; Viotto HEDC; Coelho SRG; Souza RF; Pero AC PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292430. PubMed ID: 37792886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Tahayeri A; Morgan M; Fugolin AP; Bompolaki D; Athirasala A; Pfeifer CS; Ferracane JL; Bertassoni LE Dent Mater; 2018 Feb; 34(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 29110921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting flexural strength of 3D-printed resins: A systematic review. Gad MM; Fouda SM J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(S1):96-110. PubMed ID: 36629333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optical behavior of 3D-printed dental restorative resins: Influence of thickness and printing angle. Espinar C; Della Bona A; Tejada-Casado M; Pulgar R; Pérez MM Dent Mater; 2023 Oct; 39(10):894-902. PubMed ID: 37598040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advancing Surgical Arrhythmia Ablation: Novel Insights on 3D Printing Applications and Two Biocompatible Materials. Monaco C; Kronenberger R; Talevi G; Pannone L; Cappello IA; Candelari M; Ramak R; Della Rocca DG; Bori E; Terryn H; Baert K; Laha P; Krasniqi A; Gharaviri A; Bala G; Chierchia GB; La Meir M; Innocenti B; de Asmundis C Biomedicines; 2024 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 38672223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of printing direction on stress distortion of three-dimensional printed dentures using stereolithography technology. Hada T; Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Minakuchi S J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103949. PubMed ID: 32957241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Susceptibility to biofilm formation on 3D-printed titanium fixation plates used in the mandible: a preliminary study. Palka L; Mazurek-Popczyk J; Arkusz K; Baldy-Chudzik K J Oral Microbiol; 2020 Oct; 12(1):1838164. PubMed ID: 33194115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of an acrylic resin combined with an antimicrobial polymer on biofilm formation. Marra J; Paleari AG; Rodriguez LS; Leite AR; Pero AC; Compagnoni MA J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(6):643-8. PubMed ID: 23329246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D-printed biosurfactant-chitosan antibacterial coating for the prevention of silicone-based associated infections. Narciso F; Cardoso S; Monge N; Lourenço M; Martin V; Duarte N; Santos C; Gomes P; Bettencourt A; Ribeiro IAC Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2023 Oct; 230():113486. PubMed ID: 37572399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]