These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37916035)

  • 1. Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections.
    Mongrain P
    Polit Res Q; 2023 Dec; 76(4):1589-1603. PubMed ID: 37916035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The costs of electoral fraud: establishing the link between electoral integrity, winning an election, and satisfaction with democracy.
    Fortin-Rittberger J; Harfst P; Dingler SC
    J Elect Public Opin Parties; 2017 Jul; 27(3):350-368. PubMed ID: 28824703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meddling in the 2016 Elections and Satisfaction With Democracy in the US.
    Justwan F; Baumgaertner B; Curtright M
    Polit Stud (Oxf); 2024 May; 72(2):505-526. PubMed ID: 38716045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas.
    Klimek P; Aykaç A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293239. PubMed ID: 37967045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electoral College bias and the 2020 presidential election.
    Erikson RS; Sigman K; Yao L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov; 117(45):27940-27944. PubMed ID: 33106408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testosterone fluctuations in response to a democratic election predict partisan attitudes toward the elected leader.
    Prasad S; Knight EL; Sarkar A; Welker KM; Lassetter B; Mehta PH
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2021 Nov; 133():105396. PubMed ID: 34508970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Election forensics: Using machine learning and synthetic data for possible election anomaly detection.
    Zhang M; Alvarez RM; Levin I
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223950. PubMed ID: 31671106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forensic analysis of Venezuelan elections during the Chávez presidency.
    Jiménez R; Hidalgo M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100884. PubMed ID: 24971462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The forensics of fraud: Evidence from the 2018 Brazilian presidential election.
    Figueiredo Filho D; Silva L; Carvalho E
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 5():100286. PubMed ID: 36176631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wishful thinking in the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
    Krizan Z; Miller JC; Johar O
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 20424035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Not by turnout alone: Measuring the sources of electoral change, 2012 to 2016.
    Hill SJ; Hopkins DJ; Huber GA
    Sci Adv; 2021 Apr; 7(17):. PubMed ID: 33883131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success
    Gerstlé J; Nai A
    Eur J Commun; 2019 Aug; 34(4):410-444. PubMed ID: 31534293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rejection of the status quo: Conspiracy theories and preference for alternative political systems.
    Papaioannou K; Pantazi M; van Prooijen JW
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38887120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Online engagement with 2020 election misinformation and turnout in the 2021 Georgia runoff election.
    Green J; Hobbs W; McCabe S; Lazer D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(34):e2115900119. PubMed ID: 35972960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
    Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Another issue comes out: gay rights policy voting in recent U.S. presidential elections.
    Rhodebeck LA
    J Homosex; 2015; 62(6):701-34. PubMed ID: 25530286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field experiment estimate of electoral fraud in Russian parliamentary elections.
    Enikolopov R; Korovkin V; Petrova M; Sonin K; Zakharov A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Jan; 110(2):448-52. PubMed ID: 23267093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 280 characters to the White House: predicting 2020 U.S. presidential elections from twitter data.
    Rizk R; Rizk D; Rizk F; Hsu S
    Comput Math Organ Theory; 2023 Mar; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 37360912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peace engineering: The contribution of blockchain systems to the e-voting process.
    Baudier P; Kondrateva G; Ammi C; Seulliet E
    Technol Forecast Soc Change; 2021 Jan; 162():120397. PubMed ID: 33071364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.