185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37917155)
1. Accuracy of 11 Wearable, Nearable, and Airable Consumer Sleep Trackers: Prospective Multicenter Validation Study.
Lee T; Cho Y; Cha KS; Jung J; Cho J; Kim H; Kim D; Hong J; Lee D; Keum M; Kushida CA; Yoon IY; Kim JW
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2023 Nov; 11():e50983. PubMed ID: 37917155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three Contactless Sleep Technologies Compared With Actigraphy and Polysomnography in a Heterogeneous Group of Older Men and Women in a Model of Mild Sleep Disturbance: Sleep Laboratory Study.
G Ravindran KK; Della Monica C; Atzori G; Lambert D; Hassanin H; Revell V; Dijk DJ
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2023 Oct; 11():e46338. PubMed ID: 37878360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selecting a sleep tracker from EEG-based, iteratively improved, low-cost multisensor, and actigraphy-only devices.
Ong JL; Golkashani HA; Ghorbani S; Wong KF; Chee NIYN; Willoughby AR; Chee MWL
Sleep Health; 2024 Feb; 10(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 38087674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity, potential clinical utility, and comparison of consumer and research-grade activity trackers in Insomnia Disorder I: In-lab validation against polysomnography.
Kahawage P; Jumabhoy R; Hamill K; de Zambotti M; Drummond SPA
J Sleep Res; 2020 Feb; 29(1):e12931. PubMed ID: 31626361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of Fitbit Charge 4, Garmin Vivosmart 4, and WHOOP Versus Polysomnography: Systematic Review.
Schyvens AM; Van Oost NC; Aerts JM; Masci F; Peters B; Neven A; Dirix H; Wets G; Ross V; Verbraecken J
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2024 Mar; 12():e52192. PubMed ID: 38557808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2™ compared with polysomnography in adults.
de Zambotti M; Goldstone A; Claudatos S; Colrain IM; Baker FC
Chronobiol Int; 2018 Apr; 35(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29235907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of Fitbit Charge 2 Sleep and Heart Rate Estimates Against Polysomnographic Measures in Shift Workers: Naturalistic Study.
Stucky B; Clark I; Azza Y; Karlen W; Achermann P; Kleim B; Landolt HP
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e26476. PubMed ID: 34609317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of Fitbit Charge 3 against polysomnography in measuring sleep in adolescent boys and girls.
Menghini L; Yuksel D; Goldstone A; Baker FC; de Zambotti M
Chronobiol Int; 2021 Jul; 38(7):1010-1022. PubMed ID: 33792456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of wearable sleep trackers during nocturnal sleep and periods of simulated real-world smartphone use.
Willoughby AR; Golkashani HA; Ghorbani S; Wong KF; Chee NIYN; Ong JL; Chee MWL
Sleep Health; 2024 Jun; 10(3):356-368. PubMed ID: 38570223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of seven consumer sleep-tracking devices compared with polysomnography.
Chinoy ED; Cuellar JA; Huwa KE; Jameson JT; Watson CH; Bessman SC; Hirsch DA; Cooper AD; Drummond SPA; Markwald RR
Sleep; 2021 May; 44(5):. PubMed ID: 33378539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of the Fitbit Charge 2 and Galaxy Watch 2 compared with polysomnography in assessing patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.
Byun JI; Noh KC; Shin WC
Chronobiol Int; 2023 May; 40(5):596-602. PubMed ID: 36971253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Measurement During an Ecologically Valid 24-Hour Period: Intraindividual Validation Study.
Nelson BW; Allen NB
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Mar; 7(3):e10828. PubMed ID: 30855232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metrology of two wearable sleep trackers against polysomnography in patients with sleep complaints.
Frija J; Mullaert J; Abensur Vuillaume L; Grajoszex M; Wanono R; Benzaquen H; Kerzabi F; Geoffroy PA; Matrot B; Trioux T; Penzel T; d'Ortho MP
J Sleep Res; 2024 Jun; ():e14235. PubMed ID: 38873908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detecting sleep using heart rate and motion data from multisensor consumer-grade wearables, relative to wrist actigraphy and polysomnography.
Roberts DM; Schade MM; Mathew GM; Gartenberg D; Buxton OM
Sleep; 2020 Jul; 43(7):. PubMed ID: 32215550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of Fitbit Charge 4 for assessing sleep in Chinese patients with chronic insomnia: A comparison against polysomnography and actigraphy.
Dong X; Yang S; Guo Y; Lv P; Wang M; Li Y
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275287. PubMed ID: 36256631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AI-Driven sleep staging from actigraphy and heart rate.
Song TA; Chowdhury SR; Malekzadeh M; Harrison S; Hoge TB; Redline S; Stone KL; Saxena R; Purcell SM; Dutta J
PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285703. PubMed ID: 37195925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of Fitbit Charge 2 and Fitbit Alta HR Against Polysomnography for Assessing Sleep in Adults With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Moreno-Pino F; Porras-Segovia A; López-Esteban P; Artés A; Baca-García E
J Clin Sleep Med; 2019 Nov; 15(11):1645-1653. PubMed ID: 31739855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating Accuracy in Five Commercial Sleep-Tracking Devices Compared to Research-Grade Actigraphy and Polysomnography.
Kainec KA; Caccavaro J; Barnes M; Hoff C; Berlin A; Spencer RMC
Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 38276327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance evaluation of Fitbit Charge 3 and actigraphy vs. polysomnography: Sensitivity, specificity, and reliability across participants and nights.
Eylon G; Tikotzky L; Dinstein I
Sleep Health; 2023 Aug; 9(4):407-416. PubMed ID: 37270397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Multi-Level Classification Approach for Sleep Stage Prediction With Processed Data Derived From Consumer Wearable Activity Trackers.
Liang Z; Chapa-Martell MA
Front Digit Health; 2021; 3():665946. PubMed ID: 34713139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
