These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37917425)

  • 21. Visual similarity effects in immediate serial recall and (sometimes) in immediate serial recognition.
    Chubala CM; Guitard D; Neath I; Saint-Aubin J; Surprenant AM
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):411-425. PubMed ID: 31701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reexamining the phonological similarity effect in immediate serial recall: the roles of type of similarity, category cuing, and item recall.
    Gupta P; Lipinski J; Aktunc E
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1001-16. PubMed ID: 16496721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lexicality and phonological similarity: a challenge for the retrieval-based account of serial recall?
    Fallon AB; Mak E; Tehan G; Daly C
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):349-56. PubMed ID: 15948620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Auditory word serial recall benefits from orthographic dissimilarity.
    Pattamadilok C; Lafontaine H; Morais J; Kolinsky R
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 3):321-41. PubMed ID: 21033650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Coltheart V; Langdon R
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of stimulus set size and word frequency on verbal serial recall.
    Roodenrys S; Quinlan PT
    Memory; 2000 Mar; 8(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 10829124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Semantic contribution to verbal short-term memory: are pleasant words easier to remember than neutral words in serial recall and serial recognition?
    Monnier C; Syssau A
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jan; 36(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 18323060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lexical connectivity effects in immediate serial recall of words.
    Mak MHC; Hsiao Y; Nation K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Dec; 47(12):1971-1997. PubMed ID: 34735167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Opposing effects of phonological similarity on item and order memory of words and nonwords in the serial recall task.
    Lian A; Karlsen PJ; Eriksen TB
    Memory; 2004 May; 12(3):314-37. PubMed ID: 15279435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of immediate serial recall and immediate serial recognition.
    Chubala CM; Neath I; Surprenant AM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Mar; 73(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 30556716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Revisiting distinctive processes in memory.
    Cortese MJ; Watson JM; Khanna MM; McCallion M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Jun; 13(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 17048729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The phonographic language network: Using network science to investigate the phonological and orthographic similarity structure of language.
    Siew CSQ; Vitevitch MS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):475-500. PubMed ID: 30802126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.
    Coltheart V
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 8350745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Individual differences in phonological learning and verbal STM span.
    Service E; Maury S; Luotoniemi E
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1122-35. PubMed ID: 17910194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exploring the use of phonological and semantic representations in working memory.
    Cowan N; Guitard D; Greene NR; Fiset S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1638-1659. PubMed ID: 35007100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The time-based word length effect and stimulus set specificity.
    Neath I; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Jun; 10(2):430-4. PubMed ID: 12921420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The curious case of orthographic distinctiveness: Disruption of categorical processing.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill MJ; Bugg JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 26237617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The phonological neighbourhood effect on short-term memory for order.
    Clarkson L; Roodenrys S; Miller LM; Hulme C
    Memory; 2017 Mar; 25(3):391-402. PubMed ID: 27188831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.