152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37917785)
1. Questionable research practices in competitive grant funding: A survey.
Conix S; De Peuter S; Block A; Vaesen K
PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293310. PubMed ID: 37917785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists' Engagement in Questionable Research Practices.
Sacco DF; Bruton SV; Brown M
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 29179623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Individual, institutional, and scientific environment factors associated with questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in scientific health services research publications.
Gerrits RG; Mulyanto J; Wammes JD; van den Berg MJ; Klazinga NS; Kringos DS
BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Sep; 20(1):828. PubMed ID: 32883306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers.
Kaiser M; Drivdal L; Hjellbrekke J; Ingierd H; Rekdal OB
Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Dec; 28(1):2. PubMed ID: 34932191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occurrence and nature of questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in international scientific Health Services Research publications: a structured assessment of publications authored by researchers in the Netherlands.
Gerrits RG; Jansen T; Mulyanto J; van den Berg MJ; Klazinga NS; Kringos DS
BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027903. PubMed ID: 31097488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical Shades of Gray: International Frequency of Scientific Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices in Health Professions Education.
Artino AR; Driessen EW; Maggio LA
Acad Med; 2019 Jan; 94(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 30113363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-research: justifying career disruption in funding applications, a survey of Australian researchers.
Barnett A; Page K; Dyer C; Cramb S
Elife; 2022 Apr; 11():. PubMed ID: 35373737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands.
Gopalakrishna G; Ter Riet G; Vink G; Stoop I; Wicherts JM; Bouter LM
PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263023. PubMed ID: 35171921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research.
Ravn T; Sørensen MP
Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jun; 27(4):40. PubMed ID: 34136962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Questionable research practices of medical and dental faculty in Pakistan - a confession.
Fahim A; Sadaf A; Jafari FH; Siddique K; Sethi A
BMC Med Ethics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):11. PubMed ID: 38297258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Grounds for Ambiguity: Justifiable Bases for Engaging in Questionable Research Practices.
Sacco DF; Brown M; Bruton SV
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Oct; 25(5):1321-1337. PubMed ID: 30259269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Questionable research practices among Brazilian psychological researchers: Results from a replication study and an international comparison.
Rabelo ALA; Farias JEM; Sarmet MM; Joaquim TCR; Hoersting RC; Victorino L; Modesto JGN; Pilati R
Int J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 55(4):674-683. PubMed ID: 31745980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Handling Anomalous Data in the Lab: Students' Perspectives on Deleting and Discarding.
Johansen MW; Christiansen FV
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):1107-1128. PubMed ID: 32166525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education.
Maggio L; Dong T; Driessen E; Artino A
Perspect Med Educ; 2019 Apr; 8(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 30915714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the research grant program of the Foundation of the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists, 1995-2008.
Zed PJ; Ensom MH; Slavik RS; Wilbur K; Kanji S; Koshman SL; Irvine-Meek J; Perreault M; Zelenitsky S
Can J Hosp Pharm; 2011 Nov; 64(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 22479094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution.
Fraser H; Parker T; Nakagawa S; Barnett A; Fidler F
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200303. PubMed ID: 30011289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing for Questionable Research Practices in a Meta-Analysis: An Example from Experimental Parapsychology.
Bierman DJ; Spottiswoode JP; Bijl A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0153049. PubMed ID: 27144889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Questionable research practices in student final theses - Prevalence, attitudes, and the role of the supervisor's perceived attitudes.
Krishna A; Peter SM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203470. PubMed ID: 30161249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skin in the Game: Personal Accountability and Journal Peer Review.
Sacco DF; Bruton SV; Brown M; Medlin MM
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):330-338. PubMed ID: 32425095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing an active intervention to deter researchers' use of questionable research practices.
Bruton SV; Brown M; Sacco DF; Didlake R
Res Integr Peer Rev; 2019; 4():24. PubMed ID: 31798975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]