These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37917785)

  • 41. A Ten-Year Analysis of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding for Anesthesiology Research in United States Medical Schools.
    Pagel PS
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2022 Jul; 36(7):1844-1855. PubMed ID: 35339356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Ethical Consistency and Experience: An Attempt to Influence Researcher Attitudes Toward Questionable Research Practices Through Reading Prompts.
    Bruton SV; Brown M; Sacco DF
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Jul; 15(3):216-226. PubMed ID: 31865855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Researchers on research integrity: a survey of European and American researchers.
    Allum N; Reid A; Bidoglia M; Gaskell G; Aubert-Bonn N; Buljan I; Fuglsang S; Horbach S; Kavouras P; Marušić A; Mejlgaard N; Pizzolato D; Roje R; Tijdink J; Veltri G
    F1000Res; 2023; 12():187. PubMed ID: 37455853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessing the Efficacy of a Training Intervention to Reduce Acceptance of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology Graduate Students.
    Sacco DF; Brown M
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Jul; 14(3):209-218. PubMed ID: 30943835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Playing with Data--Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right.
    Sijtsma K
    Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 25820980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Impact of an institutional grant award on early career investigator applicants and peer reviewers.
    Mughal A; Wahlberg KJ; Li Z; Flyer JN; Olson NC; Cushman M
    Res Pract Thromb Haemost; 2021 Jul; 5(5):e12555. PubMed ID: 34263104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Institutions' expectations for researchers' self-funding, federal grant holding, and private industry involvement: manifold drivers of self-interest and researcher behavior.
    Martinson BC; Crain AL; Anderson MS; De Vries R
    Acad Med; 2009 Nov; 84(11):1491-9. PubMed ID: 19858802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The association for surgical education CESERT grant program: the first 15 years.
    Gardner AK; Sudan R; Sidhu R; Mann BD; Scott DJ
    Am J Surg; 2015 Jan; 209(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 25454966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Impact of Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation awards on subsequent grant funding and career outcomes of neurosurgeon-scientists.
    Javeed S; Pugazenthi S; Huguenard AL; Haid RW; Groff MW; Limbrick DD; Zipfel GJ
    J Neurosurg; 2023 Jul; 139(1):255-265. PubMed ID: 36585865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Grant application and review procedures of the National Institute of Handicapped Research: survey of applicant and peer reviewer opinions.
    Fuhrer MJ; Grabois M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1985 May; 66(5):318-21. PubMed ID: 3159374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. 'Are you siding with a personality or the grant proposal?': observations on how peer review panels function.
    Coveney J; Herbert DL; Hill K; Mow KE; Graves N; Barnett A
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2017; 2():19. PubMed ID: 29451548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion.
    Gallo SA; Schmaling KB; Thompson LA; Glisson SR
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2020; 5():7. PubMed ID: 32467777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessing researchers' capabilities, opportunities, and motivation to conduct equity-oriented dissemination and implementation research, an exploratory cross-sectional study.
    Baumann AA; Woodward EN; Singh RS; Adsul P; Shelton RC
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Jun; 22(1):731. PubMed ID: 35650573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.
    Carter YH; Shaw S; Macfarlane F
    Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract; 2002 Feb; (81):iii-vi, 1-72. PubMed ID: 12049028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of a program supporting scholarly productivity for new investigators.
    Mavis B; Katz M
    Acad Med; 2003 Jul; 78(7):757-65. PubMed ID: 12857699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Unfilled Prescriptions of Medicare Beneficiaries: Prevalence, Reasons, and Types of Medicines Prescribed.
    Kennedy J; Tuleu I; Mackay K
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2020 Aug; 26(8):935-942. PubMed ID: 32715958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Bias in Research Grant Evaluation Has Dire Consequences for Small Universities.
    Murray DL; Morris D; Lavoie C; Leavitt PR; MacIsaac H; Masson ME; Villard MA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0155876. PubMed ID: 27258385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Gender differences in grant and personnel award funding rates at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research based on research content area: A retrospective analysis.
    Burns KEA; Straus SE; Liu K; Rizvi L; Guyatt G
    PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002935. PubMed ID: 31613898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluating public involvement in research design and grant development: Using a qualitative document analysis method to analyse an award scheme for researchers.
    Baxter S; Muir D; Brereton L; Allmark C; Barber R; Harris L; Hodges B; Khan S; Baird W
    Res Involv Engagem; 2016; 2():13. PubMed ID: 29062514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.