314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3791824)
1. Deciding not to treat--medical, legal, and ethical considerations.
Black PM
Clin Neurosurg; 1986; 33():93-104. PubMed ID: 3791824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment.
Sappington GM
J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Deciding for others. Issues of consent.
McThenia AW
Second Opin; 1987; (5):76-99. PubMed ID: 10284749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Euthanasia: where are we? Where are we going?
Fish MS
Leg Med; 1987; ():200-12. PubMed ID: 3504981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Planning ahead for difficult health care decisions.
Mishkin B
Healthspan; 1987 Apr; 4(4):3-25. PubMed ID: 10281748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to treat a component adult who refuses treatment to prolong life.
Frey RO
Med Trial Tech Q; 1981; 27(4):432-42. PubMed ID: 7253852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Aspects of the dilemma: when and how should treatment be withheld or withdrawn?
Frelick RW
Del Med J; 1989 Jun; 61(6):305-7. PubMed ID: 2753191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Life-support withdrawal: law of commiseration or principle?
Byrnes JC
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):331-54. PubMed ID: 11651213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The biology of the persistent vegetative state: legal, ethical, and philosophical implications for transplantation.
Downie J
Transplant Proc; 1990 Jun; 22(3):995-6. PubMed ID: 2349730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nutritional discontinuation: active or passive euthanasia?
Banja JD
J Neurosci Nurs; 1990 Apr; 22(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 2139682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The silent clients: legal and ethical considerations in representing severely and profoundly retarded individuals.
Mickenberg NH
Stanford Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 31(4):625-35. PubMed ID: 10242372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Voluntary euthanasia: private and public imperatives.
Bok S
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(3):19-20. PubMed ID: 8088997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Autonomy and the critically ill patient: the legal issues.
Moskowitz LD; Moskowitz S
Heart Lung; 1986 Sep; 15(5):520-4. PubMed ID: 3639078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Debate on the boundary of life. Medical miracles and the patient's right to die.
Tifft S
Time; 1983 Apr; 121(15):68-70. PubMed ID: 10259779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. "Right to die": an update.
Weyhing RL; Sullivan MJ
Mich Hosp; 1985 Jun; 21(6):15-7. PubMed ID: 10271591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
Harner SR
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing issues in medical decision making: the durable power of attorney and institutional ethics committees.
Doudera AE
Prim Care; 1986 Jun; 13(2):315-26. PubMed ID: 3636934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient autonomy in intensive care.
Miller BL
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 139():111-24. PubMed ID: 6669532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal issues affecting the older patient.
Baker FM
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1986 Nov; 37(11):1091-3. PubMed ID: 3781498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Deciding right-to-die cases involving incompetent patients: Jones v. Saikewicz.
Schultz S; Swartz W; Appelbaum JC
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):936-58. PubMed ID: 11664848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
