126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37918341)
1. Atypical architectural distortion detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: a multi-view computer-aided detection model with ipsilateral learning.
Pan J; He Z; Li Y; Zeng W; Guo Y; Jia L; Jiang H; Chen W; Lu Y
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Nov; 68(23):. PubMed ID: 37918341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Architectural distortion detection based on superior-inferior directional context and anatomic prior knowledge in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Li Y; He Z; Ma X; Zeng W; Liu J; Xu W; Xu Z; Wang S; Wen C; Zeng H; Wu J; Chen W; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3749-3768. PubMed ID: 35338787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atypical architectural distortion detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: a computer-aided detection model with adaptive receptive field.
Li Y; He Z; Pan J; Zeng W; Liu J; Zeng Z; Xu W; Xu Z; Wang S; Wen C; Zeng H; Wu J; Ma X; Chen W; Lu Y
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Feb; 68(4):. PubMed ID: 36595312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Deep learning of mammary gland distribution for architectural distortion detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Li Y; He Z; Lu Y; Ma X; Guo Y; Xie Z; Qin G; Xu W; Xu Z; Chen W; Chen H
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jan; 66(3):035028. PubMed ID: 32485700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing breast lesion detection algorithms for digital breast tomosynthesis: Leveraging false positive findings.
Hossain MB; Nishikawa RM; Lee J
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7596-7608. PubMed ID: 35916103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis.
Gennaro G; Hendrick RE; Toledano A; Paquelet JR; Bezzon E; Chersevani R; di Maggio C; La Grassa M; Pescarini L; Polico I; Proietti A; Baldan E; Pomerri F; Muzzio PC
Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2087-94. PubMed ID: 23620367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion.
Dibble EH; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Ward RC; Maynard AS; Mainiero MB
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 28710582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CAPNet: Context attention pyramid network for computer-aided detection of microcalcification clusters in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Wang J; Sun H; Jiang K; Cao W; Chen S; Zhu J; Yang X; Zheng J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Dec; 242():107831. PubMed ID: 37783114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
Mendel K; Li H; Sheth D; Giger M
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 30076083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast Cancer Conspicuity on Simultaneously Acquired Digital Mammographic Images versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
Korhonen KE; Conant EF; Cohen EA; Synnestvedt M; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31084481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pathologic Outcomes in Single Versus Multiple Areas of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Wang LC; Philip M; Bhole S; Rao S; Gupta D; Schacht D; Friedewald SM; Anders R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jan; 220(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 35895298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided detection of breast masses: four-view strategy for screening mammography.
Wei J; Chan HP; Zhou C; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1867-76. PubMed ID: 21626920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital tomosynthesis spot view in architectural distortions: outcomes in management and radiation dose.
Fiaschetti V; Ubaldi N; De Fazio S; Ricci A; Maspes F; Cossu E
Radiol Med; 2023 Jan; 128(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 36534241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Replacing single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital mammography (DM) with synthesized mammography (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images: Comparison of the diagnostic performance and radiation dose with two-view DM with or without MLO-DBT.
Kang HJ; Chang JM; Lee J; Song SE; Shin SU; Kim WH; Bae MS; Moon WK
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2042-2048. PubMed ID: 27776658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strategies to Increase Cancer Detection: Review of True-Positive and False-Negative Results at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening.
Korhonen KE; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
Radiographics; 2016; 36(7):1954-1965. PubMed ID: 27715711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
