These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37918693)
1. Use of dual mobility cup cemented into a tantalum acetabular shell for hip revision with large bone loss can decrease dislocation risk without increasing the risk of mechanical failure. Hitz O; Le Baron M; Jacquet C; Argenson JN; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Flecher X Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 Apr; 110(2):103739. PubMed ID: 37918693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips. Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cementing a Monoblock Dual-Mobility Implant into a Fully Porous Cup in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty to Address Hip Instability: Surgical Technique. Shichman I; Habibi AA; Robin JX; Gemayel AC; Lowe DT; Schwarzkopf R JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38357466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft]. Parratte S; Argenson JN; Flecher X; Aubaniac JM Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 May; 93(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 17534208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low Revision Rates at More Than 10 Years for Dual-Mobility Cups Cemented Into Cages in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Sayac G; Neri T; Schneider L; Philippot R; Farizon F; Boyer B J Arthroplasty; 2020 Feb; 35(2):513-519. PubMed ID: 31543421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up. Lebeau N; Bayle M; Belhaouane R; Chelli M; Havet E; Brunschweiler B; Mertl P Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):679-684. PubMed ID: 28578096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do tantalum components provide adequate primary fixation in all acetabular revisions? Flecher X; Paprosky W; Grillo JC; Aubaniac JM; Argenson JN Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 May; 96(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 20488141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up. Löchel J; Janz V; Hipfl C; Perka C; Wassilew GI Bone Joint J; 2019 Mar; 101-B(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30813786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What is the failure rate of constrained liners in complex revision total hip arthroplasty? Unter Ecker N; Piakong P; Delgado G; Gehrke T; Citak M; Ohlmeier M Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Mar; 143(3):1671-1678. PubMed ID: 35377048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Highly Porous Acetabular Cup and Augment Constructs in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: What Predicts 10-Year Implant Survivorship? Alter TD; Hadley ML; Couch CG; Fruth KM; Bedard NA; Perry KI; Sierra RJ; Lewallen DG J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S1):S194-S202. PubMed ID: 38599525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimum Five-Year Outcomes with Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup and Augment Construct in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Jenkins DR; Odland AN; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):e49. PubMed ID: 28509833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup. Schneider L; Philippot R; Boyer B; Farizon F Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 97(8):807-13. PubMed ID: 22119512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effects of trabecular metal augments for the reconstruction of Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabulum bone defects]. Du YQ; Zhou YG; Piao S; Wu WM; Ma HY; Gao ZS; Sun JY; Zheng C; Wang S Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 55(6):410-415. PubMed ID: 28592072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term results of combined porous tantalum augments and titanium-coated cups for Paprosky type III bone defects in acetabular revision. Xiao Q; Xu B; Zhou K; Ling T; Yuan M; Pei F; Zhou Z Int Orthop; 2021 Jul; 45(7):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 34019127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases. Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of dual-mobility acetabular implants on revision and survivorship of cup and Kerboull-type reinforcement ring constructs in aseptic acetabular loosening. Bozon O; Dagneaux L; Sanchez T; Gaillard F; Hamoui M; Canovas F Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 108(2):103071. PubMed ID: 34560312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Use of Porous Tantalum Augments for the Reconstruction of Acetabular Defect in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. Ling TX; Li JL; Zhou K; Xiao Q; Pei FX; Zhou ZK J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):453-459. PubMed ID: 29033154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of a Double-Cup Construct to Treat Paprosky 3A and 3B Acetabular Defects at a Mean of 39 Months. Liu Q; Zhang RW; Ma RX; Zhu WB; Zhang XZ; Zhu C J Arthroplasty; 2024 Nov; 39(11):2841-2848. PubMed ID: 38823520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual-mobility cups in revision acetabular reconstructions: Short-term outcomes in high-risk patients for instability. Dikmen G; Ozden VE; Karaytug K; Tozun R Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2019 Sep; 53(5):329-333. PubMed ID: 31281078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]