247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37918693)
1. Use of dual mobility cup cemented into a tantalum acetabular shell for hip revision with large bone loss can decrease dislocation risk without increasing the risk of mechanical failure.
Hitz O; Le Baron M; Jacquet C; Argenson JN; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Flecher X
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 Apr; 110(2):103739. PubMed ID: 37918693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cementing a Monoblock Dual-Mobility Implant into a Fully Porous Cup in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty to Address Hip Instability: Surgical Technique.
Shichman I; Habibi AA; Robin JX; Gemayel AC; Lowe DT; Schwarzkopf R
JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38357466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].
Parratte S; Argenson JN; Flecher X; Aubaniac JM
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 May; 93(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 17534208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low Revision Rates at More Than 10 Years for Dual-Mobility Cups Cemented Into Cages in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Sayac G; Neri T; Schneider L; Philippot R; Farizon F; Boyer B
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Feb; 35(2):513-519. PubMed ID: 31543421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up.
Lebeau N; Bayle M; Belhaouane R; Chelli M; Havet E; Brunschweiler B; Mertl P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):679-684. PubMed ID: 28578096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do tantalum components provide adequate primary fixation in all acetabular revisions?
Flecher X; Paprosky W; Grillo JC; Aubaniac JM; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 May; 96(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 20488141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up.
Löchel J; Janz V; Hipfl C; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2019 Mar; 101-B(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30813786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cemented dual-mobility constructs in uncemented revision acetabular components.
Wilson JM; Trousdale RT; Bedard NA; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2024 Apr; 106-B(4):352-358. PubMed ID: 38555941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What is the failure rate of constrained liners in complex revision total hip arthroplasty?
Unter Ecker N; Piakong P; Delgado G; Gehrke T; Citak M; Ohlmeier M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Mar; 143(3):1671-1678. PubMed ID: 35377048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimum Five-Year Outcomes with Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup and Augment Construct in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Jenkins DR; Odland AN; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):e49. PubMed ID: 28509833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup.
Schneider L; Philippot R; Boyer B; Farizon F
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 97(8):807-13. PubMed ID: 22119512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effects of trabecular metal augments for the reconstruction of Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabulum bone defects].
Du YQ; Zhou YG; Piao S; Wu WM; Ma HY; Gao ZS; Sun JY; Zheng C; Wang S
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 55(6):410-415. PubMed ID: 28592072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term results of combined porous tantalum augments and titanium-coated cups for Paprosky type III bone defects in acetabular revision.
Xiao Q; Xu B; Zhou K; Ling T; Yuan M; Pei F; Zhou Z
Int Orthop; 2021 Jul; 45(7):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 34019127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.
Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of dual-mobility acetabular implants on revision and survivorship of cup and Kerboull-type reinforcement ring constructs in aseptic acetabular loosening.
Bozon O; Dagneaux L; Sanchez T; Gaillard F; Hamoui M; Canovas F
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 108(2):103071. PubMed ID: 34560312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Use of Porous Tantalum Augments for the Reconstruction of Acetabular Defect in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Ling TX; Li JL; Zhou K; Xiao Q; Pei FX; Zhou ZK
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):453-459. PubMed ID: 29033154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual-mobility cups in revision acetabular reconstructions: Short-term outcomes in high-risk patients for instability.
Dikmen G; Ozden VE; Karaytug K; Tozun R
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2019 Sep; 53(5):329-333. PubMed ID: 31281078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tantalum Components in Difficult Acetabular Revisions Have Good Survival at 5 to 10 Years: Longer Term Followup of a Previous Report.
Lachiewicz PF; O'Dell JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 29529665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a Kerboull plate: comparative outcomes using standard versus dual mobility cups.
Assi C; Caton J; Fawaz W; Samaha C; Yammine K
Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2245-2251. PubMed ID: 30370452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
