These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37919615)

  • 41. Comparing holistic and analytic scoring for performance assessment with many-facet Rasch model.
    Chi E
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 12011505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Can rasch analysis enhance the abstract ranking process in scientific conferences? Issues of interrater variability and abstract rating burden.
    Scanlan JN; Lannin NA; Hoffmann T
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2015; 35(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 25799969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Psychometric properties of a standardized-patient checklist and rating-scale form used to assess interpersonal and communication skills.
    Cohen DS; Colliver JA; Marcy MS; Fried ED; Swartz MH
    Acad Med; 1996 Jan; 71(1 Suppl):S87-9. PubMed ID: 8546794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Broadening perspectives on clinical performance assessment: rethinking the nature of in-training assessment.
    Govaerts MJ; van der Vleuten CP; Schuwirth LW; Muijtjens AM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2007 May; 12(2):239-60. PubMed ID: 17096207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of examinee gender, standardized-patient gender, and their interaction on standardized patients' ratings of examinees' interpersonal and communication skills.
    Colliver JA; Vu NV; Marcy ML; Travis TA; Robbs RS
    Acad Med; 1993 Feb; 68(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 8431238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluating the use of the EORTC patient-reported outcome measures for improving inter-rater reliability of CTCAE ratings in a mixed population of cancer patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Wintner LM; Giesinger JM; Sztankay M; Bottomley A; Holzner B;
    Trials; 2020 Oct; 21(1):849. PubMed ID: 33050917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain: The overlooked issue of rater selection in psychotherapy observer ratings.
    Ezawa ID; Bartels GC; Pfeifer BJ; Strunk DR
    Psychother Res; 2021 Apr; 31(4):548-556. PubMed ID: 32552478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Rater severity differences in English language as a second language speaking assessment based on rating experience, training experience, and teaching experience through many-faceted Rasch measurement analysis.
    Mohd Noh MF; Mohd Matore MEE
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():941084. PubMed ID: 35936278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Modeling error variance in job specification ratings: the influence of rater, job, and organization-level factors.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Raymark PH; Eidson CE
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):323-34. PubMed ID: 15769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of Differential Rater Functioning in Latent Classes with New Mixture Facets Models.
    Jin KY; Wang WC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):391-402. PubMed ID: 28328280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Measuring satisfaction with migraine treatment: expectations, importance, outcomes, and global ratings.
    Patrick DL; Martin ML; Bushnell DM; Pesa J
    Clin Ther; 2003 Nov; 25(11):2920-35. PubMed ID: 14693316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Essay Selection Methods for Adaptive Rater Monitoring.
    Wang C; Song T; Wang Z; Wolfe E
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Jan; 41(1):60-79. PubMed ID: 29881078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparative Analysis of Two Methods of Perceptual Voice Assessment.
    Feinstein H; Daşdöğen Ü; Awan JA; Awan SN; Abbott KV
    J Voice; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36907680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A Bayesian hierarchical latent trait model for estimating rater bias and reliability in large-scale performance assessment.
    Zupanc K; Štrumbelj E
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195297. PubMed ID: 29614129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Exploring Within-Rater Category Ordering: A Simulation Study Using Adjacent-Categories Mokken Scale Analysis.
    Wind SA; Schumacker RE
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Oct; 78(5):887-904. PubMed ID: 32655174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The raters' differences in Arabic writing rubrics through the Many-Facet Rasch measurement model.
    Baharudin H; Maskor ZM; Matore MEEM
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():988272. PubMed ID: 36591072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Item Response Theory Modeling for Examinee-selected Items with Rater Effect.
    Liu CW; Qiu XL; Wang WC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Sep; 43(6):435-448. PubMed ID: 31452553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Inter-rater variability as mutual disagreement: identifying raters' divergent points of view.
    Gingerich A; Ramlo SE; van der Vleuten CPM; Eva KW; Regehr G
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 22(4):819-838. PubMed ID: 27651046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: part I.
    Myford CM; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(4):386-422. PubMed ID: 14523257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.