143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37920165)
1. The expression of Ki-67 and Glypican -3 in hepatocellular carcinoma was evaluated by comparing DWI and
Wang X; Li L; Wang L; Chen M
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1026245. PubMed ID: 37920165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of diffusion kurtosis imaging and
Feng P; Shao Z; Dong B; Fang T; Huang Z; Li Z; Fu F; Wu Y; Wei W; Yuan J; Yang Y; Wang Z; Wang M
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():989131. PubMed ID: 36248958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.
Kitajima K; Yamano T; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y; Hirota S; Kawanaka Y; Miya M; Doi H; Yamakado K; Hirota S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 27130054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of Simultaneous
Huang Z; Li X; Wang Z; Meng N; Fu F; Han H; Li D; Bai Y; Wei W; Fang T; Feng P; Yuan J; Yang Y; Wang M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jul; 56(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 34888990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The utility of ADC value in diffusion-weighted whole-body MRI in the follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma. Correlation study with
Paternain A; García-Velloso MJ; Rosales JJ; Ezponda A; Soriano I; Elorz M; Rodríguez-Otero P; Aquerreta JD
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Dec; 133():109403. PubMed ID: 33202373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison study of monoexponential and fractional order calculus diffusion models and
Luo Y; Jiang H; Meng N; Huang Z; Li Z; Feng P; Fang T; Fu F; Yuan J; Wang Z; Yang Y; Wang M
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():907860. PubMed ID: 35936757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic values of ALDOB expression and
Jia W; Wu Q; Yu X; Shen M; Zhang R; Li J; Zhao L; Huang G; Liu J
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1044902. PubMed ID: 36644641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative parameters of static imaging and fast kinetics imaging in
Meng N; Zhang M; Ren J; Fu F; Xie B; Wu Y; Li Z; Dai B; Li Y; Feng T; Xu T; Wang M
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Sep; 13(9):5579-5592. PubMed ID: 37711783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring the efficacy of
Yin Y; Liu J; Sun R; Liu X; Zhou Z; Zhang H; Li D
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Nov; 48(11):3408-3419. PubMed ID: 37682282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10.
Zhou W; Wen J; Hua F; Xu W; Lu X; Yin B; Geng D; Guan Y
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 104():26-32. PubMed ID: 29857862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the SUVmax of FDG-PET/CT Correlate with the ADC Values of DWI in Musculoskeletal Malignancies?
Ozturk M; Polat AV; Tosun FC; Selcuk MB
J Belg Soc Radiol; 2021 Feb; 105(1):11. PubMed ID: 33665542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new method for apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using sequential (18)F-FDG PET and MRI: correlation with histological grade of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Byun BH; Noh WC; Lim I; Lee SS; Cho AR; Park JA; Kim KM; Kim HA; Kim EK; Kim BI; Choi CW; Lim SM
Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Oct; 27(8):720-8. PubMed ID: 23700260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiparametric FDG-PET/MRI of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Initial Experience.
Hectors SJ; Wagner M; Besa C; Huang W; Taouli B
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():5638283. PubMed ID: 30402045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic FDG-PET imaging for differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes of lung cancer.
Wumener X; Zhang Y; Wang Z; Zhang M; Zang Z; Huang B; Liu M; Huang S; Huang Y; Wang P; Liang Y; Sun T
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1005924. PubMed ID: 36439506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient with simultaneous MR/positron emission tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: comparison with 18F-FDG-PET.
Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H; Gatidis S; Brendle C; Müller M; Königsrainer I; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg AC; Schraml C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1121-8. PubMed ID: 24923481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Su W; Zhao S; Chen Y; Zuo C; Cui B; Wang M; Ren F
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Mar; 45(3):743-749. PubMed ID: 31907569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The correlation of
Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The value of (18)F-FDG PET-CT imaging in predicting the malignant potential of GIST].
Li SX; Tang MD; Lin DY; Liu DJ; Lyu QH; Zhang JP; Cai ZH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 39(11):821-827. PubMed ID: 29151288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative parameters of MRI and
Gelezhe PB; Blokhin IA; Marapov DI; Morozov SP
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020; 10(6):279-292. PubMed ID: 33329930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions: initial results.
Heusch P; Buchbender C; Köhler J; Nensa F; Beiderwellen K; Kühl H; Lanzman RS; Wittsack HJ; Gomez B; Gauler T; Schuler M; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Rofo; 2013 Nov; 185(11):1056-62. PubMed ID: 23860802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
