BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37921396)

  • 1. Efficient image reconstruction for a small animal PET system with dual-layer-offset detector design.
    Cheng L; Lyu Z; Liu H; Wu J; Jia C; Wu Y; Ji Y; Jiang N; Ma T; Liu Y
    Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2772-2787. PubMed ID: 37921396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and evaluation of a LOR-based image reconstruction with 3D system response modeling for a PET insert with dual-layer offset crystal design.
    Zhang X; Stortz G; Sossi V; Thompson CJ; Retière F; Kozlowski P; Thiessen JD; Goertzen AL
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 58(23):8379-99. PubMed ID: 24217067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. LOR-interleaving image reconstruction for PET imaging with fractional-crystal collimation.
    Li Y; Matej S; Karp JS; Metzler SD
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(2):647-70. PubMed ID: 25555160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PET/SPECT/spectral-CT/CBCT imaging in a small-animal radiation therapy platform: A Monte Carlo study-Part I: Quad-modal imaging.
    Wang H; Li X; Xu L; Kuang Y
    Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2941-2954. PubMed ID: 38421665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility study of a point-of-care positron emission tomography system with interactive imaging capability.
    Jiang J; Li K; Komarov S; O'Sullivan JA; Tai YC
    Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 30667069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DH-Mammo PET: a dual-head positron emission mammography system for breast imaging.
    Shi Y; Wang Y; Zhou J; Zhu Y; Lyu X; Hui H; Wen B; Liu Y; Li L; Li J; Meng F; Kang F; Zhu S
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Oct; 67(20):. PubMed ID: 36126658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Virtual cylindrical PET for efficient DOI image reconstruction with sub-millimetre resolution.
    Enríquez-Mier-Y-Terán FE; Kyme AZ; Angelis G; Meikle SR
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(11):. PubMed ID: 38749466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance evaluation of a high-resolution brain PET scanner using four-layer MPPC DOI detectors.
    Watanabe M; Saito A; Isobe T; Ote K; Yamada R; Moriya T; Omura T
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):7148-7166. PubMed ID: 28753133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image reconstructions from super-sampled data sets with resolution modeling in PET imaging.
    Li Y; Matej S; Metzler SD
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121912. PubMed ID: 25471972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analytical, experimental, and Monte Carlo system response matrix for pinhole SPECT reconstruction.
    Aguiar P; Pino F; Silva-Rodríguez J; Pavía J; Ros D; Ruibal A; El Bitar Z
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032501. PubMed ID: 24593739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the spline reconstruction technique for PET.
    Kastis GA; Kyriakopoulou D; Gaitanis A; Fernández Y; Hutton BF; Fokas AS
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042501. PubMed ID: 24694154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Applications of the line-of-response probability density function resolution model in PET list mode reconstruction.
    Jian Y; Yao R; Mulnix T; Jin X; Carson RE
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):253-78. PubMed ID: 25490063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial resolution recovery utilizing multi-ray tracing and graphic processing unit in PET image reconstruction.
    Liang Y; Peng H
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 60(3):1217-36. PubMed ID: 25591118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
    Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance evaluation of the Trans-PET® BioCaliburn® LH system: a large FOV small-animal PET system.
    Wang L; Zhu J; Liang X; Niu M; Wu X; Kao CM; Kim H; Xie Q
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 25479202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of ray profile modeling on resolution recovery in clinical CT.
    Hofmann C; Knaup M; Kachelrieß M
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021907. PubMed ID: 24506628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and assessment of a novel SPECT system for desktop open-gantry imaging of small animals: A simulation study.
    Zeraatkar N; Farahani MH; Rahmim A; Sarkar S; Ay MR
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2581. PubMed ID: 27147368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultra-low dose CT attenuation correction for PET/CT: analysis of sparse view data acquisition and reconstruction algorithms.
    Rui X; Cheng L; Long Y; Fu L; Alessio AM; Asma E; Kinahan PE; De Man B
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(19):7437-60. PubMed ID: 26352168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of quantitative, efficient image reconstruction for VersaPET, a compact PET system.
    Wei S; Vaska P
    Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2852-2868. PubMed ID: 32219853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate Monte Carlo modeling and performance assessment of the X-PET subsystem of the FLEX triumph preclinical PET/CT scanner.
    Zeraatkar N; Ay MR; Kamali-Asl AR; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1217-25. PubMed ID: 21520834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.