These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37921971)

  • 1. Predicting the ovarian response: towards a determinant model and implications for practice.
    Arvis P; Rongières C; Pirrello O; Lehert P
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Jan; 41(1):213-222. PubMed ID: 37921971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The addition of anti-Müllerian hormone in an algorithm for individualized hormone dosage did not improve the prediction of ovarian response-a randomized, controlled trial.
    Magnusson Å; Nilsson L; Oleröd G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):811-819. PubMed ID: 28175316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of antimüllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as predictor of ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good-prognosis patients at individual fertility clinics in two multicenter trials.
    Nelson SM; Klein BM; Arce JC
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):923-930.e1. PubMed ID: 25624196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve Tests and Age in the Prediction of Poor Ovarian Response to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation-A Real-World Data Analysis of 89,002 Patients.
    Wang X; Jin L; Mao YD; Shi JZ; Huang R; Jiang YN; Zhang CL; Liang XY
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():702061. PubMed ID: 34526967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ovarian response is associated with anogenital distance in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF.
    Fabregues F; González-Foruria I; Peñarrubia J; Carmona F
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 33(9):1696-1704. PubMed ID: 30016431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance.
    Morin SJ; Patounakis G; Juneau CR; Neal SA; Scott RT; Seli E
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1489-1498. PubMed ID: 30010882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicenter evaluation of the Access AMH antimüllerian hormone assay for the prediction of antral follicle count and poor ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation.
    Baker VL; Gracia C; Glassner MJ; Schnell VL; Doody K; Coddington CC; Shin SS; Marshall LA; Alper MM; Morales AJ; Pavone ME; Behera MA; Zbella EA; Shapiro BS; Straseski JA; Broyles DL
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Aug; 110(3):506-513.e3. PubMed ID: 29960708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antimüllerian hormone in gonadotropin releasing-hormone antagonist cycles: prediction of ovarian response and cumulative treatment outcome in good-prognosis patients.
    Arce JC; La Marca A; Mirner Klein B; Nyboe Andersen A; Fleming R
    Fertil Steril; 2013 May; 99(6):1644-53. PubMed ID: 23394782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antral follicle count and anti-Müllerian hormone to classify low-prognosis women under the POSEIDON criteria: a classification agreement study of over 9000 patients.
    Esteves SC; Yarali H; Vuong LN; Carvalho JF; Özbek İY; Polat M; Le HL; Pham TD; Ho TM
    Hum Reprod; 2021 May; 36(6):1530-1541. PubMed ID: 33822057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive value of anti-müllerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and antral follicle count on the outcome of ovarian stimulation in women following GnRH-antagonist protocol for IVF/ET.
    Tsakos E; Tolikas A; Daniilidis A; Asimakopoulos B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1249-53. PubMed ID: 25001569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of ovarian response in women treated with corifollitropin alfa for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Polyzos NP; Tournaye H; Guzman L; Camus M; Nelson SM
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 23668992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in vitro fertilization using ovarian reserve markers.
    Grisendi V; La Marca A
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Jun; 69(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 28271699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Circulating basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.
    Nardo LG; Gelbaya TA; Wilkinson H; Roberts SA; Yates A; Pemberton P; Laing I
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1586-93. PubMed ID: 18930213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prior salpingectomy impairs the retrieved oocyte number in in vitro fertilization cycles of women under 35 years old without optimal ovarian reserve.
    Ho CY; Chang YY; Lin YH; Chen MJ
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268021. PubMed ID: 35507603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individualized FSH dosing based on ovarian reserve testing in women starting IVF/ICSI: a multicentre trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    van Tilborg TC; Oudshoorn SC; Eijkemans MJC; Mochtar MH; van Golde RJT; Hoek A; Kuchenbecker WKH; Fleischer K; de Bruin JP; Groen H; van Wely M; Lambalk CB; Laven JSE; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL;
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 32(12):2485-2495. PubMed ID: 29121350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of anti-Müllerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve.
    Kwee J; Schats R; McDonnell J; Themmen A; de Jong F; Lambalk C
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):737-43. PubMed ID: 17923131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discordance between serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations and antral follicle counts: not only technical issues.
    Alebic MŠ; Stojanovic N; Dewailly D
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1141-1148. PubMed ID: 29688494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anti-Müllerian hormone levels to predict oocyte maturity and embryo quality during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.
    Melado Vidales L; Fernández-Nistal A; Martínez Fernández V; Verdú Merino V; Bruna Catalán I; Bajo Arenas JM
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Jun; 69(3):225-232. PubMed ID: 27352270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel mathematical model of true ovarian reserve assessment based on predicted probability of poor ovarian response: a retrospective cohort study.
    Xu H; Feng G; Wang H; Han Y; Yang R; Song Y; Chen L; Shi L; Zhang MQ; Li R; Qiao J
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Apr; 37(4):963-972. PubMed ID: 32318905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infertile women below the age of 40 have similar anti-Müllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count compared with women of the same age with no history of infertility.
    Hvidman HW; Bentzen JG; Thuesen LL; Lauritsen MP; Forman JL; Loft A; Pinborg A; Nyboe Andersen A
    Hum Reprod; 2016 May; 31(5):1034-45. PubMed ID: 26965431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.