These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37922349)

  • 1. Partisan conflict over content moderation is more than disagreement about facts.
    Appel RE; Pan J; Roberts ME
    Sci Adv; 2023 Nov; 9(44):eadg6799. PubMed ID: 37922349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resolving content moderation dilemmas between free speech and harmful misinformation.
    Kozyreva A; Herzog SM; Lewandowsky S; Hertwig R; Lorenz-Spreen P; Leiser M; Reifler J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Feb; 120(7):e2210666120. PubMed ID: 36749721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Partisan self-interest is an important driver for people's support for the regulation of targeted political advertising.
    Baum K; Meissner S; Krasnova H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250506. PubMed ID: 33979358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Partisan bias in false memories for misinformation about the 2021 U.S. Capitol riot.
    Calvillo DP; Harris JD; Hawkins WC
    Memory; 2023 Jan; 31(1):137-146. PubMed ID: 36170037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality.
    Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Feb; 116(7):2521-2526. PubMed ID: 30692252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy.
    Van Boven L; Ehret PJ; Sherman DK
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 13(4):492-507. PubMed ID: 29961412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing political polarization in the United States with a mobile chat platform.
    Combs A; Tierney G; Guay B; Merhout F; Bail CA; Hillygus DS; Volfovsky A
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Sep; 7(9):1454-1461. PubMed ID: 37604989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sick of Health Care Politics? Comparing Views of Quality of Care Between Democrats and Republicans.
    Scott KW; Blendon RJ; Benson JM
    J Healthc Qual; 2016; 38(6):e39-e51. PubMed ID: 27579601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Online experiment during the 2020 US-Iran crisis shows that exposure to common enemies can increase political polarization.
    Jahani E; Gallagher N; Merhout F; Cavalli N; Guilbeault D; Leng Y; Bail CA
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19304. PubMed ID: 36369344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distressed Democrats and relaxed Republicans? Partisanship and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Bock S; Schnabel L
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0266562. PubMed ID: 35446860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social media use and vaccination among Democrats and Republicans: Informational and normative influences.
    DeMora SL; Granados Samayoa JA; Albarracín D
    Soc Sci Med; 2024 Jul; 352():117031. PubMed ID: 38850678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample.
    Ecker UKH; Sze BKN; Andreotta M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Apr; 376(1822):20200145. PubMed ID: 33612006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans.
    Moore-Berg SL; Ankori-Karlinsky LO; Hameiri B; Bruneau E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(26):14864-14872. PubMed ID: 32527858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. America's electorate is increasingly polarized along partisan lines about voting by mail during the COVID-19 crisis.
    Lockhart M; Hill SJ; Merolla J; Romero M; Kousser T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Oct; 117(40):24640-24642. PubMed ID: 32963092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the Efficacy of Accuracy Prompts Across Partisan Lines: An Adversarial Collaboration.
    Martel C; Rathje S; Clark CJ; Pennycook G; Van Bavel JJ; Rand DG; van der Linden S
    Psychol Sci; 2024 Apr; 35(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 38506937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Affective Polarization and Misinformation Belief.
    Jenke L
    Polit Behav; 2023 Jan; ():1-60. PubMed ID: 36691451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Belief change in times of crisis: Providing facts about COVID-19-induced inequalities closes the partisan divide but fuels intra-partisan polarization about inequality.
    Mijs JJB; de Koster W; van der Waal J
    Soc Sci Res; 2022 May; 104():102692. PubMed ID: 35400387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The measurement of partisan sorting for 180 million voters.
    Brown JR; Enos RD
    Nat Hum Behav; 2021 Aug; 5(8):998-1008. PubMed ID: 33686203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In-party love spreads more efficiently than out-party hate in online communities.
    Martin-Gutierrez S; Robles Morales JM; Torcal M; Losada JC; Benito RM
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):15700. PubMed ID: 38977803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.