These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37923941)

  • 61. Biodiversity and Functional Attributes of Rhizospheric Microbiomes: Potential Tools for Sustainable Agriculture.
    Kour D; Kour H; Khan SS; Khan RT; Bhardwaj M; Kailoo S; Kumari C; Rasool S; Yadav AN; Sharma YP
    Curr Microbiol; 2023 Apr; 80(6):192. PubMed ID: 37101055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparative Effect of Fertilization Practices on Soil Microbial Diversity and Activity: An Overview.
    Sabir MS; Shahzadi F; Ali F; Shakeela Q; Niaz Z; Ahmed S
    Curr Microbiol; 2021 Oct; 78(10):3644-3655. PubMed ID: 34480627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Assessment of by-products of bioenergy systems (anaerobic digestion and gasification) as potential crop nutrient.
    Kataki S; Hazarika S; Baruah DC
    Waste Manag; 2017 Jan; 59():102-117. PubMed ID: 27771200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Soil carbon sequestration in rainfed production systems in the semiarid tropics of India.
    Srinivasarao Ch; Lal R; Kundu S; Babu MB; Venkateswarlu B; Singh AK
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jul; 487():587-603. PubMed ID: 24210647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Agricultural waste utilisation strategies and demand for urban waste compost: Evidence from smallholder farmers in Ethiopia.
    Nigussie A; Kuyper TW; de Neergaard A
    Waste Manag; 2015 Oct; 44():82-93. PubMed ID: 26239937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Biopreparations for the decomposition of crop residues.
    Rowińska P; Gutarowska B; Janas R; Szulc J
    Microb Biotechnol; 2024 Aug; 17(8):e14534. PubMed ID: 39109491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Closing Yield Gaps: How Sustainable Can We Be?
    Pradhan P; Fischer G; van Velthuizen H; Reusser DE; Kropp JP
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129487. PubMed ID: 26083456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparison between aerobic and anaerobic co-composting of agricultural residues.
    El Sebaie OD; Hussin AH; Shalaby EE; Mohamed MG; Lbrahem MT
    J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 2000; 75(1-2):131-52. PubMed ID: 17219853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: A double-edged sword.
    Shukla K; Mishra V; Singh J; Varshney V; Verma R; Srivastava S
    J Sci Food Agric; 2024 Aug; 104(10):5675-5688. PubMed ID: 38285130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Impact of nanophos in agriculture to improve functional bacterial community and crop productivity.
    Chaudhary P; Chaudhary A; Parveen H; Rani A; Kumar G; Kumar R; Sharma A
    BMC Plant Biol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):519. PubMed ID: 34749648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A Review on Current Status of Biochar Uses in Agriculture.
    Allohverdi T; Mohanty AK; Roy P; Misra M
    Molecules; 2021 Sep; 26(18):. PubMed ID: 34577054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Rhizosphere Microbiome Modulators: Contributions of Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria towards Sustainable Agriculture.
    Igiehon NO; Babalola OO
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Mar; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29570619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Biofertilizers: a potential approach for sustainable agriculture development.
    Mahanty T; Bhattacharjee S; Goswami M; Bhattacharyya P; Das B; Ghosh A; Tribedi P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Feb; 24(4):3315-3335. PubMed ID: 27888482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Promising bacterial genera for agricultural practices: An insight on plant growth-promoting properties and microbial safety aspects.
    Ferreira CMH; Soares HMVM; Soares EV
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Sep; 682():779-799. PubMed ID: 31146074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Bacterial indicator of agricultural management for soil under no-till crop production.
    Figuerola EL; Guerrero LD; Rosa SM; Simonetti L; Duval ME; Galantini JA; Bedano JC; Wall LG; Erijman L
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e51075. PubMed ID: 23226466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76.
    Khan AR; Mustafa A; Hyder S; Valipour M; Rizvi ZF; Gondal AS; Yousuf Z; Iqbal R; Daraz U
    Biology (Basel); 2022 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 36552272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Accounting for soil biotic effects on soil health and crop productivity in the design of crop rotations.
    Dias T; Dukes A; Antunes PM
    J Sci Food Agric; 2015 Feb; 95(3):447-54. PubMed ID: 24408021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Strategic valorization of de-oiled microalgal biomass waste as biofertilizer for sustainable and improved agriculture of rice (Oryza sativa L.) crop.
    Nayak M; Swain DK; Sen R
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Sep; 682():475-484. PubMed ID: 31128367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Associations between soil bacterial community structure and nutrient cycling functions in long-term organic farm soils following cover crop and organic fertilizer amendment.
    Fernandez AL; Sheaffer CC; Wyse DL; Staley C; Gould TJ; Sadowsky MJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Oct; 566-567():949-959. PubMed ID: 27288977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Developing novel bacterial based bioformulation having PGPR properties for enhanced production of agricultural crops.
    Kalita M; Bharadwaz M; Dey T; Gogoi K; Dowarah P; Unni BG; Ozah D; Saikia I
    Indian J Exp Biol; 2015 Jan; 53(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 25675713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.