218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37924154)
1. Evaluating the value of
Luo L; Zheng A; Chang R; Li Y; Gao J; Wang Z; Duan X
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Nov; 23(1):108. PubMed ID: 37924154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Establishment and prospective validation of an SUV
Jiao J; Kang F; Zhang J; Quan Z; Wen W; Zhao X; Ma S; Wu P; Yang F; Guo W; Yang X; Yuan J; Shi Y; Wang J; Qin W
Theranostics; 2021; 11(17):8396-8411. PubMed ID: 34373749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Head-to-Head Comparison of
Kuten J; Fahoum I; Savin Z; Shamni O; Gitstein G; Hershkovitz D; Mabjeesh NJ; Yossepowitch O; Mishani E; Even-Sapir E
J Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 61(4):527-532. PubMed ID: 31562225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Immunohistochemical Validation of PSMA Expression Measured by
Woythal N; Arsenic R; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Janssen JC; Huang K; Makowski MR; Brenner W; Prasad V
J Nucl Med; 2018 Feb; 59(2):238-243. PubMed ID: 28775203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective evaluation of 68Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer.
van Leeuwen PJ; Emmett L; Ho B; Delprado W; Ting F; Nguyen Q; Stricker PD
BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 27207581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incremental Impact of [
Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Head-to-Head Comparison of
Exterkate L; Hermsen R; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Prette JF; Baas DJH; Somford DM; van Basten JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):574-581. PubMed ID: 37230883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immunohistochemical and histopathological validation of
Heetman JG; Hermsen R; Exterkate L; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Brouwer LJM; Somford DM; van den Bergh RCN; van Basten JA
Prostate; 2023 Oct; 83(14):1332-1341. PubMed ID: 37455399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of
Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary lymph-node staging with
Corona-Montes VE; González-Cuenca E; Fernández-Noyola G; Olarte-Casas MA; Bobadilla-Salazar D; Medrano-Urtecho HM; Asimakopoulos AD
Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic value of integrated
Zeng Y; Leng X; Liao H; Jiang G; Chen P
Prostate Int; 2022 Jun; 10(2):108-116. PubMed ID: 35510079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A single-center, multi-factor, retrospective study to improve the diagnostic accuracy of primary prostate cancer using [
Lv J; Yu H; Yin H; Shi Y; Shi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Feb; 51(3):919-927. PubMed ID: 37940684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardised uptake values as determined on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography is associated with oncological outcomes in patients with prostate cancer.
Bodar YJL; Veerman H; Meijer D; de Bie K; van Leeuwen PJ; Donswijk ML; van Moorselaar RJA; Hendrikse NH; Boellaard R; Oprea-Lager DE; Vis AN
BJU Int; 2022 Jun; 129(6):768-776. PubMed ID: 35166426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lymph node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy managed in a prostate cancer unit.
Maestroni UV; Campobasso D; Guarino G; Acampora A; Scarlattei M; Ziglioli F; Dinale F; Baldari G; Migliari S; Gasparro D; Ferretti S; Silini EM; Ruffini L
Chin Clin Oncol; 2023 Jun; 12(3):22. PubMed ID: 37417288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Head-to-Head Comparison of
Sonni I; Felker ER; Lenis AT; Sisk AE; Bahri S; Allen-Auerbach M; Armstrong WR; Suvannarerg V; Tubtawee T; Grogan T; Elashoff D; Eiber M; Raman SS; Czernin J; Reiter RE; Calais J
J Nucl Med; 2022 Jun; 63(6):847-854. PubMed ID: 34649942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of preoperative locoregional Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT and mp-MRI results with postoperative histopathology of prostate cancer.
Yilmaz B; Turkay R; Colakoglu Y; Baytekin HF; Ergul N; Sahin S; Tugcu V; Inci E; Tasci AI; Cermik TF
Prostate; 2019 Jun; 79(9):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 31012125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of
Liu X; Wang Q; Zhang B; Jiang T; Zeng W
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 35388806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
