These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37924179)

  • 1. Height and Body Mass on the Mating Market : Associations With Number of Sex Partners and Extra-Pair Sex Among Heterosexual Men and Women Aged 18-65.
    Frederick DA; Jenkins BN
    Evol Psychol; 2015 Sep; 13(3):1474704915604563. PubMed ID: 37924179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preferred and actual relative height among homosexual male partners vary with preferred dominance and sex role.
    Valentova JV; Stulp G; Třebický V; Havlíček J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86534. PubMed ID: 24466136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings?
    Stulp G; Buunk AP; Pollet TV; Nettle D; Verhulst S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54186. PubMed ID: 23342102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A meta-analysis of the association between male dimorphism and fitness outcomes in humans.
    Lidborg LH; Cross CP; Boothroyd LG
    Elife; 2022 Feb; 11():. PubMed ID: 35179485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do centimetres matter? Self-reported versus estimated height measurements in parents.
    Gozzi T; Flück C; L'allemand D; Dattani MT; Hindmarsh PC; Mullis PE
    Acta Paediatr; 2010 Apr; 99(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 20050829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-linear associations between stature and mate choice characteristics for American men and their spouses.
    Stulp G; Mills M; Pollet TV; Barrett L
    Am J Hum Biol; 2014; 26(4):530-7. PubMed ID: 24817592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assortative mate preferences for height across short-term and long-term relationship contexts in a cross-cultural sample.
    Pisanski K; Fernandez-Alonso M; Díaz-Simón N; Oleszkiewicz A; Sardinas A; Pellegrino R; Estevez N; Mora EC; Luckett CR; Feinberg DR
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():937146. PubMed ID: 36092066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trading height for education in the marriage market.
    Ponzo M; Scoppa V
    Am J Hum Biol; 2015; 27(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 25280116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Body mass index, sexual behaviour, and sexually transmitted infections: an analysis using the NHANES 1999-2000 data.
    Nagelkerke NJ; Bernsen RM; Sgaier SK; Jha P
    BMC Public Health; 2006 Aug; 6():199. PubMed ID: 16884541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gender-role ideology and height preference in mate selection.
    Tao HL
    Econ Hum Biol; 2020 Dec; 39():100927. PubMed ID: 33126024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human height preferences as a function of population size in the Cook Islands and Norway.
    Sorokowski P; Oleszkiewicz A; Sorokowska A; Pisanski K
    Am J Hum Biol; 2020 May; 32(3):e23367. PubMed ID: 31793702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in height as a strategy for increasing the pool of potential partners in humans.
    Pawłowski B
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Apr; 270(1516):709-12. PubMed ID: 12713744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mate retention behavior of men and women in heterosexual and homosexual relationships.
    Vanderlaan DP; Vasey PL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Aug; 37(4):572-85. PubMed ID: 17216358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results of an explorative empirical study on human mating in Germany: handsome men, not high-status men, succeed in courtship.
    Pashos A; Niemitz C
    Anthropol Anz; 2003 Sep; 61(3):331-41. PubMed ID: 14524006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A curvilinear effect of height on reproductive success in human males.
    Stulp G; Pollet TV; Verhulst S; Buunk AP
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2012 Mar; 66(3):375-384. PubMed ID: 22389549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intersexual and Intrasexual Differences in Mate Selection Preferences Among Lesbian Women, Gay Men, and Bisexual Women and Men.
    Klümper L; Hassebrauck M; Schwarz S
    Arch Sex Behav; 2024 Jan; 53(1):177-203. PubMed ID: 37558933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fish in the sea: Number, characteristics, and partner preferences of unmarried Japanese adults - analysis of a national survey.
    Ghaznavi C; Sakamoto H; Nomura S; Kubota A; Yoneoka D; Shibuya K; Ueda P
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0262528. PubMed ID: 35108292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Love, careers, and heights in France, 2001.
    Herpin N
    Econ Hum Biol; 2005 Dec; 3(3):420-49. PubMed ID: 15894522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Height and reproductive success in a cohort of british men.
    Nettle D
    Hum Nat; 2002 Dec; 13(4):473-91. PubMed ID: 26193091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.