162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37924186)
1. Vote Choice, Ideology, and Social Dominance Orientation Influence Preferences for Lower Pitched Voices in Political Candidates.
Laustsen L; Petersen MB; Klofstad CA
Evol Psychol; 2015 Sep; 13(3):1474704915600576. PubMed ID: 37924186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans
Balliet D; Tybur JM; Wu J; Antonellis C; Van Lange PAM
J Conflict Resolut; 2018 Apr; 62(4):797-818. PubMed ID: 29593363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preference for leaders with masculine voices holds in the case of feminine leadership roles.
Anderson RC; Klofstad CA
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51216. PubMed ID: 23251457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptions of Competence, Strength, and Age Influence Voters to Select Leaders with Lower-Pitched Voices.
Klofstad CA; Anderson RC; Nowicki S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133779. PubMed ID: 26252894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low Vocal Pitch Preference Drives First Impressions Irrespective of Context in Male Voices but Not in Female Voices.
Tsantani MS; Belin P; Paterson HM; McAleer P
Perception; 2016 Aug; 45(8):946-963. PubMed ID: 27081101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preference for leaders with high and low facial width-to-height ratios: moderating roles of political ideology and voting context.
Banai B; Bačić M; Banai IP
Curr Issues Personal Psychol; 2023; 11(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 38013826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter-gatherers.
Apicella CL; Feinberg DR
Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Mar; 276(1659):1077-82. PubMed ID: 19129125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Political orientation, political environment, and health behaviors in the United States.
Kannan VD; Veazie PJ
Prev Med; 2018 Sep; 114():95-101. PubMed ID: 29940293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When the Party Decides: The Effects of Facial Competence and Dominance on Internal Nominations of Political Candidates.
Laustsen L; Petersen MB
Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704917732005. PubMed ID: 29911407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Self-rated Attractiveness and Sociosexual Behavior Predict Gay Men's Preferences for Masculine Cues in Male Voices in China.
Zhang J; Zheng L; Zheng Y
Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(2):1474704919847430. PubMed ID: 31068003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Multiple-Matching Perspective on Value Versus Identity: Investigating How Political Ideology and Party Identity Contribute to Citizens' Support for Political Candidates.
Bai H
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2024 Jan; 50(1):58-77. PubMed ID: 36113113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.
Chiao JY; Bowman NE; Gill H
PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3666. PubMed ID: 18974841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The gender gap: differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation.
Pratto F; Stallworth LM; Sidanius J
Br J Soc Psychol; 1997 Mar; 36 ( Pt 1)():49-68. PubMed ID: 9114484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. When do people prefer dominant over prestigious political leaders?
Jiménez ÁV; Flitton A; Mesoudi A
Evol Hum Sci; 2021; 3():e16. PubMed ID: 37588522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preferences for very low and very high voice pitch in humans.
Re DE; O'Connor JJ; Bennett PJ; Feinberg DR
PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32719. PubMed ID: 22403701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sounds like a winner: voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women.
Klofstad CA; Anderson RC; Peters S
Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Jul; 279(1738):2698-704. PubMed ID: 22418254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cooperative and conformist behavioural preferences predict the dual dimensions of political ideology.
Claessens S; Sibley CG; Chaudhuri A; Atkinson QD
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4886. PubMed ID: 36966181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
Pennycook G; Rand DG
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Feb; 45(2):224-239. PubMed ID: 29985107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hurt on Both Sides: Political Differences in Health and Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Coleman ME; Andersson MA
J Health Soc Behav; 2024 Mar; 65(1):94-109. PubMed ID: 37864410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
