BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37924263)

  • 1. Recurrence After Biopsy-Confirmed Cervical High-Grade Intraepithelial Lesion Followed by Negative Conization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Viveros-Carreño D; Mora-Soto N; Rodríguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Ramírez PT; López Varón M; Krause KJ; Grillo-Ardila CF; Jeronimo J; Pareja R
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2024 Jan; 28(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 37924263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
    Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endocervical crypt involvement by high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and its association with high-grade histopathological recurrence after cervical excision in women with negative excision margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Papoutsis D; Underwood M; Parry-Smith W; Tzavara C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Mar; 309(3):939-948. PubMed ID: 37821642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative efficacy and complication rates after local treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and stage 1a1 cervical cancer: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis from the CIRCLE Group.
    Athanasiou A; Veroniki AA; Efthimiou O; Kalliala I; Naci H; Bowden S; Paraskevaidi M; Martin-Hirsch P; Bennett P; Paraskevaidis E; Salanti G; Kyrgiou M
    BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e028008. PubMed ID: 31377697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study.
    Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human papilloma virus testing in patient follow-up post cone biopsy due to high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Almog B; Gamzu R; Kuperminc MJ; Levin I; Fainaru O; Niv J; Bar-Am A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Mar; 88(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 12648585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pathological discrepancy between colposcopic directed cervical biopsy and Loop Electrosurgical-Excision Procedures (LEEPs) in patients with biopsies proven high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Noothong S; Inthasorn P; Warnnissorn M
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 56(5):628-631. PubMed ID: 29037548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recurrence in Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion: The Role of the Excised Endocervical Canal Length-Analysis of 2,427 Patients.
    Foggiatto AI; de Carvalho NS; Fonseca FV; Maestri CA
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2023 Jan; 27(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 36205329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of occult endocervical glandular dysplasia in cervical conization specimens for squamous lesions.
    Sopracordevole F; Clemente N; Alessandrini L; Di Giuseppe J; Cigolot F; Buttignol M; Ciavattini A; Canzonieri V
    Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Mar; 213(3):210-216. PubMed ID: 28214204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of clinical evolution in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) treated by cervical conization.
    Cardoso FA; Campaner AB; Silva MA
    APMIS; 2014 Mar; 122(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 23763281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes of cases with cervical dysplasia absent in cold knife conization specimens.
    Baser E; Ozgu E; Erkilinc S; Yalcin H; Cetinkaya N; Sirvan L; Erkaya S; Gungor T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014 Jan; 14(11):6693-6. PubMed ID: 24377590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MiRNA detection in cervical exfoliated cells for missed high-grade lesions in women with LSIL/CIN1 diagnosis after colposcopy-guided biopsy.
    Ye J; Cheng XD; Cheng B; Cheng YF; Chen XJ; Lu WG
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jan; 19(1):112. PubMed ID: 30700264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship of human papillomavirus infection with endocervical glandular involvement on cone specimens in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Spinillo A; Dominoni M; Boschi AC; Cesari S; Fiandrino G; Gardella B
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):630-635. PubMed ID: 33041069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of multiple high-risk human papillomavirus infection on the persistence recurrence of high-grade cervical lesions after standard treatment: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.
    Cassani C; Dominoni M; Pasquali MF; Gardella B; Spinillo A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Jun; 103(6):1028-1035. PubMed ID: 38477097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of Conservative Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Stage IA1: Results of Follow-Up to 20 Years.
    Hartman CA; Teixeira JC; Barbosa SB; Figueiredo SM; Andrade LA; Bastos JF
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):357-363. PubMed ID: 27984378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-specific predictors of cervical dysplasia recurrence after primary conization: analysis of 3,212 women.
    Bogani G; Pinelli C; Chiappa V; Martinelli F; Lopez S; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Sep; 31(5):e60. PubMed ID: 32808492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reevaluation of negative cervical conizations: Frequency, diagnostic errors, risk factors and management.
    Lorenset LC; Percicote AP; Munhos SHO; Zanine RM
    Pathol Res Pract; 2024 May; 257():155283. PubMed ID: 38614053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recurrence rate after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and laser Conization: A 5-year follow-up study.
    Bogani G; DI Donato V; Sopracordevole F; Ciavattini A; Ghelardi A; Lopez S; Simoncini T; Plotti F; Casarin J; Serati M; Pinelli C; Valenti G; Bergamini A; Gardella B; Dell'acqua A; Monti E; Vercellini P; Fischetti M; D'Ippolito G; Aguzzoli L; Mandato VD; Carunchio P; Carlinfante G; Giannella L; Scaffa C; Falcone F; Borghi C; Ditto A; Malzoni M; Giannini A; Salerno MG; Liberale V; Contino B; Donfrancesco C; Desiato M; Perrone AM; Dondi G; De Iaco P; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Signorelli M; Chiappa V; Ferrero S; Sarpietro G; Matarazzo MG; Cianci A; Bosio S; Ruisi S; Guerrisi R; Brusadelli C; Mosca L; Tinelli R; DE Vincenzo R; Zannoni GF; Ferrandina G; Petrillo M; Dessole S; Angioli R; Greggi S; Spinillo A; Ghezzi F; Colacurci N; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):636-641. PubMed ID: 32893030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
    Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
    Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.