119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37924729)
1. Data-driven analysis on the performance evaluation of national R&D projects in Korea.
Cho H; Ahn H; Park E
Eval Program Plann; 2024 Feb; 102():102383. PubMed ID: 37924729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. International R&D Collaboration for a Global Aging Society: Focusing on Aging-Related National-Funded Projects.
Lee D; Kim S; Kim K
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(22):. PubMed ID: 33217997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structural equation model for the evaluation of national funding on R&D project of SMEs in consideration with MBNQA criteria.
Sohn SY; Gyu Joo Y; Kyu Han H
Eval Program Plann; 2007 Feb; 30(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 17689310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the role of R&D collaborations and non-patent IP policies in government technology transfer performance: Evidence from U.S. federal agencies (1999-2016).
Hemmatian I; Ponzio TA; Joshi AM
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268828. PubMed ID: 35609062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analyses of direct and indirect impacts of a positive list system on pharmaceutical R&D investments.
Han E; Kim TH; Jeung MJ; Lee EK
Clin Ther; 2013 Jul; 35(7):941-9. PubMed ID: 23806327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.
Carter YH; Shaw S; Macfarlane F
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract; 2002 Feb; (81):iii-vi, 1-72. PubMed ID: 12049028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Public R&D Projects-Based Investment and Collaboration Framework for an Overarching South Korean National Strategy of Personalized Medicine.
Lee D; Kim K
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analyzing the efficiency of small and medium-sized enterprises of a national technology innovation research and development program.
Park S
Springerplus; 2014; 3():403. PubMed ID: 25120949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of SMEs' R&D performances by machine learning for project selection.
Yoo HS; Jung YL; Jun SP
Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):7598. PubMed ID: 37165080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of an evaluation framework for publicly funded R&D projects: The case of Korea's Next Generation Network.
Kim E; Kim S; Kim H
Eval Program Plann; 2017 Aug; 63():18-28. PubMed ID: 28319783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolution of technology convergence networks in Korea: Characteristics of temporal changes in R&D according to institution type.
Choi JY; Jeong S; Jung JK
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192195. PubMed ID: 29420574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
Johnston PG; Daly PA; Liu E
Oncologist; 1999; 4(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 10545862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Research on cancer diagnosis in Malaysia: current status.
Looi LM; Zubaidah Z; Cheah PL; Cheong SK; Gudum HR; Iekhsan O; Ikram SI; Jamal R; Mak JW; Othman NH; Puteri JN; Rosline H; Sabariah AR; Seow HF; Sharifah NA;
Malays J Pathol; 2004 Jun; 26(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 16190103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in technology innovation R&D performance creation behavior between for-profit institutions and not-for-profit institutions.
Park S
Springerplus; 2016; 5():451. PubMed ID: 27119055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the impact of the nationwide public-private mix (PPM) program for tuberculosis under National Health Insurance in South Korea: A difference in differences analysis.
Yu S; Sohn H; Kim HY; Kim H; Oh KH; Kim HJ; Chung H; Choi H
PLoS Med; 2021 Jul; 18(7):e1003717. PubMed ID: 34260579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Issues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners.
Lilford RJ; Richardson A; Stevens A; Fitzpatrick R; Edwards S; Rock F; Hutton JL
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(8):1-57. PubMed ID: 11368832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the effectiveness of coupon-mediated newborn hearing screening program through comparison of two government-funded pilot projects in South Korea.
Park SK; Chang J; Chung YS; Oh SH
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Sep; 136():110256. PubMed ID: 32738621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Family planning operations research in Africa: reviewing a decade of experience.
Wawer MJ; McNamara R; McGinn T; Lauro D
Stud Fam Plann; 1991; 22(5):279-93. PubMed ID: 1759274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of trends in patent development for coronavirus detection, prevention, and treatment technologies in key countries.
Wei F; Zhou H; Gao G; Zheng Q
J Biosaf Biosecur; 2022 Jun; 4(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 34746687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship between government research funding and the cancer burden in South Korea: implications for prioritising health research.
Jung YL; Yoo HS; Kim ES
Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 Dec; 17(1):103. PubMed ID: 31870382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
