These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3792693)

  • 21. The health executive and the new medical technologies.
    Williams JI
    Health Manage Forum; 1983; 4(4):13-30. PubMed ID: 10264335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automation in service: the need for microassessment.
    Svensson S
    Clin Eng; 1980; 8(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 10297724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hospital-based technology assessment programmes: two Canadian examples.
    Juzwishin D; Olmstead D; Menon D
    World Hosp Health Serv; 1996; 32(2):2-9. PubMed ID: 10165872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Technology: a moral evaluation. Ethical questions on the use of technology from a macro and micro perspective.
    Lappetito J
    Health Prog; 1993; 74(1):48-9, 79. PubMed ID: 10123569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Technology assessment. A framework for generating questions useful in evaluating nursing information systems.
    Manning J; McConnell EA
    Comput Nurs; 1997; 15(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 9161091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High-energy versus low-energy external biphasic defibrillators.
    Health Devices; 2003 May; 32(5):205-6. PubMed ID: 12827943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Tier testing systems in toxicology and decision-making criteria for their use.
    Astill BD; Lockhart HB; Moses JB; Nasr A; Raleigh RL; Terhaar CJ
    Dev Toxicol Environ Sci; 1980; 8():441-52. PubMed ID: 7308044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing the performance of health technology assessment organizations: a framework.
    Lafortune L; Farand L; Mondou I; Sicotte C; Battista R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18218172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Supporting CPR development with the commercial off-the-shelf systems evaluation technique: defining requirements, setting priorities, and evaluating choices.
    Celli M; Ryberg DE; Leaderman AV
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 1998; 12(4):11-9. PubMed ID: 10345829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing new technology: CEDIT.
    Jolly D
    World Hosp; 1985 Nov; 21(4):45-6. PubMed ID: 10276037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methodology for assessment of medical IT-based systems in an organisational context.
    Brender J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 42():1-295. PubMed ID: 10184785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of CEDIT recommendations: An example of health technology assessment in a hospital network.
    Bodeau-Livinec F; Simon E; Montagnier-Petrissans C; Joël ME; Féry-Lemonnier E
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 16571191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contribution of economic evaluation to decision making in early phases of product development: a methodological and empirical review.
    Hartz S; John J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 18828942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Decisions about critical events in device-related scenarios as a function of expertise.
    Laxmisan A; Malhotra S; Keselman A; Johnson TR; Patel VL
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Jun; 38(3):200-12. PubMed ID: 15896693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Incorporating Quantitative Patient Preference Data into Healthcare Decision Making Processes: Is HTA Falling Behind?
    Mott DJ
    Patient; 2018 Jun; 11(3):249-252. PubMed ID: 29500706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Towards a New Framework for Addressing Structural Uncertainty in Health Technology Assessment Guidelines.
    Ghabri S; Cleemput I; Josselin JM
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Feb; 36(2):127-130. PubMed ID: 29264865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hospital-based health technology assessment: insights from New Zealand.
    Munn SR
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Sep; 32(9):815-7. PubMed ID: 25117205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Health technology news. Assessing effectiveness: databases can help.
    Menon D
    Dimens Health Serv; 1991 Apr; 68(3):8-9. PubMed ID: 1894091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A View from the Bridge: Health Economic Evaluation - A Value-Based Framework?
    Briggs A
    Health Econ; 2016 Dec; 25(12):1499-1502. PubMed ID: 27870333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.